| Revision as of 22:56, 21 July 2012 editElektrik Shoos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,663 edits IPsock tags typically go on the user page; moving← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:16, 28 October 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tags: AWB Replaced | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| {{Shared IP|Bezeq International (Israel)}} | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from ]. When removing content, please specify a reason in the ] and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] (]) 19:10, 6 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| ] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button ] or ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 19:58, 6 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==References== | |||
| Please use high quality references per ] such as ] or major textbooks. Note that ] are NOT the same as ] articles. Thanks and welcome to Misplaced Pages.{{-}}] (] · ] · ]) 15:14, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I don't see where in ] it say that one can't use primary sources. | |||
| Which source do you think is not a quality source? | |||
| Would you mind talking at the article talk page before you just delete everything on your own opinion?] (]) 16:40, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Also would be nice if you would add {{fact}} {{MEDCN}} {{MEDRS}} to notify people to search refs, instead of just deleting whatever you don't like. | |||
| see http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:MEDRS bottom of the page for how to do that. ] (]) 16:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| There is also a symbol for {{Primary source-inline}} ] (]) 16:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::We do not use primary sources typically and money of the sources you are using do not even mention CT scans. Thus I will remove this text again until these issues are dealt with.--] (] · ] · ]) 19:44, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Dear mr jmh649 , I don't know which refs you reffer to because you still prefer to delete entire sections insted of marking then facts needing better refs to your opinion, but please recall that ct use ionizing radiation, and thus effecfs of radiation would apply, whether ct is mentioned or not. Similarly, also note that CT sometime use contrast agent, etc. ] (]) 21:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :All facts need references. ] (] · ] · ]) 23:37, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hello ... I also wanted to '''welcome you to Misplaced Pages''', and to let you know '''I hope you stay here and keep contributing''' to this very worthy and world-changing project! :-) | |||
| ::With that said - and asking your forgiveness if I am out of line - I wanted to just respectfully suggest that you give Doc James "the benefit of the doubt" in this situation. I am absolutely certain he means to show you ZERO disrespect. No doubt he is personally HAPPY that you are freely giving your valuable time to try to help improve medical articles here, and to contribute to the project in other ways. There is '''NO QUESTION''' that the '''ONLY''' things Doc James cares about here are: (1) that Misplaced Pages has the highest possible quality articles and references, and (2) that you enjoy yourself as an editor and keep on helping. WORK WITH HIM :-) | |||
| ::I also personally thank you for your assistance, and invite you to let me know if I can help you in any way. | |||
| ::With very best regards: | |||
| ] (]) 11:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::WOW - my sincere apologies to all, I didn't realize until just now that you had taken this unfortunate misunderstanding to the next level at the Noticeboard. Given the existence of that action, and until I read through the arguments in the matter, let me just respectfully withdraw my previous comments that were favorable to Doc James (while letting my welcome and thanks to you stand as issued) and for now merely encourage '''everyone''' to assume good faith, keep cool heads, and focus on productivity instead of punches :-) | |||
| ::::After consideration of everything here, I feel that it would not be right for me to comment IN ANY WAY on this issue because (1) Doc James gave me a Barnstar this morning, and (2) for me to now take a position FULLY supporting him on this matter could potentially appear to be sort of a ''quid pro quo''. Good luck to you, my apologies for any misunderstanding. | |||
| ::::] (]) 12:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Best regards: | |||
| ::::] (]) 12:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Edit warring== | |||
| You will be blocked if you continue to edit war poor quality content into this article. The refs you are using do not support the content in question. ] (] · ] · ]) 20:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| In my view, you mr jmh649 delete without providing sufficient explanations. Without marking facts requiring refs, and without providing sufficient time for other editors to respond to the (not given) marks. | |||
| Do you think that your opinion mater more than others, and that you need not explain it to any one because you are always correct? Do you think that it is not possible that any one would know better than you? | |||
| About your threat to ban, please provide me with more information with regard to such process, so that I would be able to contemplate which one of us would be banned, in case that such a process would occur. Regard.] (]) 21:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :If content is not properly referenced it can simply be removed. There is no requirement to tag it for a period of time before removing it. And high quality references must always be used for controversial content.--] (] · ] · ]) 23:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:16, 28 October 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.