| Revision as of 16:02, 29 April 2022 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,141,424 edits →User script to detect unreliable sources: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:08, 23 October 2022 edit undoTonyTheTiger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers401,274 editsNo edit summaryTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| <span style="font-size:90%">This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.</span> Delivered by: ] (]) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC) | <span style="font-size:90%">This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.</span> Delivered by: ] (]) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Headbomb/sandbox3&oldid=1085285969 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Headbomb/sandbox3&oldid=1085285969 --> | ||
| == Nomination for merger of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] <small>(] / ] / ] / ] / ])</small> 01:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:08, 23 October 2022
Shortcuts| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Shakespeare and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
Florian theory of Shakespeare authorship
More eyes would be good. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Florian_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship#Should_we_merge_Crollalanza_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship_article_into_this_one?
For the interested. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
New article
For the interested: Shakespeare coat of arms. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Standards for Play Articles (specifically, plot summary section)
Hey everyone, I was hoping to stimulate some discussion regarding the current guidelines for articles about Shakespeare plays. Specifically, I notice that the guideline for "plot" indicates that no Act breaks should be used in this section of the article. However, I was looking at examples of FA Shakespeare plays and for example, Hamlet's plot summary does use Act breaks. Should the guideline be changed, or Hamlet edited?
Patr2016 (talk) 01:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
More input appreciated
Talk:List_of_Shakespeare_authorship_candidates#Recent_WP:SPS_additions. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources
Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliableI have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Misplaced Pages. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:Romeo and Juliet
Template:Romeo and Juliet has been nominated for merging with Template:Romeo and Juliet film adaptations. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC)