| Revision as of 02:58, 29 June 2003 view sourceAdam Bishop (talk | contribs)Administrators53,514 editsm Links← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:10, 30 June 2003 view source Adam Bishop (talk | contribs)Administrators53,514 edits Expanding/editing so it doesn't sound so 1911-ishNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| The '''First Crusade''' was launched in ] to take back ] from the ]s, and to help the ] fight the ]. | |||
| ⚫ | As early as ], when ] passed into the hands of the ], ] had |
||
| ⚫ | As early as ], when ] passed into the hands of the ], ] had projected a war against the Muslims, which he hoped would also lead to reunion with the ]. However, the plan was thrust into the background by the conflict with the ] over ] and other matters. | ||
| ⚫ | ] (1088- |
||
| ⚫ | ] (]-]), who next took up the idea, was motivated not so much by the political considerations of Gregory as by actual religious impulse. From the Church should come the impelling force; on the secular powers rested the actual execution of the plan. Before this, the ] had engaged in conflict with the Muslims in ] and the ] were continuously fighting the ] in the ]. Therefore, the conception of a crusade against the Muslim world was no absolute novelty to the nations of the West. | ||
| ⚫ | The Byzantine emperor ] was quite aware of this when he turned to Urban for aid against the Turks in |
||
| ⚫ | The Byzantine emperor ] was quite aware of this when he turned to Urban for aid against the Turks at ] in ]. His request met with a favourable response from Church, as well as from the noble knights of Western Europe with their lust for adventure and conquest. When the Greek ambassadors arrived Urban was preparing for the ]; there the Pope first preached the crusade on ], 1095, in words which have not come down, but which apparently stirred the crowd to frenzied enthusiasm. | ||
| ⚫ | The number of those who assumed the crusader's cross increased daily, and the movement, soon passing beyond papal restraint, seized upon the lower classes. |
||
| ⚫ | The number of those who assumed the crusader's cross increased daily, and the movement, soon passing beyond papal restraint, seized upon the lower classes. Peasants exchanged plows for arms and were joined by the dissatisfied, the oppressed, and the outcast; members of the lower clergy, runaway ]s, women, and children joined this popular mob, recognizing no leader but ]. | ||
| This undercurrent of opposition to the pope gave rise to the legend, which is still current, that not Urban, but Peter the Hermit (Peter of Amiens) was the true representative of the crusading idea. Peter was one of the leaders of the fanatical bands, whose contribution to the enterprise was a story of an alleged personal appearance of Jesus, giving him commission to acquaint Christendom with the sad condition of the Holy Land. After the wildest excesses, in which the Jews appear as the principal sufferers at their hands, these tumultuous hosts found a pitiful end in Hungary and beyond the Bosporus. | |||
| These events led to the legend that not Urban, but ] of ] was the true representative of the crusading idea. Peter was one of the leaders of the fanatical bands, whose contribution to the enterprise was a story of an alleged personal appearance of Jesus. According to Peter, Jesus had given him a letter describing the sad condition of the Holy Land, and commanding Peter to lead an army to re-establish Christian power there. Conveniently, most of Peter's followers were at best semi-literate. Peter also had the support of the knight ], who, as his name suggests, was an impoverished ] with no lord and no vassals. Their unarmed, unorganized army had little idea of the world outside their own lands, and at every city of any great size they believed they had arrived at Jerusalem. Their march was filled with wild excesses; the ]s were their principal targets, many communities being slaughtered along the ] with the help of ]. On their way down the ], the mob attacked ], ], and anyone else they suspected of being a heathen, and were massacred before they even reached ]. Peter survived, however, and would later join the main Crusader army. | |||
| The real crusading armies set out in 1096. The main contingents were men of Lorraine under the brothers Godfrey of Bouillon and ] and Baldwin of Boulogne; Flemings under Count Robert II of Flanders; | |||
| northern French under Robert of Normandy (older brother of King ]), Stephen of Blois, and Hugh of Vermandois (younger brother of King ]); Provencals under ]; and Normans of Italy under ] and Tancred. The Christian cause suffered from dissensions among the leaders, and it had to contend against the machinations of ], who was roused to a sense of danger to his realm by the presence of the Western armies. | |||
| The real armies set out in ]. The main contingents were men of ] under the brothers ], ] and ]; ]s under Count Robert II of ]; northern French under Robert of Normandy (older brother of King ]), Stephen of Blois, and Hugh of Vermandois (younger brother of King ]); ] under ]; and Normans of ] under ] and Tancred. There was some dissension among the leaders, especially over who was the actual leader, though Urban himself appointed his legate ] overall leader. The army also had to contend against the wishes of ], who was understandably suspicious of a massive army which included many of his old Norman enemies. Alexius would not let them leave until the various leaders had sworn ] to him, and had them promise to return to the Byzantine Empire any land they recovered from the Seljuks; these oaths would quickly be broken once the Crusaders crossed into Asia Minor. | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ], capital of the Seljuk "Sultan of Rum" ],was taken in early ], and ] himself was defeated at ]. The Crusaders then marched across Asia Minor. At this point Baldwin of Boulogne set off on his own towards the ]n lands around the Euphrates. In Edessa he was adopted as heir by King ], a Greek Orthodox ruler who was disliked by his Armenian subjects. Thoros was soon assassinated and Baldwin became the new ruler; the city became the ], the first of the Crusader states. | |||
| ⚫ | The kingdom drew strength from the influx of new crusading forces, from the presence of the Italian merchants who established themselves in the Syrian ports, and from the religious and military orders of the ] and the ]. | ||
| The main Crusader army, meanwhile, marched on to ], which was captured after a long siege on ], ]. According to legend, an army of Christian ]s, including the ]s who had been killed at Nicaea and Dorylaeum, routed the Turks outside the city, allowing for the success of the siege. Almost immediately, an army from ] arrived to besiege the newly conquered city; on ] Antioch was successfully defended against this army thanks largely to the efforts of Bohemond, who claimed the city for himself as ]. | |||
| ⚫ | After a break, the rest of the Crusader army marched on to Jerusalem, which had, in the meanwhile, been recaptured by the ] of Egypt. After a lengthy siege in which the Crusaders probably suffered more than the citizens of the city, Jerusalem was taken by deception on ], ]; one of the guards, a former Christian, felt sympathy for the Crusaders and opened a gate for them. The Crusaders massacred the whole Muslim and Jewish population, men, women and children. The Jews were burned alive in their main synagogue where they had fled; the Muslims were slaughtered in the ], and according to the accounts their blood ran ankle-deep. In the days following the massacre, Godfrey of Bouillon was made ''Protector of the ], refusing to take be named king in the city where Christ had died. In the last action of the Crusade, he led an army which defeated an invading Fatimid army at ]. Godfrey died in July, ], and was succeeded by his brother, ] of Edessa, who took the title of "King of Jerusalem". Baldwin and his successors, ] (d. 1131), and ] (d. 1143), extended the boundaries of the ] through successful warfare. | ||
| ⚫ | The new kingdom drew strength from the influx of new crusading forces in ], from the presence of the ] merchants who established themselves in the Syrian ports, and from the religious and military orders of the ] and the ] which were created during Baldwin I's reign. | ||
| :''See also:'' ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | :''See also:'' ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | ||
Revision as of 23:10, 30 June 2003
The First Crusade was launched in 1099 to take back Jerusalem from the Muslims, and to help the Byzantine Empire fight the Seljuk Turks.
As early as 1074, when Asia Minor passed into the hands of the Seljuk Turks, Pope Gregory VII had projected a war against the Muslims, which he hoped would also lead to reunion with the Greek Church. However, the plan was thrust into the background by the conflict with the emperor Henry IV over investiture and other matters.
Pope Urban II (1088-1099), who next took up the idea, was motivated not so much by the political considerations of Gregory as by actual religious impulse. From the Church should come the impelling force; on the secular powers rested the actual execution of the plan. Before this, the Normans had engaged in conflict with the Muslims in Sicily and the Spanish were continuously fighting the Moors in the Iberian peninsula. Therefore, the conception of a crusade against the Muslim world was no absolute novelty to the nations of the West.
The Byzantine emperor Alexius I was quite aware of this when he turned to Urban for aid against the Turks at Piacenza in 1095. His request met with a favourable response from Church, as well as from the noble knights of Western Europe with their lust for adventure and conquest. When the Greek ambassadors arrived Urban was preparing for the Council of Clermont; there the Pope first preached the crusade on November 26, 1095, in words which have not come down, but which apparently stirred the crowd to frenzied enthusiasm.
The number of those who assumed the crusader's cross increased daily, and the movement, soon passing beyond papal restraint, seized upon the lower classes. Peasants exchanged plows for arms and were joined by the dissatisfied, the oppressed, and the outcast; members of the lower clergy, runaway monks, women, and children joined this popular mob, recognizing no leader but God.
These events led to the legend that not Urban, but Peter the Hermit of Amiens was the true representative of the crusading idea. Peter was one of the leaders of the fanatical bands, whose contribution to the enterprise was a story of an alleged personal appearance of Jesus. According to Peter, Jesus had given him a letter describing the sad condition of the Holy Land, and commanding Peter to lead an army to re-establish Christian power there. Conveniently, most of Peter's followers were at best semi-literate. Peter also had the support of the knight Walter the Penniless, who, as his name suggests, was an impoverished knight with no lord and no vassals. Their unarmed, unorganized army had little idea of the world outside their own lands, and at every city of any great size they believed they had arrived at Jerusalem. Their march was filled with wild excesses; the Jews were their principal targets, many communities being slaughtered along the Rhine with the help of Emich of Leningen. On their way down the Danube, the mob attacked Hugarians, Slavs, and anyone else they suspected of being a heathen, and were massacred before they even reached Constantinople. Peter survived, however, and would later join the main Crusader army.
The real armies set out in 1096. The main contingents were men of Lorraine under the brothers Godfrey of Bouillon, Eustace and Baldwin of Boulogne; Flemings under Count Robert II of Flanders; northern French under Robert of Normandy (older brother of King William II of England), Stephen of Blois, and Hugh of Vermandois (younger brother of King Philip I of France); Provencals under Raymond of Toulouse; and Normans of Italy under Bohemund of Taranto and Tancred. There was some dissension among the leaders, especially over who was the actual leader, though Urban himself appointed his legate Adhemar of Le Puy overall leader. The army also had to contend against the wishes of Alexius I, who was understandably suspicious of a massive army which included many of his old Norman enemies. Alexius would not let them leave until the various leaders had sworn fealty to him, and had them promise to return to the Byzantine Empire any land they recovered from the Seljuks; these oaths would quickly be broken once the Crusaders crossed into Asia Minor.
Nicaea, capital of the Seljuk "Sultan of Rum" Kilij Arslan I,was taken in early 1097, and Kilij Arslan himself was defeated at Dorylaeum. The Crusaders then marched across Asia Minor. At this point Baldwin of Boulogne set off on his own towards the Armenian lands around the Euphrates. In Edessa he was adopted as heir by King Thoros, a Greek Orthodox ruler who was disliked by his Armenian subjects. Thoros was soon assassinated and Baldwin became the new ruler; the city became the County of Edessa, the first of the Crusader states.
The main Crusader army, meanwhile, marched on to Antioch, which was captured after a long siege on June 3, 1098. According to legend, an army of Christian saints, including the martyrs who had been killed at Nicaea and Dorylaeum, routed the Turks outside the city, allowing for the success of the siege. Almost immediately, an army from Mosul arrived to besiege the newly conquered city; on June 28 Antioch was successfully defended against this army thanks largely to the efforts of Bohemond, who claimed the city for himself as Prince of Antioch.
After a break, the rest of the Crusader army marched on to Jerusalem, which had, in the meanwhile, been recaptured by the Fatimids of Egypt. After a lengthy siege in which the Crusaders probably suffered more than the citizens of the city, Jerusalem was taken by deception on July 15, 1099; one of the guards, a former Christian, felt sympathy for the Crusaders and opened a gate for them. The Crusaders massacred the whole Muslim and Jewish population, men, women and children. The Jews were burned alive in their main synagogue where they had fled; the Muslims were slaughtered in the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and according to the accounts their blood ran ankle-deep. In the days following the massacre, Godfrey of Bouillon was made Protector of the Holy Sepulchre, refusing to take be named king in the city where Christ had died. In the last action of the Crusade, he led an army which defeated an invading Fatimid army at Ascalon. Godfrey died in July, 1100, and was succeeded by his brother, Baldwin of Edessa, who took the title of "King of Jerusalem". Baldwin and his successors, Baldwin II (d. 1131), and Fulk (d. 1143), extended the boundaries of the Kingdom of Jerusalem through successful warfare.
The new kingdom drew strength from the influx of new crusading forces in 1101, from the presence of the Italian merchants who established themselves in the Syrian ports, and from the religious and military orders of the Knights Templars and the Knights of St. John which were created during Baldwin I's reign.