| Revision as of 02:40, 5 September 2022 editQwaiiplayer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,116 edits General note: Unconstructive editing on O. J. Howard.Tag: Twinkle | Revision as of 19:49, 5 September 2022 edit undoQwaiiplayer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,116 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on O.J. Howard.Tag: TwinkleNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of ], such as the edit(s) you made to ], did not appear to be constructive and have been ]. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our ]. You can find information about these at our ] which also provides further information about ]. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the ] for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> ] (]) 02:40, 5 September 2022 (UTC) | ] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of ], such as the edit(s) you made to ], did not appear to be constructive and have been ]. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our ]. You can find information about these at our ] which also provides further information about ]. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the ] for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> ] (]) 02:40, 5 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
| {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 19:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
Revision as of 19:49, 5 September 2022
September 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to O. J. Howard, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 02:40, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at O.J. Howard shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 19:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.