| Revision as of 23:16, 20 December 2022 editMONGO (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,644 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:17, 20 December 2022 edit undoMONGO (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,644 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| <!-- Please add all peer review discussions below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 or 3 headers (==...== and ===...===) below to break up the review. Use level 4 (====...====) and so on.--> | <!-- Please add all peer review discussions below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 or 3 headers (==...== and ===...===) below to break up the review. Use level 4 (====...====) and so on.--> | ||
| {{Peer review page|topic=natsci}} | {{Peer review page|topic=natsci}} | ||
| I've listed this article for peer review because it is a former Featured Article and was recently delisted. I was not able to understand what the main concerns were so am asking for outside review to determine exactly what this article needs to regain FA status. In 2022, more than 200 edits went into this article to make |
I've listed this article for peer review because it is a former Featured Article and was recently delisted. I was not able to understand what the main concerns were so am asking for outside review to determine exactly what this article needs to regain FA status. In 2022, more than 200 edits went into this article to make updates to the references, yet the FAR folks felt that the references were still inadequate/inaccurate or, well, I really dont know. | ||
| Thanks, ] (]) 23:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC) | Thanks, ] (]) 23:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:17, 20 December 2022
Yellowstone fires of 1988
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review
- Previous peer review
I've listed this article for peer review because it is a former Featured Article and was recently delisted. I was not able to understand what the main concerns were so am asking for outside review to determine exactly what this article needs to regain FA status. In 2022, more than 200 edits went into this article to make updates to the references, yet the FAR folks felt that the references were still inadequate/inaccurate or, well, I really dont know.
Thanks, MONGO (talk) 23:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Categories: