| Revision as of 22:52, 21 September 2022 view sourceDreamy Jazz (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators105,825 edits →Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather 2: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:05, 21 September 2022 view source Lightbreather (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,672 edits Archive pre-2022 postsNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Retired|RETIRED DUE TO SEXUAL HARASSMENT|date=July 1, 2015|reason=}} | |||
| {{Archives|search=yes|collapsed=yes}} | |||
| {{nobots}} | |||
| == Talk:U.S.-centric hypotheses about Nazi gun regulation listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Talk:U.S.-centric hypotheses about Nazi gun regulation'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <small>—]</small><sup>(]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">])</sub> 09:33, 10 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 08:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 09:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can ] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 00:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Arbitration CA notice== | |||
| You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the ] may be of use. | |||
| Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbitration CA notice --> Given the strong community sentiment that an exception be made to Eric Corebtt's topic ban to allow him to respond on-wiki to off-wiki criticism, I have proposed that a parallel exception be granted to allow you to respond to on-wiki criticisms and attacks. I believe that the disparate treatment of you in contrast to Corbett and a certain other user who I apparently may not name is at least arguably discriminatory. ] (]) 15:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :The amendment request has been archived at ]. For the Arbitration Committee, ]] 15:08, 7 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == You're missed == | |||
| I don't know exactly why you were banned, but you are missed here. You did more to improve articles on the gun debate in the U.S. than any other editor. ] (]) 17:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Assault weapons legislation listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Assault weapons legislation'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 14:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Private sale loophole listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Private sale loophole'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 15:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Everytown final logo.png listed for discussion == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> <span style="background-color: purple">] ]</span> 10:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 04:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Amendment notice (required notice) == | |||
| Please see ] ] (]) 17:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :A motion which may relate to you has been proposed by an arbitrator at ]. Please see ]. Best, ''']''' (<small>aka</small> ] '''·'''  ] '''·'''  ]) 05:11, 8 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration motion regarding ''Lightbreather'' == | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has resolved by ] that: | |||
| {{ivmbox|1= The interaction ban between {{user|Hell in a Bucket}} and {{user|Lightbreather}} taken over in ] is rescinded.}} | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ''']''' (<small>aka</small> ] '''·'''  ] '''·'''  ]) 20:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| : Discuss this at: ''']''' | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. – ] (]) 18:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == "Misplaced Pages:KAFFEEKLATSCH" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <small>—</small> ] ‡ ''<sup>] ⁓ ]</sup>'' 04:19, 27 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Lightbreather unban appeal == | == Lightbreather unban appeal == | ||
Revision as of 23:05, 21 September 2022
Lightbreather unban appeal
The Arbitration Committee is considering an unban appeal from Lightbreather (talk · contribs). Interested editors may give feedback to the committee at here. For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Lightbreather unban appeal
Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedy 1 of the Lightbreather case is suspended for a probationary period lasting twelve months from the date this motion is enacted. During this period, any uninvolved administrator may block Lightbreather (talk · contribs) for any of the behaviors identified in the Findings of Fact or for failure to adhere to any normal editorial process or expectations as an Arbitration Enforcement action for up to 1 year. Any block 3 months or longer should be reported to the Arbitration Committee for automatic review. The committee will consider presented evidence and statements before deciding by motion what, if any, actions are necessary, up to and including reinstating a site ban. In the event that no administrator imposes such a block, the remedy will automatically lapse after twelve months. Restrictions detailed in remedies 2-6 remain in place until actively appealed.
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 21:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather
Welcome back. I want to reiterate something I said to you via email, which is that if you have questions about what your restrictions mean to please ask and get clarification from Arbs. WP:ARCA is probably the best place; it's likely only 1 or 2 will give opinions unless there's some kind of disagreement. The restrictions aren't meant to be gotchas so you understanding what's expected is important as a matter of fairness and giving you a chance to be a successful editor. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I need to think about that. In the meantime, I was going to archive older posts on this page, but when I go to edit it the first line is an arbitration decision banner. I don't want to touch that. Can you remove it, please? Lightbreather (talk) 22:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Forgot to remove that bit. Has been removed. Thanks, Dreamy Jazz 22:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)