| Revision as of 19:56, 15 September 2022 editPanchalidraupadi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,282 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:02, 16 September 2022 edit undoFostera12 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,665 edits →Adding promotional material: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
| Can you please review my draft? | Can you please review my draft? | ||
| Also you did edit the ] page. So why isn't it reviewed yet? ] (]) 11:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC) | Also you did edit the ] page. So why isn't it reviewed yet? ] (]) 11:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
| == Adding promotional material == | |||
| Some body kindly educate Mr. User talk:Jayanthkumar123 to stop promoting and advertising Telugu cinema whereever possible, out of context in the lead section of this article, adding factually inaccurate using predatory references. ] (]) 12:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:02, 16 September 2022
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
 Archives | ||||
Index
|
||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
The Signpost: 31 August 2022
- News and notes: Admins wanted on English Misplaced Pages, IP editors not wanted on Farsi Wiki, donations wanted everywhere
- Special report: Wikimania 2022: no show, no show up?
- In the media: Truth or consequences? A tough month for truth
- Discussion report: Boarding the Trustees
- News from Wiki Education: 18 years a Wikipedian: what it means to me
- In focus: Thinking inside the box
- Tips and tricks: The unexpected rabbit hole of typo fixing in citations...
- Technology report: Vector (2022) deployment discussions happening now
- Serendipity: Two photos of every library on earth
- Featured content: Our man drills are safe for work, but our Labia is Fausta.
- Recent research: The dollar value of "official" external links
- Traffic report: What dreams (and heavily trafficked articles) may come
- Essay: Delete the junk!
- Humour: CommonsComix No. 1
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago
New Page Reviewing
 |
| Hello, DaxServer.
I've seen you editing recently and you seem like an experienced Misplaced Pages editor. |
- I've noticed that you've been doing really well with your CSD and PROD requests. I think you might really enjoy New Page Patrol. Come check the page out, we have a great training program running which I completed and really enjoyed. If you have any questions please feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Dr vulpes 06:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Welcome back!
We missed you here, it's good to see you back anna. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi anna!! Nice to c u again. Two weeks back return avudam anukunna, but have too many things going around. Nice to be back again :) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bheemunipatnam revenue division (September 8)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bheemunipatnam revenue division and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, DaxServer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rollidan (talk) 21:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
Request on 16:22:44, 12 September 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Iam1947
My contribution has independent references from leading publishing websites in the world, yet you keep disapproving it. It is a valid ngo with global outreach and body of work. Could you please check it. It merits to be on wikipedia.
Iam1947 (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @Iam1947. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Re the article, it is evaluated on the lines of WP:NGO guidelines. From the references, I only see passing mentions of the FFOP in articles about the workshop and other announcements. They are not considered "significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization". If you were to provide references that discuss about the NGO which are also independent publications from FFOP, then the article could merit. Hope this is clear. If not, please visit WP:TEAHOUSE where other experienced editors new editors with Misplaced Pages-related things! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 21:47, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks DaXServer, I have tried adding more references. These talk about the activities the NGO has undertaken and not about the NGO per se, a couple of these independent publications do cover the range of activities that were carried out under the aegis of FFOP. Shouldn't work be more important than the organization itself, especially when it is talked about by independent publications? Please see if you can review and I will visit the teahouse, thanks again. Iam1947 (talk) 06:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Iam1947 The references talk about the activities that the members of the NGO held. They don't say it's directly on behalf of the NGO. They would count as sources for that person, but not for the NGO. I see that you've resubmitted, so let's see how other reviewer evaluates — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- I see you have a point, but the reports do say the NGO organised the training and dialogue. Great to have feedback as a young contributor. Thanks Iam1947 (talk) 11:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Iam1947 The references talk about the activities that the members of the NGO held. They don't say it's directly on behalf of the NGO. They would count as sources for that person, but not for the NGO. I see that you've resubmitted, so let's see how other reviewer evaluates — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks DaXServer, I have tried adding more references. These talk about the activities the NGO has undertaken and not about the NGO per se, a couple of these independent publications do cover the range of activities that were carried out under the aegis of FFOP. Shouldn't work be more important than the organization itself, especially when it is talked about by independent publications? Please see if you can review and I will visit the teahouse, thanks again. Iam1947 (talk) 06:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Welcome back with a Barnstar
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I know I am 6 months late, but I've finally learnt the syntax for giving barnstars :P. Thank you for your painstaking efforts in saving Mbh related pages earlier this year from vandalism and an extensive cleanup. I know it was a hellish job but you still nailed it. Panchalidraupadi (talk) 19:59, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks you @Panchalidraupadi I hope my efforts were fruitful. However, I think those vandals are still on WP lying around and possibly screwing up some other topic. Only time will tell. We will be vigilant in the topics that we know about. Happy editing and see you around :) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 21:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DaxServer:You have been fruitful, but you're right about the vandals. Already found one, who is editing profusely in non-epic topics everyday, while making subtle inversion of content in select Mbh pages in favour of his hero. Will keep you posted. See you around too. :) Panchalidraupadi (talk) 10:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks @Panchalidraupadi.
- Also, could you give me some recommendations for Mahabharata books that we could use for citations? There seems to be a lot of books but I'm not sure where to start. Thanks in advance 🙏 — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DaxServer:You have been fruitful, but you're right about the vandals. Already found one, who is editing profusely in non-epic topics everyday, while making subtle inversion of content in select Mbh pages in favour of his hero. Will keep you posted. See you around too. :) Panchalidraupadi (talk) 10:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DaxServer: For primary sources, we have K.M. Ganguli's translation of the non-critical Sanskrit text available online on sacred-text website, and the Critical Edition (translated in English by Bibek Debroy) which is not in public domain as of now. For secondary scholarly sources, there are tons, so it is difficult to pinpoint some. For Arjun and Karna, you can refer to "Arjun: the Double Hero" and "Karna: The Sanskrit Hero" both by Kevin Mcgrath. For Draupadi, Alf Hiltebeitel and Dr. Pradip Bhattacharya have done extensive research. For overall Mahabharata textual criticism, books by Vishnu Sukthankar such as "Prolegomena to the Adi Parva" and "On the Meaning of Mahabharata" will help. There are a gazillion papers, journals, books, etc which you can find online, but sometimes it is hard to extract the strictly scholarly ones. Let me know if you need help with any references or facts. - Panchalidraupadi (talk) 19:56, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Draft:Budugu film
My drafts are getting rejected left and right such as Draft:Mahankali (film). Since this article has no The Times of India review and no The Hindu review, I suggest not making it into an article. DareshMohan (talk) 17:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DareshMohan Would you be able to add more reception reviews to the Draft:Mahankali (film) if possible? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 21:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Review
Draft:List of Indian Soups and Stews Can you please review my draft? Also you did edit the suryastra page. So why isn't it reviewed yet? Lord kai07 (talk) 11:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Adding promotional material
Some body kindly educate Mr. User talk:Jayanthkumar123 to stop promoting and advertising Telugu cinema whereever possible, out of context in the lead section of this article, adding factually inaccurate using predatory references. Fostera12 (talk) 12:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)