| Revision as of 10:53, 25 June 2022 editSkyring (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,595 edits →Your draft: ReplyTags: Reverted Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:44, 26 June 2022 edit undoAoidh (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators58,097 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on List of longest-reigning monarchs.Tags: Twinkle RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| :No. Read it, hmm? --] (]) 10:53, 25 June 2022 (UTC) | :No. Read it, hmm? --] (]) 10:53, 25 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
| == June 2022 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 02:44, 26 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:44, 26 June 2022
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Your draft
Hey there, you may have accidentally created Draft:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Indigenous place names in draft space rather than user/project space? Cheers MaxnaCarta (talk) 09:59, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- No. Read it, hmm? --Pete (talk) 10:53, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
Your recent editing history at List of longest-reigning monarchs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Aoidh (talk) 02:44, 26 June 2022 (UTC)