| Revision as of 18:22, 7 September 2022 editLJstats (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users635 edits →Request for comment on average heightTag: Manual revert← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:37, 9 September 2022 edit undoOhnoitsjamie (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators261,297 edits warnTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| :::At an event like high jump or pole vault you would get littered by secondary marks. Many athletes have equaled their personal best a dozen times.] (]) 14:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | :::At an event like high jump or pole vault you would get littered by secondary marks. Many athletes have equaled their personal best a dozen times.] (]) 14:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
| ::::I'm not a fan of ignore equal marks and ancillary jumps and throws. Just think of Crowsers big ancillary shot put throws (23.01 m, 23.11 m) in his last series in Eugene. This kind of stats f.e. also don't do justice to Duplantis' dominance in the pole vault.] (]) 15:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | ::::I'm not a fan of ignore equal marks and ancillary jumps and throws. Just think of Crowsers big ancillary shot put throws (23.01 m, 23.11 m) in his last series in Eugene. This kind of stats f.e. also don't do justice to Duplantis' dominance in the pole vault.] (]) 15:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
| ==Edit warring== | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. | |||
| Points to note: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> <b>] ]</b> 21:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:37, 9 September 2022
CyberLeninka
That a paper is hosted on CyberLeninka is nothing special, that's like a paper being hosted on ResearchGate or Zenodo. Those are general unfiltered repositories where you can upload pretty much anything.
The actual publisher of this journal is the "Eurasian Union of Scientists", which is a predatory publisher. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:55, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
100 metres
Record runs with the same time are worth mentioning no less than the time of the first run. They also count as records.Montell 74 (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I get your argument but we should follow World Athletics standards.LJstats (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- To your information, Bracy ran 9.85 on three different occasions.LJstats (talk) 14:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- At an event like high jump or pole vault you would get littered by secondary marks. Many athletes have equaled their personal best a dozen times.LJstats (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not a fan of ignore equal marks and ancillary jumps and throws. Just think of Crowsers big ancillary shot put throws (23.01 m, 23.11 m) in his last series in Eugene. This kind of stats f.e. also don't do justice to Duplantis' dominance in the pole vault.Montell 74 (talk) 15:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- At an event like high jump or pole vault you would get littered by secondary marks. Many athletes have equaled their personal best a dozen times.LJstats (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- To your information, Bracy ran 9.85 on three different occasions.LJstats (talk) 14:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie 21:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)