| Revision as of 04:00, 10 February 2007 editMatthew238 (talk | contribs)2,354 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:41, 25 February 2007 edit undo68.88.143.225 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| In the ] of the ], '''contempt of Congress''' is the ] of ] the work of ], with a ] of up to one year in prison and up to $1,000 in ]s. | ''<nowiki>In the ] of the ], '''contempt of Congress''' is the ] of ] the work of ], with a ] of up to one year in prison and up to $1,000 in ]s. | ||
| The United States Congress generally brings this action for refusing to testify before a ], or failing to provide a committee with requested documents. There have also been contempt cases based on bribing a ] or ]. | The United States Congress generally brings this action for refusing to testify before a ], or failing to provide a committee with requested documents. There have also been contempt cases based on bribing a ] or ]. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ]</nowiki>'' | ||
Revision as of 22:41, 25 February 2007
In the ] of the ], '''contempt of Congress''' is the ] of ] the work of ], with a ] of up to one year in prison and up to $1,000 in ]s. The United States Congress generally brings this action for refusing to testify before a ], or failing to provide a committee with requested documents. There have also been contempt cases based on bribing a ] or ]. In order for someone to be convicted of contempt of Congress, the congressional committee which has suffered the contempt first reports a resolution that the affected individual is guilty of contempt. This takes a majority vote of the committee. The full ] or ] then must approve the resolution, which sends the matter to an assistant United States attorney or higher with the Department of Justice, who may call a ] to decide whether to ] the affected individual, and ] if the grand jury affirms an indictment. This version of the procedure was put into place in ] and exists in order to provide a balance of power so the House and Senate cannot run amok and jail all their political opponents with contempt charges, also to be within the restrictions laid out in the United States Constitution that Congress cannot pass a ], and declare someone criminally guilty without trial. The Congress is also restricted in that contempt citations can only be brought on matters that relate to legislative purposes within the jurisdiction of the committee that brings the charges. From time to time, Congress lodges contempt of Congress charges against members of the United States government, usually members of the ] of the United States who claim that releasing their records to a committee would cause more harm than good, or sometimes that the records are protected by ] and must remain secret. This can put the executive branch in an unusual ethical position, since the executive branch employs the ], who decides whether to bring cases of contempt of Congress to the grand jury. In addition, it is often the United States Attorney who advises executive branch members in the first place whether to withhold controversial documents or provide them to the congressional committees. For example, ], ], and ] have all been cited by Congress for contempt, though in all these cases the Congress and the executive branch subsequently reached an agreement on the delivery of documents before the matter reached a grand jury. In cases involving delivery of documents, Congress currently seems to view contempt of Congress as a tool to reach an agreement with the executive branch, rather than as a law to punish the contemptuous. Various ]s have statewide contempt of Congress crimes on the books, in those cases for obstructing the work of the ]. ] is an example of this. Similarly, in some counties and cities, it is a violation of local ordinances to interfere in like manner with the proceedings of the county board of supervisors or the city council. ==See also== * ] ] ]