Misplaced Pages

User talk:Yanksox: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:23, 23 February 2007 editDoc glasgow (talk | contribs)26,084 edits []: ::He seems to have gone for now - we are currently discussing this on DRV, perhaps you'd like to contribute to that.--~~~~← Previous edit Revision as of 16:32, 23 February 2007 edit undoFreakofnurture (talk | contribs)36,981 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
:Umm... WTF is going on? I can understand the desire to get rid of that cesspool, but unilaterally deleting the article ''and'' the talk is not the way. Can you provide any reason why I shouldn't undelete? ] | ] 15:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC) :Umm... WTF is going on? I can understand the desire to get rid of that cesspool, but unilaterally deleting the article ''and'' the talk is not the way. Can you provide any reason why I shouldn't undelete? ] | ] 15:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
::He seems to have gone for now - we are currently discussing this on DRV, perhaps you'd like to contribute to that.--]<sup>g</sup> 15:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC) ::He seems to have gone for now - we are currently discussing this on DRV, perhaps you'd like to contribute to that.--]<sup>g</sup> 15:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

If there is any sentence, any word in that entire article that violates BLP, please point it out. The article itself is not libellous, but the personal attacks you made in deleting it are quite offensive. —<tt class="plainlinks">''']()'''</tt> 16:32, Feb. 23, 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:32, 23 February 2007

.....And I just came here to give you a barnstar for your boldness and humanity--Doc 13:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)



About bloody time too. And, when it stays dead, I'll know Misplaced Pages has matured!--Doc 13:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Daniel Brandt

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Daniel Brandt. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Cat out 14:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Umm... WTF is going on? I can understand the desire to get rid of that cesspool, but unilaterally deleting the article and the talk is not the way. Can you provide any reason why I shouldn't undelete? Zocky | picture popups 15:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
He seems to have gone for now - we are currently discussing this on DRV, perhaps you'd like to contribute to that.--Doc 15:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

If there is any sentence, any word in that entire article that violates BLP, please point it out. The article itself is not libellous, but the personal attacks you made in deleting it are quite offensive. —freak(talk) 16:32, Feb. 23, 2007 (UTC)