Revision as of 00:06, 13 December 2022 edit67.253.172.222 (talk) →Thinking of moving there: new sectionTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:10, 13 December 2022 edit undoNatureBoyMD (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers68,742 edits Undid revision 1127115485 by 67.253.172.222 (talk) not related to article improvement (and Tennessee is full)Tag: UndoNext edit → | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== Requested move at ] == | == Requested move at ] == | ||
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 09:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC) | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 09:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
== Thinking of moving there == | |||
How is it there ] (]) 00:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:10, 13 December 2022
Tennessee Project‑class | |||||||
|
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Shortcut
Tennessee Women in Red
Might I draw your attention to a new redlist of notable Tennessee women who lack a wikipedia biography, in the form of Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by dictionary/Tennessee Encyclopedia - drawn from the "The Tennessee Encyclopedia of History and Culture". Nashville, Tennessee: Tennessee Historical Society.
Right now, there are more than five times as many biographies of men as there are of women on wikipedia - see the Wikidata Human Gender Indicators page. I hope this project will lend its support to addressing this imbalance by creating biographies for women within your project's scope, and perhaps by adopting the Encyclopedia of Tennessee Encyclopedia of History and Culture redlist. More generally, WikiProject Women in Red has more than 300 redlists covering perhaps 100,000 notable women for whom we have no biography. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tagishsimon (talk • contribs) 18:55, March 9, 2017 (UTC)
FAR of Battle of Shiloh
I have nominated Battle of Shiloh for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.
Requested move at Talk:Bat Creek inscription#Requested move 21 August 2022
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Bat Creek inscription#Requested move 21 August 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 09:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Categories: