| Revision as of 02:31, 2 September 2022 editButlerblog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers122,935 edits →Twelve Tribes Communities ArticleTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:24, 2 September 2022 edit undo98.103.253.178 (talk) →Twelve Tribes Communities Article: Add to discussion.Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| ::Are you denying that you were edit warring? ] (]) 31 August 2022 (UTC) | ::Are you denying that you were edit warring? ] (]) 31 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :::Are you trying to escalate this to something that it doesn't need to be? ] (]) 13:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC) | :::Are you trying to escalate this to something that it doesn't need to be? ] (]) 13:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
| This seems rather dishonest. I started this topic, then someone else added (meaning there is consensus), then I added more and now this editor removes my contributions, making it as though this is just one person only who is discussing something totally different. There seems to be a number of arrogant folks on Misplaced Pages, who become very offended when someone criticized them. | |||
Revision as of 20:24, 2 September 2022
 | Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
 |
|
Why the revert to National Electrical Code 100 Volts Topic?
Hi apparently some idiot was here a while ago making stupid edits. For a good reason the IP address was blocked and for a good reason the block was temporary. Now I go write something that is very reasonable about the electrical industry on the National Electrical Code page and you revert it saying that it’s not constructive. The version that you reverted it to is not constructive and therefore your edit is not constructive. What was placed there about 100 V and less is completely false and is not in any way covered by the national electrical code. So I made the article better by removing incorrect and unsighted information and you came back and restored the incorrect and unsubstantiated information. There was a reason for the block in there was also a reason that the block was temporary. And it seems that by trying to make your own rules where you are attempting to make a block permanent by reverting anything someone from an IP address says in contravention to what the administrator decided, you are actually causing Misplaced Pages to have incorrect information on it by reverting edits. There’s a very good reason why when a user does stupid things we may block them permanently but when an IP address does stupid things we may be more apt to make that block temporary because of the inability to control who’s using the IP address.
50.225.122.226 (talk) 00:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- @50.225.122.226: Then I'll expect that we won't be seeing any "
stupid edits
" from you. ButlerBlog (talk) 01:40, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Popular pages report
Hi Butlerblog: I added a "List" section to the "Westerns/Television popular pages" page you set up last month. Unfortunately, without a section to put its output into, the report doesn't generate. Here's the link to the troubleshooting page that explains this. Ours didn't work either, which is how I discovered it. Oh well – maybe NEXT month! MeegsC (talk) 07:29, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- @MeegsC: Thanks - that would explain why Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Westerns/Popular_pages generated and the television one didn't. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Twelve Tribes Communities Article
Hello Butlerblog please stop edit warring at Twelve Tribes communities. You are currently engaged in an edit war over an obscure part of WP:REPCITE which itself at the top of the page says clearly it is not mandatory and does not have universal agreement. You are edit warring against WP:INTEGRITY#Keeping citations close which is a content guideline. It does say that it should either be followed or discussed if there is reason to not follow it. Please use the Talk: instead of edit warring. Invasive Spices (talk) 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Invasive Spices: Don't come at me with accusations of edit warring. You could have opened this discussion up an entirely different way. Instead, you've chosen to do it in a way that comes across as not . Reverting your changes with valid reasons is not edit warring. ButlerBlog (talk) 13:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Are you denying that you were edit warring? Invasive Spices (talk) 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Are you trying to escalate this to something that it doesn't need to be? ButlerBlog (talk) 13:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Are you denying that you were edit warring? Invasive Spices (talk) 31 August 2022 (UTC)
This seems rather dishonest. I started this topic, then someone else added (meaning there is consensus), then I added more and now this editor removes my contributions, making it as though this is just one person only who is discussing something totally different. There seems to be a number of arrogant folks on Misplaced Pages, who become very offended when someone criticized them.