| Revision as of 17:53, 9 September 2022 editSitush (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers260,192 edits →Raj Era caste sources: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:09, 12 September 2022 edit undo2409:4073:48d:7ef7:6cbf:c8cc:557f:7bf6 (talk) →Censoring: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
| The Arbitration Committee is considering an unban appeal from {{User|Lightbreather}}. You are being notified as you participated in the last unban discussion. You may give feedback ]. For the Arbitration Committee, ] (]) 15:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC) | The Arbitration Committee is considering an unban appeal from {{User|Lightbreather}}. You are being notified as you participated in the last unban discussion. You may give feedback ]. For the Arbitration Committee, ] (]) 15:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
| {{You've got mail}} ] (]) 18:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC) | {{You've got mail}} ] (]) 18:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
| == Censoring == | |||
| , who I believe is a possible sock of accounts editing Ezhava talk page and related pages, is now censoring the caste at ]. The article was tampered and content was not as per the given citations. Please keep as eye on. ] (]) 13:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:09, 12 September 2022
 | An editor thinks something might be wrong with this page. They can't be arsed to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Caste promotion account
Hello, please look at this user he is editing majority particular caste related articles and is heavily using doubtful references. He is Rajput promoting account only. Check his contributions.
War article without any authentic source
Please once see this Battle of Mandan page. Not a single source looks credible. 2 out of 3 the sources are even low rated on Google books and one is by a caste historian.
References
1) Hooja, Rima (2006). A History of Rajasthan. Rupa and company.
2) Sinh, Ranbir (2001). History of Shekhawats. p. 280.
3) Meharda, B.L. Territory, Polity, and Status- A Study of Shekhawats.
Here 1st source is from some Rupa company, other 2 are from caste writers not credible historians.
This whole article is a propoganda against reality. Please User:Sitush check it.
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Sitush! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU 20:23, 3 July 2022 (UTC) |  |
Raj Era caste sources
Any opinions on this ethnolographic survey from 1913, edited by Denys Bray? An editor is trying to use it to add contentious material to Arora. OhNoitsJamie 18:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie : no Raj era sources are deemed to be reliable. There is a brief explanation regarding this on one of my userspace pages. I am on mobile & can't remember which one! Maybe User:Sitush/CasteSources. Sorry for the delay in responding. - Sitush (talk) 14:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie, Denys Bray falls under User:Sitush/CasteSources#Writings_of_British_Raj_administrators hence he is not reliable for opinions on caste. We do use some Raj era sources for noncontentious issues or if the source is a scholar or an academic source. For example Jadunath Sarkar or Irawati Karve but not the nationalist historians especially those who supported the aryan race theory. If I understand Sitush's page correctly, the blanket ban is on the administrators since they had no formal training to give opinion on caste or history of a caste.LukeEmily (talk) 15:14, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- @LukeEmily well, yes, there may always be idiosyncratic exceptions to the rule. FWIW, I certainly don't think Sarkar is up to the mark by today's standards, however lauded he was by his contemporaries & still is by those castes whom he glorified. He's probably no better than the once-esteemed G. M. Trevelyan; both of them are now history themselves. - Sitush (talk) 17:53, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie, Denys Bray falls under User:Sitush/CasteSources#Writings_of_British_Raj_administrators hence he is not reliable for opinions on caste. We do use some Raj era sources for noncontentious issues or if the source is a scholar or an academic source. For example Jadunath Sarkar or Irawati Karve but not the nationalist historians especially those who supported the aryan race theory. If I understand Sitush's page correctly, the blanket ban is on the administrators since they had no formal training to give opinion on caste or history of a caste.LukeEmily (talk) 15:14, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Habibzai for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Habibzai is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Habibzai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
BeReasonabl (talk) 12:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Lightbreather appeal
The Arbitration Committee is considering an unban appeal from Lightbreather (talk · contribs). You are being notified as you participated in the last unban discussion. You may give feedback here. For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Barkeep49 (talk) 18:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Censoring
This user, who I believe is a possible sock of accounts editing Ezhava talk page and related pages, is now censoring the caste at Nangeli. The article was tampered and content was not as per the given citations. Please keep as eye on. 2409:4073:48D:7EF7:6CBF:C8CC:557F:7BF6 (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC)