| Revision as of 23:20, 10 December 2022 editGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers383,166 edits →Check user?: ice breakingTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:36, 15 December 2022 edit undo2a02:c7c:a400:ef00:3de9:3f2:337:22bd (talk) →Take note: new sectionTags: Reverted New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| :::::I agree there isn't a war. I know it was heated in the past, but aside from a few editors with strong opinions progress is being made via RfCs. Maybe a few of the entrenched debaters will see thing writing on the wall. ] (]) 23:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC) | :::::I agree there isn't a war. I know it was heated in the past, but aside from a few editors with strong opinions progress is being made via RfCs. Maybe a few of the entrenched debaters will see thing writing on the wall. ] (]) 23:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :::::: Did you see ], where I asked how many more RfCs we'll need (which was almost exactly a year ago). Sorry if repetition, - my memory ... and then past midnight ;) - It was with ] that I illustrated hopes. --] (]) 23:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC) | :::::: Did you see ], where I asked how many more RfCs we'll need (which was almost exactly a year ago). Sorry if repetition, - my memory ... and then past midnight ;) - It was with ] that I illustrated hopes. --] (]) 23:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
| == Take note == | |||
| I'm not going diff hunting, apologise: {{green|"Ah, the "temperament of an artist defense" for an editor with multiple blocks for bad behavior and continued hostility to others. Some of these arguments read like WP:FANCLUB. No wonder SchroCat has gotten away with this behavior for so long. Nemov (talk) 02:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)"}} - or, they may just be a group of well-intentioned, civil people who hold a different opinion to you. And if nice, civil comments from nice, civil editors reads like a WP:FANCLUB to you, what might the club be called that contains a group of people who appear to be bullying a hugely productive editor whose only desire is to improve the project? ] (]) 17:36, 15 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:36, 15 December 2022
Check user?
A part of me still thinks that the IP(s) might be someone pretending to be SchroCat. But, if it really is him? then, he's lost my support. GoodDay (talk) 22:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Based on the content he was discussing I have no reason to believe it's a different user. He's been super active on a few articles under discussion and it's been super confusing for users coming in who don't know who it is and then add the hostility angle and it's a huge headache. Nemov (talk) 22:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I remember Stanley Kubrick in 2015, when I was taken to AE (arbitration enforcement) because I dared to ask the question if the principal editors should decide about infobox or not. I was told not to do it again. The whole discussion is worth reading, but for users with little time, the summary of the close should do. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- All that stuff is over my head. This really isn't a content dispute situation it's an editor conduct problem. Nemov (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I asked the future arbitrators, and they saw (almost) nothing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:05, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I agree there isn't a war. I know it was heated in the past, but aside from a few editors with strong opinions progress is being made via RfCs. Maybe a few of the entrenched debaters will see thing writing on the wall. Nemov (talk) 23:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Did you see the Sibelius discussion, where I asked how many more RfCs we'll need (which was almost exactly a year ago). Sorry if repetition, - my memory ... and then past midnight ;) - It was with a Sibelius composition that I illustrated hopes. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I agree there isn't a war. I know it was heated in the past, but aside from a few editors with strong opinions progress is being made via RfCs. Maybe a few of the entrenched debaters will see thing writing on the wall. Nemov (talk) 23:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I asked the future arbitrators, and they saw (almost) nothing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:05, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- All that stuff is over my head. This really isn't a content dispute situation it's an editor conduct problem. Nemov (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I remember Stanley Kubrick in 2015, when I was taken to AE (arbitration enforcement) because I dared to ask the question if the principal editors should decide about infobox or not. I was told not to do it again. The whole discussion is worth reading, but for users with little time, the summary of the close should do. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Take note
I'm not going diff hunting, apologise: "Ah, the "temperament of an artist defense" for an editor with multiple blocks for bad behavior and continued hostility to others. Some of these arguments read like WP:FANCLUB. No wonder SchroCat has gotten away with this behavior for so long. Nemov (talk) 02:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)" - or, they may just be a group of well-intentioned, civil people who hold a different opinion to you. And if nice, civil comments from nice, civil editors reads like a WP:FANCLUB to you, what might the club be called that contains a group of people who appear to be bullying a hugely productive editor whose only desire is to improve the project? 2A02:C7C:A400:EF00:3DE9:3F2:337:22BD (talk) 17:36, 15 December 2022 (UTC)