Revision as of 17:49, 30 May 2022 editJusdafax (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers101,897 edits Add WikiProject Environment template← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:41, 1 October 2022 edit undoKlbrain (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers87,320 edits →Merger proposal: OpposeNext edit → | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
This merge seems reasonable to me. ] (]) 01:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC) | This merge seems reasonable to me. ] (]) 01:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
:I'd agree, except that ], at 137k, is ] and so having a separate article is warranted. ] (]) 16:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Title change proposal == | == Title change proposal == |
Revision as of 16:41, 1 October 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Passive smoking article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 35 days |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Passive smoking. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Passive smoking at the Reference desk. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2018 and 5 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Atomic1City*Blonde.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 30 July 2021
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the intro of the section 'effects' please add that "There is no risk-free level of secondhand smoke exposure. Even brief exposure can be harmful to health." This is supported by citation no. 133 from the CDC fact sheet Also additional sources are from:
1) US surgeon general: 2) The EPA: 3) American Lung Association: 4) American cancer society: 5) Australian government Department of health: 6) National Cancer Institute:
Also in the same section's sub-section 'Cancer: General' , please add "Secondhand smoke contains more than 7,000 chemicals, of which hundreds are toxic and about 70 can cause cancer." source: citation no.133 from CDC: and from the American cancer society:
Thank you! 2409:4042:2E1F:FE5B:9571:54ED:1ED0:DDFD (talk) 18:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Second part is done. I don't know if we really need the first sentence; it's not like the article implies otherwise. Leaving request open for another opinion. ◢ Ganbaruby! (talk) 20:47, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- I find the first sentence about no risk-free level to be helpful information for readers. It looks supported by the sources. I'd probably support adding it. ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 03:29, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- I can see benefits from both. On one hand the article's 3rd sentence screams that it's dangerous and so adding it may be superfluous. On the other, it can be imperative to clarify that the health detriment of the smoke isn't either "nothing" or "horrible disease". I would lean more so on adding it. If we can reasonably get away with further hammering home that smoking is bad, I think we should take it, and the requested addition is extremely inobtrusive from my point of view. Sirdog9002 (talk) 23:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: I'm closing this request while it's under discussion per
Remember to change the answered no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category.
ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Scene in Runaway Jury
Scene: Lonnie Shaver's fellow jurors request him not to secondhand smoke. Please create "Pop culture" section and mention this. Rizosome (talk) 05:48, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Not done. WP:FANCRUFT, not important to the subject. ◢ Ganbaruby! (talk) 20:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Merger proposal
I propose to merge Sidestream smoke into this article because everything that needs to be covered about sidestream smoke is also covered in this article. Needforspeed888 (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
This merge seems reasonable to me. AdequateNBAfan (talk) 01:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'd agree, except that Passive smoking, at 137k, is WP:TOOBIG and so having a separate article is warranted. Klbrain (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Title change proposal
With an increase in literature on third-hand smoke, the dichotomy between active and passive smoking seems less relevant. As such, I'd propose changing the beginning term to secondhand or second-hand smoke, which would move to passive smoking to one of the alternate terms. AdequateNBAfan (talk) 01:51, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- B-Class medicine articles
- High-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- B-Class Health and fitness articles
- High-importance Health and fitness articles
- WikiProject Health and fitness articles
- B-Class Occupational Safety and Health articles
- Mid-importance Occupational Safety and Health articles
- WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health articles
- B-Class Environment articles
- Mid-importance Environment articles