| Revision as of 08:45, 29 October 2022 editGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers381,860 edits →Ping: fix link← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:46, 29 October 2022 edit undoNemov (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,222 edits →Ping: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| I'm watching the Olivier RfC with interest, and found your comments sensible. About the ping: You pinged Ceoil twice, and don't have to ping Cassianto and SchroCat who claim they left Misplaced Pages but both commented under IP names. I wish they'd return and sign with recognizable names. - I took part in the 2015 discussion which you may want to consult as well, if only for background. I was taken to ], because of me questioning if really the editors who improve an article to FA status can remove a feature that has served readers for many years. -- ] (]) 08:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC) | I'm watching the Olivier RfC with interest, and found your comments sensible. About the ping: You pinged Ceoil twice, and don't have to ping Cassianto and SchroCat who claim they left Misplaced Pages but both commented under IP names. I wish they'd return and sign with recognizable names. - I took part in the 2015 discussion which you may want to consult as well, if only for background. I was taken to ], because of me questioning if really the editors who improve an article to FA status can remove a feature that has served readers for many years. -- ] (]) 08:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :I just went back to 2017. The whole thing is pretty silly. To me it's a handful of editors watching the article who have been blocking the change for years. Basically their argument is they don't like it, there's no rule that it's mandatory, and it's a settled issue that should never be questioned. Some of the editors conduct towards other editors for bringing it up is appalling. I don't get it. ] (]) 13:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:46, 29 October 2022
Ping
I'm watching the Olivier RfC with interest, and found your comments sensible. About the ping: You pinged Ceoil twice, and don't have to ping Cassianto and SchroCat who claim they left Misplaced Pages but both commented under IP names. I wish they'd return and sign with recognizable names. - I took part in the 2015 discussion which you may want to consult as well, if only for background. I was taken to arbitration enforcement then, because of me questioning if really the editors who improve an article to FA status can remove a feature that has served readers for many years. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- I just went back to 2017. The whole thing is pretty silly. To me it's a handful of editors watching the article who have been blocking the change for years. Basically their argument is they don't like it, there's no rule that it's mandatory, and it's a settled issue that should never be questioned. Some of the editors conduct towards other editors for bringing it up is appalling. I don't get it. Nemov (talk) 13:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)