| Revision as of 21:56, 21 September 2022 view sourceArbClerkBot (talk | contribs)Bots1,372 edits →Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather: Crossposting from Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard (bot)← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:05, 21 September 2022 view source Barkeep49 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, New page reviewers, Oversighters, Administrators40,934 edits →Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather: if there are questionsNext edit → | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 21:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC) | For the Arbitration Committee, ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 21:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
| : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather}}'''<!-- ] (]) 21:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> | : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather}}'''<!-- ] (]) 21:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> | ||
| Welcome back. I want to reiterate something I said to you via email, which is that if you have questions about what your restrictions mean to please ask and get clarification from Arbs. ] is probably the best place; it's likely only 1 or 2 will give opinions unless there's some kind of disagreement. The restrictions aren't meant to be gotchas so you understanding what's expected is important as a matter of fairness and giving you a chance to be a successful editor. ] (]) 22:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:05, 21 September 2022
Talk:U.S.-centric hypotheses about Nazi gun regulation listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect U.S.-centric hypotheses about Nazi gun regulation. Since you had some involvement with the Talk:U.S.-centric hypotheses about Nazi gun regulation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —GodsyCONT) 09:33, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gun show loophole
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gun show loophole you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gun show loophole
The article Gun show loophole you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gun show loophole for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gun show loophole
The article Gun show loophole you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Gun show loophole for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 00:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration CA notice
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Lightbreather and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, Given the strong community sentiment that an exception be made to Eric Corebtt's topic ban to allow him to respond on-wiki to off-wiki criticism, I have proposed that a parallel exception be granted to allow you to respond to on-wiki criticisms and attacks. I believe that the disparate treatment of you in contrast to Corbett and a certain other user who I apparently may not name is at least arguably discriminatory. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- The amendment request has been archived at Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather#Amendment request: Lightbreather (October 2015). For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 15:08, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
You're missed
I don't know exactly why you were banned, but you are missed here. You did more to improve articles on the gun debate in the U.S. than any other editor. Felsic2 (talk) 17:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Assault weapons legislation listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Assault weapons legislation. Since you had some involvement with the Assault weapons legislation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 14:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Private sale loophole listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Private sale loophole. Since you had some involvement with the Private sale loophole redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Hairy Dude (talk) 15:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Everytown final logo.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Everytown final logo.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 10:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Laura Fjeld for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Fjeld is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Laura Fjeld until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 04:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Amendment notice (required notice)
Please see ] Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- A motion which may relate to you has been proposed by an arbitrator at WP:ARCA. Please see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Lightbreather:_Motion. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 05:11, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The interaction ban between Hell in a Bucket (talk · contribs) and Lightbreather (talk · contribs) taken over in the Lightbreather case is rescinded.
For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather
Category:American gun rights advocates has been nominated for discussion
Category:American gun rights advocates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:KAFFEEKLATSCH" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Misplaced Pages:KAFFEEKLATSCH. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 27#Misplaced Pages:KAFFEEKLATSCH until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — J947 ‡ 04:19, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Lightbreather unban appeal
The Arbitration Committee is considering an unban appeal from Lightbreather (talk · contribs). Interested editors may give feedback to the committee at here. For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Lightbreather unban appeal
Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedy 1 of the Lightbreather case is suspended for a probationary period lasting twelve months from the date this motion is enacted. During this period, any uninvolved administrator may block Lightbreather (talk · contribs) for any of the behaviors identified in the Findings of Fact or for failure to adhere to any normal editorial process or expectations as an Arbitration Enforcement action for up to 1 year. Any block 3 months or longer should be reported to the Arbitration Committee for automatic review. The committee will consider presented evidence and statements before deciding by motion what, if any, actions are necessary, up to and including reinstating a site ban. In the event that no administrator imposes such a block, the remedy will automatically lapse after twelve months. Restrictions detailed in remedies 2-6 remain in place until actively appealed.
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 21:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather
Welcome back. I want to reiterate something I said to you via email, which is that if you have questions about what your restrictions mean to please ask and get clarification from Arbs. WP:ARCA is probably the best place; it's likely only 1 or 2 will give opinions unless there's some kind of disagreement. The restrictions aren't meant to be gotchas so you understanding what's expected is important as a matter of fairness and giving you a chance to be a successful editor. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)