User talk:Grace E. Dougle: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:26, 20 February 2007 editZeraeph (talk \| contribs)5,776 edits →Business and Econ Project Work: Nonbp← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:04, 20 February 2007 edit undoZeraeph (talk \| contribs)5,776 edits →[]: commentNext edit →
Line 87:		Line 87:
	::Grace E. Dougle, many thanks for the star! Look forward to working with you! ] 02:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)		::Grace E. Dougle, many thanks for the star! Look forward to working with you! ] 02:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

	==]==		==]==

	If you want an article on this topic please find some real encyclopaedic information from sources that accord with ], ] and ]. Please see discussion on merging and redirect . --] 18:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)		If you want an article on this topic please find some real encyclopaedic information from sources that accord with ], ] and ]. Please see discussion on merging and redirect . --] 18:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

			:I am sorry, but you seem to be somewhat misinformed about both the book, and, at least one of, it's authors. Randy Kreger is, at best, trained as a Public Relations Officer, hardly an academic. The book is not supported by any scientific studies or "peer reviewed" in any academic sense. The book is agenda driven, verges, at times, upon incitment to hatred, and appears to be virtually unknown outside a tightly knit and rather self appointed online culture of psychology in it's loosest sense.

			:Regardless, if the concept of "Non-bp" is notable I am sure you will have no trouble in finding plenty of sources that are verifiable and from reliable sources with which to build a suitably encyclopaedic article. I can even get you started by informing you that a very well accredited academic called Michael J Formica seems to be writing a book on "counterborderline", I am not to sure how far progressed this is. --] 20:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:04, 20 February 2007

Welcome

Hello Grace E. Dougle! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 17:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Getting started
Misplaced Pages tutorial • The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting help
Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Misplaced Pages is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Building consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your user page looks familar! Also, PTSD

Is that my layout? :D If so , I hope you like it.

As far as the PTSD thing goes, the list that was added is not appropiate. While I appreciate sarcasm, you'll find few other people do. A lot of psychological articles on Misplaced Pages are messy, and I sort of gave up even trying back when I was editing from IPs, but the simplest thing to do is open up a straw poll. Anyone who knows anything about psychology or PTSD will know that list is both too broad and yet, too specific. --Elar a girl 01:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Section for strange remarks by user:DPeterson

Pls do not remove the tags unless you add a relevant citation. Doing so is not consistent with Misplaced Pages standards. DPeterson 23:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC) Reverting Bipolar article: Rather than continuing to revert what many editors feel is an inappropriate section, the proper Misplaced Pages practice would be to begin some dispute resolution process. I have done so, I hope you will participate and cooperate and not continue to merely revert the edits.DPeterson 13:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Answer: I'm speechless at your twisting things, but not surprised.--Grace E. Dougle 15:01, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Business and Econ Project Work

		The Business and Economics Barnstar
		You're a GREAT help to the Business and Economics Project -- please keep helping us! SueHay 03:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Grace E. Dougle, many thanks for the star! Look forward to working with you! SueHay 02:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Non-bp

If you want an article on this topic please find some real encyclopaedic information from sources that accord with WP:NOTE, WP:RS and WP:OR. Please see discussion on merging and redirect . --Zeraeph 18:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry, but you seem to be somewhat misinformed about both the book, and, at least one of, it's authors. Randy Kreger is, at best, trained as a Public Relations Officer, hardly an academic. The book is not supported by any scientific studies or "peer reviewed" in any academic sense. The book is agenda driven, verges, at times, upon incitment to hatred, and appears to be virtually unknown outside a tightly knit and rather self appointed online culture of psychology in it's loosest sense.

Regardless, if the concept of "Non-bp" is notable I am sure you will have no trouble in finding plenty of sources that are verifiable and from reliable sources with which to build a suitably encyclopaedic article. I can even get you started by informing you that a very well accredited academic called Michael J Formica seems to be writing a book on "counterborderline", I am not to sure how far progressed this is. --Zeraeph 20:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Category:

WelcomeBotResearch