Misplaced Pages

User talk:Alx xlA/Essays/Why Heavy Bombers Are Not Useful Anymore: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Alx xlA Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:08, 16 July 2022 edit2601:700:8004:7290:91db:31c3:ba60:4423 (talk) This article: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit Revision as of 11:10, 14 September 2022 edit undoPlutonical (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,153 edits This article: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


The publication of uninformative, one sided drivel such as this is why I can't find it in myself to financially support wikipedia ] (]) 21:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC) The publication of uninformative, one sided drivel such as this is why I can't find it in myself to financially support wikipedia ] (]) 21:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

:Heavy bombers are indeed mostly useless. The closest thing to one the US has simply serves as a flying missile station.
:And yes, wikipedia articles will have to get shorter sometimes. Not everything is done best by one huge article. ]] 11:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:10, 14 September 2022

WikiProject iconMisplaced Pages essays Low‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Misplaced Pages essays, a collaborative effort to organize and monitor the impact of Misplaced Pages essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.Misplaced Pages essaysWikipedia:WikiProject Misplaced Pages essaysTemplate:WikiProject Misplaced Pages essaysWikiProject Misplaced Pages essays
LowThis page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

This article

The publication of uninformative, one sided drivel such as this is why I can't find it in myself to financially support wikipedia 2601:700:8004:7290:91DB:31C3:BA60:4423 (talk) 21:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Heavy bombers are indeed mostly useless. The closest thing to one the US has simply serves as a flying missile station.
And yes, wikipedia articles will have to get shorter sometimes. Not everything is done best by one huge article. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 11:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Categories: