| Revision as of 10:41, 22 February 2007 editEvan C (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,152 edits Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:21, 22 February 2007 edit undoEvan C (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,152 edits FurtherNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| :(message to 208.113....) I'd say I have good reason to call the placement of irrelevant, non-NPoV, misquoted, and improperly cited content vandalism in itself. However, thus far I have assumed good faith, and haven't called it such. The text I removed doesn't belong on the ] article, not in its current form, at least. The reasons are specified on ]. Feel free to discuss it there - the general method in a dispute is to remove the text in question, discuss until a consensus is reached, and ''then'' to put the content back. | :(message to 208.113....) I'd say I have good reason to call the placement of irrelevant, non-NPoV, misquoted, and improperly cited content vandalism in itself. However, thus far I have assumed good faith, and haven't called it such. The text I removed doesn't belong on the ] article, not in its current form, at least. The reasons are specified on ]. Feel free to discuss it there - the general method in a dispute is to remove the text in question, discuss until a consensus is reached, and ''then'' to put the content back. | ||
| Finally, I don't particularly like being "warned" for "vandalism" that I've not committed. Please try to be constructive. --] (]) 10:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | :Finally, I don't particularly like being "warned" for "vandalism" that I've not committed. Please try to be constructive. --] (]) 10:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::Repeatedly calling the removal of text that arguably should not be on Misplaced Pages ''vandalism'' is getting you nowhere. Like I said above, please be constructive and discuss the issue at hand. | |||
Revision as of 12:21, 22 February 2007
Please DO NOT assume bad faith.See
Help:Reverting Especially the Revert Wars Part. And see Misplaced Pages:Assume good faith Warnings are a privilage,do not abuse your right.
Please go to the discussion Page and Talk there.STOP THE CYCLE OF REVERTING!121.7.56.203 10:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- (message to 208.113....) I'd say I have good reason to call the placement of irrelevant, non-NPoV, misquoted, and improperly cited content vandalism in itself. However, thus far I have assumed good faith, and haven't called it such. The text I removed doesn't belong on the Railpage Australia article, not in its current form, at least. The reasons are specified on Talk: Railpage Australia. Feel free to discuss it there - the general method in a dispute is to remove the text in question, discuss until a consensus is reached, and then to put the content back.
- Finally, I don't particularly like being "warned" for "vandalism" that I've not committed. Please try to be constructive. --Evan C (Talk) 10:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Repeatedly calling the removal of text that arguably should not be on Misplaced Pages vandalism is getting you nowhere. Like I said above, please be constructive and discuss the issue at hand.