| Revision as of 21:05, 29 October 2022 editC.Fred (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators278,027 edits →Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion: level 3-equivalent warning: no personal attacksTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:14, 29 October 2022 edit undoYamla (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators148,019 edits DeclineNext edit → | ||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
| --> from certain ] ((Article)) for a period of '''24 hours''' for ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. —''']''' (]) 20:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewpblock --> | --> from certain ] ((Article)) for a period of '''24 hours''' for ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. —''']''' (]) 20:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewpblock --> | ||
| {{unblock reviewed |1=I should be unblocked because I was correct, or the other two users should also be blocked for also engaging in edit warring. |decline = Being correct does not allow you to engage in edit warring. Everyone involved in edit warring believes they are correct. What's happened to other users is not relevant to your request. ] (]) 21:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Personal attacks == | == Personal attacks == | ||
Revision as of 21:14, 29 October 2022
 Welcome!Last edited:Last edited by:21:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC) Yamla (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account! Your host, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.
 Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
Welcome!
|
October 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Flint River Academy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jacona (talk) 19:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- It takes two to edit war, if you would quit reverting my edits I wouldn't have to keep unreverting them. Whether the demographics are accurate is irrelevant, demographics don't go in the main body of the description and have always had their own sub-section in any article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.112.217.211 (talk) 18:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
You are missing the point here. Per WP:BRD, you made a:
- Bold edit. It was
- Reverted. If you disagree, you then
- Discuss the matter on the article talk page.
Anyone can just continually hit "undo", becuase they think they're right. That is why we have talk pages, and policies against such behaviour, otherwise it becomes disrupritive. As for the RSA syndrome page, the entry you keep removing is supported by sourcing and consensus. Your edit has neither. It has also been discussed before, but feel free to bring it up again. But first, you really should self-revert. Thanks - wolf 20:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Edit war notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 20:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Flint River Academy, you may be blocked from editing. — Moops 20:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Edit warring
You are now involved in edit wars on two differenrt articles. Is there some reason why you refuse to simply go to the talk pages and discuss, as is required by our policies? Simply hitting 'undo' repeatedly is not the way to go about making any changes you seek. (courtesy ping: Jacona) - wolf 20:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - wolf 20:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Edit warring takes two people 97.112.217.211 (talk) 20:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- You've been reverted by two different people today at Flint River Academy. —C.Fred (talk) 20:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- And? I've explained to both of them that accuracy of the demographics is irrelevant. In literally any article that cites demographics of a town, institute, whatever, the demographics have their own section.
- I'd be willing to bet that if I went to one of those pages and added demographics to the main description *that* edit would be reverted too... 97.112.217.211 (talk) 20:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- You have not engaged on the talk page. You need to do that and work toward consensus. —C.Fred (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- They didn't either. They just kept reverting my edits 97.112.217.211 (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- This is a great example as to why Wiki is not considered a valid academic source. You have a bunch of (Personal attack removed) freaking out and reverting edits just to try to get the last word, regardless of whether they're correct. 97.112.217.211 (talk) 20:56, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages is a collaborative project. You must be willing to work with other editors to edit here. If your edits continue to contain personal attacks against other editors, you will be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 21:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- You have not engaged on the talk page. You need to do that and work toward consensus. —C.Fred (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- You've been reverted by two different people today at Flint River Academy. —C.Fred (talk) 20:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 20:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
97.112.217.211 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I should be unblocked because I was correct, or the other two users should also be blocked for also engaging in edit warring.
Decline reason:
Being correct does not allow you to engage in edit warring. Everyone involved in edit warring believes they are correct. What's happened to other users is not relevant to your request. Yamla (talk) 21:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Personal attacks
Also, please don't post personal attacks, such as this edit summary, focus on edits, not editors. Thank you - wolf 20:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Again, please stop with the personal attacks. This latest one is particularly offensive and has been removed. Pinging C.Fred, as additional sanctions should be considered. - wolf 20:55, 29 October 2022 (UTC)