Misplaced Pages

Talk:WhatPulse: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:18, 31 March 2016 edit71.174.176.65 (talk) Version history: this detailed version history is too extreme← Previous edit Revision as of 21:18, 11 May 2022 edit undoChristian75 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers114,769 edits Assessment (Start/Low): +Software (Rater)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Software |class=Start |importance=Low}}

== Linux == == Linux ==
Can anyone let me know about WhatPulse for Linux? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:26, 31 August 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> Can anyone let me know about WhatPulse for Linux? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:26, 31 August 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

Revision as of 21:18, 11 May 2022

WikiProject iconSoftware: Computing Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Linux

Can anyone let me know about WhatPulse for Linux? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.37.181.117 (talkcontribs) 15:26, 31 August 2005

notable?

Is this software really notable? Who really cares about how much they type, unless they're worried about carpal tunnel? Rpresser 04:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Questionable, although I uses the program. Definitely not a speedy and it should not be proposed deleted. SYSS Mouse 03:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I'd say the sizeable user base of at least 100,000 makes it notable enough – then again I am saying this 7 years on, when that number has undoubtedly grown. Microphonics 10:31, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

There are many reasons to monitor computer usage and activity.-71.174.176.65 (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Version history

The bulk of this article is made up of a detailed version history. Is this really worthy of inclusion? — 146.179.8.134 (talk) 15:48, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

I mostly prefer more details in articles. But this detailed version history is too extreme even for me -- it needs to be consolidated, should be less than half as detailed -- but I do like having all of the version numbers and dates.-71.174.176.65 (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Categories: