Misplaced Pages

Douglas Latchford: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:06, 12 May 2022 editDom Kaos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,442 edits Repatriation of collection: corrected source← Previous edit Revision as of 05:26, 13 May 2022 edit undoGünniX (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users312,603 editsm ref name; duplicate referencesTag: AWBNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
A controversial figure, Latchford was best known as a collector of ]n antiquities. According to his obituary in '']'', Latchford was "a cultured accumulator of museum-quality Khmer sculptures and jewels", whilst '']'' reported that, due to his leading position in the illegal antiquities trade of the ], "no single figure looms as large over a nation’s wholesale pillage."<ref name="Diplomat Obit">{{cite news|url=https://thediplomat.com/2020/08/douglas-latchford-the-man-who-pillaged-cambodia|work=The Diplomat|title=Douglas Latchford: The Man Who Pillaged Cambodia|first=Tess|last=Davis|date=21 August 2022|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> Nonetheless, the Cambodian government awarded Latchford a Grand Cross of the ] in 2008. He co-authored three books on Khmer antiquities with academic Emma Bunker.<ref name="TAN Obit"/> A controversial figure, Latchford was best known as a collector of ]n antiquities. According to his obituary in '']'', Latchford was "a cultured accumulator of museum-quality Khmer sculptures and jewels", whilst '']'' reported that, due to his leading position in the illegal antiquities trade of the ], "no single figure looms as large over a nation’s wholesale pillage."<ref name="Diplomat Obit">{{cite news|url=https://thediplomat.com/2020/08/douglas-latchford-the-man-who-pillaged-cambodia|work=The Diplomat|title=Douglas Latchford: The Man Who Pillaged Cambodia|first=Tess|last=Davis|date=21 August 2022|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> Nonetheless, the Cambodian government awarded Latchford a Grand Cross of the ] in 2008. He co-authored three books on Khmer antiquities with academic Emma Bunker.<ref name="TAN Obit"/>


In the 1970s, Latchford became one of the leading suppliers of Cambodian art, selling to museums and private collections in Europe and North America, including the ].<ref name="TAN Obit"/> He kept the best pieces for himself and his personal collection is rumored to rival that of the ].<ref name="Diplomat Obit"/> When his daughter inherited the collection and donated it in full to Cambodia, it contained 125 pieces and was valued at $50m.<ref name="NYT Mashberg">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/29/arts/design/cambodia-artifacts-douglas-latchford.html|work=The New York Times|title=With a Gift of Art, a Daughter Honors, if Not Absolves, Her Father|first=Tom|last=Mashberg|date=29 January 2021|access-date=12 May 2022|issn=0362-4331}}{{paywall}}</ref> Latchford liked to see himself as saving works of art that had been abandoned and were at risk during Cambodia's turbulent civil wars, although this viewpoint was contrasted by academics who alleged that several of Latchford's antiquities lacked a clear provenance. Latchford denied any wrongdoing, and gathered his collection long before legislation barring Latchford's practice of buying directly from farmers and dealers in Thailand.<ref name="TAN Obit"/> He also insisted that if the antiquities were not removed from Cambodia, “they would likely have been shot up for target practice by the Khmer Rouge.”<ref name="NYT Mashberg/> In November 2019, Latchford, by then comatose, was charged by prosecutors in New York with falsifying the provenance of Khmer works of art, but the case ended with his death.<ref name="NYT Obit"/> In the 1970s, Latchford became one of the leading suppliers of Cambodian art, selling to museums and private collections in Europe and North America, including the ].<ref name="TAN Obit"/> He kept the best pieces for himself and his personal collection is rumored to rival that of the ].<ref name="Diplomat Obit"/> When his daughter inherited the collection and donated it in full to Cambodia, it contained 125 pieces and was valued at $50m.<ref name="NYT Mashberg">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/29/arts/design/cambodia-artifacts-douglas-latchford.html|work=The New York Times|title=With a Gift of Art, a Daughter Honors, if Not Absolves, Her Father|first=Tom|last=Mashberg|date=29 January 2021|access-date=12 May 2022|issn=0362-4331}}{{paywall}}</ref> Latchford liked to see himself as saving works of art that had been abandoned and were at risk during Cambodia's turbulent civil wars, although this viewpoint was contrasted by academics who alleged that several of Latchford's antiquities lacked a clear provenance. Latchford denied any wrongdoing, and gathered his collection long before legislation barring Latchford's practice of buying directly from farmers and dealers in Thailand.<ref name="TAN Obit"/> He also insisted that if the antiquities were not removed from Cambodia, “they would likely have been shot up for target practice by the Khmer Rouge.”<ref name="NYT Mashberg"/> In November 2019, Latchford, by then comatose, was charged by prosecutors in New York with falsifying the provenance of Khmer works of art, but the case ended with his death.<ref name="NYT Obit"/>


In October 2021, a large investigation by media from the UK, USA, and Australia, working with the ], explored the prevalence of artworks that Latchford had traded to public museums and galleries.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.artnet.com/art-world/pandora-papers-douglas-latchford-2017069|work=]|title=The Pandora Papers Leak Reveals How the Late Dealer Douglas Latchford Used Offshore Accounts to Sell Looted Cambodian Antiquities|first=Sarah|last=Cascone|date=5 October 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> The media consortium focused on the books published by Latchford, sale records, museum records, and corporate documents from trust structures established by Latchford for inheritance purposes to identify 27 pieces linked to Latchford in prominent collections.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/05/offshore-trusts-used-pass-on-looted-khmer-treasures-leak-shows-douglas-latchford|work=]|title=Offshore loot: how notorious dealer used trusts to hoard Khmer treasures|first1=David|last1=Conn|author-link1=David Conn|first2=Malia|last2=Politzer|date=5 October 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> It highlighted at least a dozen works of art linked to Latchford held by the ], and another fifteen relics among the ], the ], ], and the ].<ref name="WashPost">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2021/met-museum-cambodian-antiquities-latchford/|work=]|title=GLOBAL HUNT FOR LOOTED TREASURES LEADS TO OFFSHORE TRUSTS|first1=Peter|last1=Whoriskey|first2=Malia|last2=Politzer|first3=Delphine|last3=Reuter|first4=Spencer|last4=Woodman|date=5 October 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> The reporting also investigated donations and sales by collectors and dealers associated with Latchford, identifying works of art in, amongst others, the ], ], National Gallery of Australia, and ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/05/how-artefacts-sold-indicted-dealer-douglas-latchford-australia-galleries|work=The Guardian|title=How artefacts linked to indicted dealer ended up in Australian galleries|first=Anne|last=Davies|author-link=Anne Davies (Australian journalist)|date=5 October 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> Many of the museums and galleries responded to the journalists and provided statements in relation to the allegations, although none made any commitment to return works associated with Latchford.<ref name="WashPost"/> The National Gallery of Australia claimed that a piece tied to Latchford was the subject of a live investigation, whilst the ] refused to engage with the journalists.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/10/05/museums-response-pandora-papers-antiquities/|work=The Washington Post|title=Responses from museums to Pandora Papers antiquities investigation|date=6 October 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> In November 2021, after rising pressure from the United States federal government, the ] agreed to voluntarily repatriate four Cambodian antiquities in their possession, which included three Khmer sandstone sculptures dating back to the 7th and 12th centuries, respectively, and an Iron Age Dong Son bronze bell.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.denverpost.com/2021/11/08/denver-art-museum-cambodian-antiquities-forfeiture|work=]|title=Denver Art Museum gives up looted Cambodian antiquities as feds seek forfeiture|first=Sam|last=Tabachnik|date=8 November 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> In October 2021, a large investigation by media from the UK, USA, and Australia, working with the ], explored the prevalence of artworks that Latchford had traded to public museums and galleries.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.artnet.com/art-world/pandora-papers-douglas-latchford-2017069|work=]|title=The Pandora Papers Leak Reveals How the Late Dealer Douglas Latchford Used Offshore Accounts to Sell Looted Cambodian Antiquities|first=Sarah|last=Cascone|date=5 October 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> The media consortium focused on the books published by Latchford, sale records, museum records, and corporate documents from trust structures established by Latchford for inheritance purposes to identify 27 pieces linked to Latchford in prominent collections.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/05/offshore-trusts-used-pass-on-looted-khmer-treasures-leak-shows-douglas-latchford|work=]|title=Offshore loot: how notorious dealer used trusts to hoard Khmer treasures|first1=David|last1=Conn|author-link1=David Conn|first2=Malia|last2=Politzer|date=5 October 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> It highlighted at least a dozen works of art linked to Latchford held by the ], and another fifteen relics among the ], the ], ], and the ].<ref name="WashPost">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2021/met-museum-cambodian-antiquities-latchford/|work=]|title=GLOBAL HUNT FOR LOOTED TREASURES LEADS TO OFFSHORE TRUSTS|first1=Peter|last1=Whoriskey|first2=Malia|last2=Politzer|first3=Delphine|last3=Reuter|first4=Spencer|last4=Woodman|date=5 October 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> The reporting also investigated donations and sales by collectors and dealers associated with Latchford, identifying works of art in, amongst others, the ], ], National Gallery of Australia, and ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/05/how-artefacts-sold-indicted-dealer-douglas-latchford-australia-galleries|work=The Guardian|title=How artefacts linked to indicted dealer ended up in Australian galleries|first=Anne|last=Davies|author-link=Anne Davies (Australian journalist)|date=5 October 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> Many of the museums and galleries responded to the journalists and provided statements in relation to the allegations, although none made any commitment to return works associated with Latchford.<ref name="WashPost"/> The National Gallery of Australia claimed that a piece tied to Latchford was the subject of a live investigation, whilst the ] refused to engage with the journalists.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/10/05/museums-response-pandora-papers-antiquities/|work=The Washington Post|title=Responses from museums to Pandora Papers antiquities investigation|date=6 October 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> In November 2021, after rising pressure from the United States federal government, the ] agreed to voluntarily repatriate four Cambodian antiquities in their possession, which included three Khmer sandstone sculptures dating back to the 7th and 12th centuries, respectively, and an Iron Age Dong Son bronze bell.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.denverpost.com/2021/11/08/denver-art-museum-cambodian-antiquities-forfeiture|work=]|title=Denver Art Museum gives up looted Cambodian antiquities as feds seek forfeiture|first=Sam|last=Tabachnik|date=8 November 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref>


== Repatriation of collection == == Repatriation of collection ==
Two years before Latchford's death, his daughter Nawapan Kriangsak had initiated discussions to return the whole collection, valued at over $50m, to be exhibited at the ] as the Latchford Collection.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/29/arts/design/cambodia-artifacts-douglas-latchford.html|work=The New York Times|title=With a Gift of Art, a Daughter Honors, if Not Absolves, Her Father|first=Tom|last=Mashberg|date=29 January 2021|access-date=12 May 2022|issn=0362-4331}}{{paywall}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://news.artnet.com/art-world/collectors-daughter-repatriated-khmer-antiquities-likely-looted-cambodia-1940783|work=Artnet|title=The Daughter of a Collector Charged With Trafficking Looted Antiquities Has Returned Her Father's $50 Million Hoard to Cambodia|first=Sarah|last=Cascone|date=1 February 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> The transfer of ownership was completed on 18 September 2020:<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/daughter-antiquities-trafficker-returns-stunning-collection-khmer-dynasty-artifacts-cambodia-180976900/|work=]|title=Collection of Antiquities Dealer Accused of Looting Will Return to Cambodia|first=Nora|last=McGreevy|date=2 February 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://akp.gov.kh/post/detail/226055|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210130051131/https://www.akp.gov.kh/post/detail/226055|archive-date=30 January 2021|work=Agence Kampuchea Presse|title=Ministry of Culture Confirms the Return of Khmer Cultural Objects|date=30 January 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> however, progress in returning the collection stalled following the release of the ], which revealed that the family had attempted to avoid paying ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/05/offshore-trusts-used-pass-on-looted-khmer-treasures-leak-shows-douglas-latchford|work=The Guardian|title=Offshore loot: how notorious dealer used trusts to hoard Khmer treasures|first=David|last=Conn|date=5 October 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> Two years before Latchford's death, his daughter Nawapan Kriangsak had initiated discussions to return the whole collection, valued at over $50m, to be exhibited at the ] as the Latchford Collection.<ref name="NYT Mashberg"/><ref>{{cite news|url=https://news.artnet.com/art-world/collectors-daughter-repatriated-khmer-antiquities-likely-looted-cambodia-1940783|work=Artnet|title=The Daughter of a Collector Charged With Trafficking Looted Antiquities Has Returned Her Father's $50 Million Hoard to Cambodia|first=Sarah|last=Cascone|date=1 February 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> The transfer of ownership was completed on 18 September 2020:<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/daughter-antiquities-trafficker-returns-stunning-collection-khmer-dynasty-artifacts-cambodia-180976900/|work=]|title=Collection of Antiquities Dealer Accused of Looting Will Return to Cambodia|first=Nora|last=McGreevy|date=2 February 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://akp.gov.kh/post/detail/226055|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210130051131/https://www.akp.gov.kh/post/detail/226055|archive-date=30 January 2021|work=Agence Kampuchea Presse|title=Ministry of Culture Confirms the Return of Khmer Cultural Objects|date=30 January 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref> however, progress in returning the collection stalled following the release of the ], which revealed that the family had attempted to avoid paying ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/05/offshore-trusts-used-pass-on-looted-khmer-treasures-leak-shows-douglas-latchford|work=The Guardian|title=Offshore loot: how notorious dealer used trusts to hoard Khmer treasures|first=David|last=Conn|date=5 October 2021|access-date=12 May 2022}}</ref>


==Selected publications== ==Selected publications==

Revision as of 05:26, 13 May 2022

British art dealer

Douglas Arthur Joseph Latchford (15 October 1931 – 2 August 2020) was a British art dealer and alleged smuggler.

Biography

Latchford was born on 15 October 1931 in Mumbai, India, which was at the time under the British Raj. He was educated at Brighton College in England before returning to India shortly before Independence.

Latchford initially worked in the pharmaceutical industry in Mumbai. He moved to Bangkok in 1956, and in 1963 established a drug distribution company. Latchford also invested profitably in Thailand land development and became a Thai citizen in 1968. He was briefly married to a Thai woman and took a Thai name, Pakpong Kriangsak.

A long-time devotee of the sport of bodybuilding, Latchford became a patron of the sport in Thailand and was the honorary president of the Thai Bodybuilding Association from 2016 until his death.

Antiquities trade

A controversial figure, Latchford was best known as a collector of Cambodian antiquities. According to his obituary in The New York Times, Latchford was "a cultured accumulator of museum-quality Khmer sculptures and jewels", whilst The Diplomat reported that, due to his leading position in the illegal antiquities trade of the Khmer Rouge, "no single figure looms as large over a nation’s wholesale pillage." Nonetheless, the Cambodian government awarded Latchford a Grand Cross of the Royal Order of Monisaraphon in 2008. He co-authored three books on Khmer antiquities with academic Emma Bunker.

In the 1970s, Latchford became one of the leading suppliers of Cambodian art, selling to museums and private collections in Europe and North America, including the Metropolitan. He kept the best pieces for himself and his personal collection is rumored to rival that of the National Museum of Cambodia. When his daughter inherited the collection and donated it in full to Cambodia, it contained 125 pieces and was valued at $50m. Latchford liked to see himself as saving works of art that had been abandoned and were at risk during Cambodia's turbulent civil wars, although this viewpoint was contrasted by academics who alleged that several of Latchford's antiquities lacked a clear provenance. Latchford denied any wrongdoing, and gathered his collection long before legislation barring Latchford's practice of buying directly from farmers and dealers in Thailand. He also insisted that if the antiquities were not removed from Cambodia, “they would likely have been shot up for target practice by the Khmer Rouge.” In November 2019, Latchford, by then comatose, was charged by prosecutors in New York with falsifying the provenance of Khmer works of art, but the case ended with his death.

In October 2021, a large investigation by media from the UK, USA, and Australia, working with the ICIJ, explored the prevalence of artworks that Latchford had traded to public museums and galleries. The media consortium focused on the books published by Latchford, sale records, museum records, and corporate documents from trust structures established by Latchford for inheritance purposes to identify 27 pieces linked to Latchford in prominent collections. It highlighted at least a dozen works of art linked to Latchford held by the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and another fifteen relics among the Denver Art Museum, the British Museum, Cleveland Museum of Art, and the National Gallery of Australia. The reporting also investigated donations and sales by collectors and dealers associated with Latchford, identifying works of art in, amongst others, the Brooklyn Museum, Asian Art Museum, National Gallery of Australia, and Art Gallery of NSW. Many of the museums and galleries responded to the journalists and provided statements in relation to the allegations, although none made any commitment to return works associated with Latchford. The National Gallery of Australia claimed that a piece tied to Latchford was the subject of a live investigation, whilst the Los Angeles County Museum of Art refused to engage with the journalists. In November 2021, after rising pressure from the United States federal government, the Denver Art Museum agreed to voluntarily repatriate four Cambodian antiquities in their possession, which included three Khmer sandstone sculptures dating back to the 7th and 12th centuries, respectively, and an Iron Age Dong Son bronze bell.

Repatriation of collection

Two years before Latchford's death, his daughter Nawapan Kriangsak had initiated discussions to return the whole collection, valued at over $50m, to be exhibited at the National Museum of Cambodia as the Latchford Collection. The transfer of ownership was completed on 18 September 2020: however, progress in returning the collection stalled following the release of the Pandora Papers, which revealed that the family had attempted to avoid paying UK Inheritance Tax.

Selected publications

References

  1. Jacobs, Julia; Mashberg, Tom (27 November 2019). "Antiquities Expert Charged With Trafficking in Cambodian Artifacts". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 May 2022.(subscription required)
  2. ^ Noce, Vincent (10 August 2020). "'Adventurer scholar Douglas Latchford dies in Bangkok, aged 89". The Art Newspaper. Archived from the original on 26 September 2020.
  3. Smith, Nicola; Ensor, Josie (15 August 2020). "Calls to repatriate relics after death of controversial British art dealer 'Dynamite Doug'". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 12 May 2022.(subscription required)
  4. ^ Mashberg, Tom (27 August 2020). "Douglas A.J. Latchford, Khmer Antiquities Expert, Dies at 88". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 May 2022.(subscription required)
  5. ^ Davis, Tess (21 August 2022). "Douglas Latchford: The Man Who Pillaged Cambodia". The Diplomat. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  6. ^ Mashberg, Tom (29 January 2021). "With a Gift of Art, a Daughter Honors, if Not Absolves, Her Father". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 12 May 2022.(subscription required)
  7. Cascone, Sarah (5 October 2021). "The Pandora Papers Leak Reveals How the Late Dealer Douglas Latchford Used Offshore Accounts to Sell Looted Cambodian Antiquities". Artnet. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  8. Conn, David; Politzer, Malia (5 October 2021). "Offshore loot: how notorious dealer used trusts to hoard Khmer treasures". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  9. ^ Whoriskey, Peter; Politzer, Malia; Reuter, Delphine; Woodman, Spencer (5 October 2021). "GLOBAL HUNT FOR LOOTED TREASURES LEADS TO OFFSHORE TRUSTS". The Washington Post. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  10. Davies, Anne (5 October 2021). "How artefacts linked to indicted dealer ended up in Australian galleries". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  11. "Responses from museums to Pandora Papers antiquities investigation". The Washington Post. 6 October 2021. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  12. Tabachnik, Sam (8 November 2021). "Denver Art Museum gives up looted Cambodian antiquities as feds seek forfeiture". The Denver Post. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  13. Cascone, Sarah (1 February 2021). "The Daughter of a Collector Charged With Trafficking Looted Antiquities Has Returned Her Father's $50 Million Hoard to Cambodia". Artnet. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  14. McGreevy, Nora (2 February 2021). "Collection of Antiquities Dealer Accused of Looting Will Return to Cambodia". Smithsonian. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  15. "Ministry of Culture Confirms the Return of Khmer Cultural Objects". Agence Kampuchea Presse. 30 January 2021. Archived from the original on 30 January 2021. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  16. Conn, David (5 October 2021). "Offshore loot: how notorious dealer used trusts to hoard Khmer treasures". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
Categories: