Revision as of 12:34, 29 December 2022 editKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 edits →External links← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:24, 29 December 2022 edit undoKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 editsm Arranged references with script | wp:datescript-assisted date/terms audit; see wp:unlinkdates, wp:overlinkNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Intergovernmental organization}} | {{short description|Intergovernmental organization}} | ||
{{Use |
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2022}} | ||
{{Infobox Geopolitical organization | {{Infobox Geopolitical organization | ||
|conventional_long_name = International Tribunal<br />for the Law of the Sea | |conventional_long_name = International Tribunal<br />for the Law of the Sea | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
|leader_name2 = {{flagicon|Iceland}} Judge Tomas Heidar | |leader_name2 = {{flagicon|Iceland}} Judge Tomas Heidar | ||
|established_event1 = {{nowrap|] adopted}} | |established_event1 = {{nowrap|] adopted}} | ||
|established_date1 = |
|established_date1 = December 10, 1982 | ||
|established_event2 = UNCLOS in force | |established_event2 = UNCLOS in force | ||
|established_date2 = |
|established_date2 = November 16, 1994 | ||
|official_website = | |official_website = | ||
}} | }} | ||
], close to the River ]]] | ], close to the River ]]] | ||
The '''International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea''' ('''ITLOS''') is an ] created by the mandate of the ]. It was established by the ], signed at ], on |
The '''International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea''' ('''ITLOS''') is an ] created by the mandate of the ]. It was established by the ], signed at ], on December 10, 1982. The Convention entered into force on November 16, 1994, and established an international framework for law over all ocean space, its uses and resources. The ITLOS is one of four ] listed in Article 287 of the UNCLOS.<ref name="best" /> | ||
The Tribunal is based in ], Germany. The Convention also established the ], with responsibility for the regulation of ] beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, that is beyond the limits of the territorial sea, the contiguous zone and the continental shelf. There are currently 168 signatories, 167 states plus the ]. As of 2021, holdouts included the ]<ref name=hf |
The Tribunal is based in ], Germany. The Convention also established the ], with responsibility for the regulation of ] beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, that is beyond the limits of the territorial sea, the contiguous zone and the continental shelf. There are currently 168 signatories, 167 states plus the ]. As of 2021, holdouts included the ]<ref name="hf" /> and the ].<ref name="tw" /> | ||
==Composition== | ==Composition== | ||
According to its founding statute, the Tribunal has a set of 21 judges who serve from a variety of states parties, "according to a method that intends to assure an ] geographical representation".<ref name=gr |
According to its founding statute, the Tribunal has a set of 21 judges who serve from a variety of states parties, "according to a method that intends to assure an ] geographical representation".<ref name="gr" /> | ||
At the request of ] and the European Union, the Tribunal set up a special chamber composed of 5 judges to deal with the ''Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Community)''. | At the request of ] and the European Union, the Tribunal set up a special chamber composed of 5 judges to deal with the ''Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Community)''. | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
By agreement of the parties ] and ], the Tribunal formed a special chamber composed of 5 judges to deal with the ''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire)''. | By agreement of the parties ] and ], the Tribunal formed a special chamber composed of 5 judges to deal with the ''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire)''. | ||
By agreement of the parties ] and ], the Tribunal formed a special chamber of 7 permanent judges and 2 ''ad hoc'' judges to deal with the ''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives)''.<ref |
By agreement of the parties ] and ], the Tribunal formed a special chamber of 7 permanent judges and 2 ''ad hoc'' judges to deal with the ''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives)''.<ref name="pr" /> | ||
== Seats == | == Seats == | ||
Disputes referred to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea or one of its chambers can be heard in Germany<ref name="itlos" /> or in Singapore.<ref name="singapore" /><ref name="disputes" /> | |||
Disputes referred to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea or one of its chambers can be heard in Germany<ref>{{Cite web|title=International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Seat|url=https://www.itlos.org/en/main/general-information/seat-of-the-tribunal/|access-date=2022-02-02|website=www.itlos.org}}</ref> or in Singapore.<ref>{{Cite web|last=ITLOS|title=ITLOS AND SINGAPORE SIGN MODEL AGREEMENT TO ENABLE THE TRIBUNAL TO SIT IN SINGAPORE|url=https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_303_E.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Auto|first=Hermes|date=2020-06-11|title=Law of the sea disputes can now be heard in Singapore under signed agreement {{!}} The Straits Times|url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/law-of-the-sea-disputes-can-now-be-heard-in-singapore-under-signed-agreement|access-date=2022-02-02|website=www.straitstimes.com|language=en}}</ref> | |||
==Current judges== | ==Current judges== | ||
Line 212: | Line 212: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|November 13, 1997}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 4, 1997}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|January 13, 1998}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|July 1, 1999}} | ||
| Judgment on merits | | Judgment on merits | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 228: | Line 228: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|New Zealand}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|New Zealand}} | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | | rowspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | ||
| rowspan="2" | {{Dts| |
| rowspan="2" | {{Dts|link=off|July 30, 1999}} | ||
| rowspan="2" | {{Dts| |
| rowspan="2" | {{Dts|link=off|August 27, 1999}} | ||
| rowspan="2" | Order on provisional measures | | rowspan="2" | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 239: | Line 239: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|January 17, 2000}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|February 7, 2000}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 247: | Line 247: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Seychelles}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Seychelles}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|November 27, 2000}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 18, 2000}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 7 | | 7 | ||
| {{Sort|Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean|''Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean''}} | | {{Sort|Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean|''Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean''}} | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Chile}} / {{Flag|European Union}}{{Efn|group=upper-alpha|The European Union replaced and succeeded the {{Flag|European Economic Community|name=European Community}} as a party to the case on |
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Chile}} / {{Flag|European Union}}{{Efn|group=upper-alpha|The European Union replaced and succeeded the {{Flag|European Economic Community|name=European Community}} as a party to the case on December 1, 2009.}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 19, 2000}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 16, 2009}} | ||
| Terminated at request of parties | | Terminated at request of parties | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 262: | Line 262: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Belize}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Belize}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|March 21, 2001}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|April 20, 2001}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 270: | Line 270: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Yemen}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Yemen}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|July 3, 2001}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|July 13, 2001}} | ||
| Terminated at request of parties | | Terminated at request of parties | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 278: | Line 278: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Ireland}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Ireland}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|United Kingdom}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|United Kingdom}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|November 9, 2001}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 3, 2001}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 286: | Line 286: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Australia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Australia}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 2, 2002}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 23, 2002}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 294: | Line 294: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Malaysia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Malaysia}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Singapore}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Singapore}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|September 5, 2003}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|October 8, 2003}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 302: | Line 302: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea-Bissau}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea-Bissau}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|November 18, 2004}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 18, 2004}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 310: | Line 310: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|July 6, 2007}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|August 6, 2007}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 318: | Line 318: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|July 6, 2007}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|August 6, 2007}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 325: | Line 325: | ||
| {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal''}} | | {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal''}} | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Bangladesh}} / {{Flag|Myanmar}} | | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Bangladesh}} / {{Flag|Myanmar}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 14, 2009}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|March 14, 2012}} | ||
| Judgment on merits | | Judgment on merits | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 332: | Line 332: | ||
| ''Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area'' | | ''Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area'' | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | ] | | colspan="2" align="center" | ] | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|May 14, 2010}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|February 1, 2011}} | ||
| Advisory opinion | | Advisory opinion | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 340: | Line 340: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Spain}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Spain}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|November 24, 2010}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|May 28, 2013}} | ||
| Judgment on merits | | Judgment on merits | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 347: | Line 347: | ||
| {{Sort|Virginia G|''The M/V "Virginia G" Case''}} | | {{Sort|Virginia G|''The M/V "Virginia G" Case''}} | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} / {{Flag|Guinea-Bissau}} | | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} / {{Flag|Guinea-Bissau}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|July 4, 2011}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|April 14, 2014}} | ||
| Judgment on merits | | Judgment on merits | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 355: | Line 355: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Argentina}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Argentina}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Ghana}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Ghana}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|November 14, 2012}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 15, 2012}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 362: | Line 362: | ||
| ''Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC)'' | | ''Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC)'' | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission | | colspan="2" align="center" | Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|March 28, 2013}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|April 2, 2015}} | ||
| Advisory opinion | | Advisory opinion | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 370: | Line 370: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Kingdom of the Netherlands|name=Netherlands}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Kingdom of the Netherlands|name=Netherlands}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|October 21, 2013}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|November 22, 2013}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 377: | Line 377: | ||
| {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean''}} | | {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean''}} | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Ghana}} / {{Flag|Ivory Coast}} | | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Ghana}} / {{Flag|Ivory Coast}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 3, 2014}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|September 23, 2017}} | ||
| Judgment on merits | | Judgment on merits | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 385: | Line 385: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Italy}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Italy}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|India}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|India}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|July 21, 2015}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|August 24, 2015}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 393: | Line 393: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Italy}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Italy}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 17, 2015}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|April 10, 2019}} | ||
| Judgment on merits | | Judgment on merits | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 401: | Line 401: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Ukraine}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Ukraine}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|April 16, 2019}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|May 25, 2019}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 409: | Line 409: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Switzerland}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Switzerland}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Nigeria}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Nigeria}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|May 21, 2019}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|July 6, 2019}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 416: | Line 416: | ||
| {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean''}} | | {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean''}} | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Mauritius}} / {{Flag|Maldives}} | | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Mauritius}} / {{Flag|Maldives}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|September 24, 2019}} | ||
| ''Ongoing'' | | ''Ongoing'' | ||
| | | | ||
Line 423: | Line 423: | ||
| {{Sort|San Padre Pio|''The M/T "San Padre Pio" (No. 2) Case''}} | | {{Sort|San Padre Pio|''The M/T "San Padre Pio" (No. 2) Case''}} | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Switzerland}} / {{Flag|Nigeria}} | | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Switzerland}} / {{Flag|Nigeria}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 17, 2019}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 29, 2021}} | ||
| Terminated at request of parties | | Terminated at request of parties | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 431: | Line 431: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Marshall Islands}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Marshall Islands}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Equatorial Guinea}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Equatorial Guinea}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|November 10, 2022}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|November 15, 2022}} | ||
| Terminated at request of applicant | | Terminated at request of applicant | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 438: | Line 438: | ||
| ''Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law'' | | ''Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law'' | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law | | colspan="2" align="center" | Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|link=off|December 12, 2022}} | ||
| ''Ongoing'' | | ''Ongoing'' | ||
| | | | ||
Line 447: | Line 447: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|refs= | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
<ref name="best">{{cite journal |author1=SM Mitchell |author2=EJ Powell |title=Forum Shopping for the Best Adjudicator: Conflict Management and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos) |url=http://www.saramitchell.org/pmunclos.pdf |journal=APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper |publisher=American Political Science Association}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="disputes">{{Cite web|last=Auto|first=Hermes|date=2020-06-11|title=Law of the sea disputes can now be heard in Singapore under signed agreement {{!}} The Straits Times|url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/law-of-the-sea-disputes-can-now-be-heard-in-singapore-under-signed-agreement|access-date=2022-02-02|website=www.straitstimes.com|language=en}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="gr">{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/yiel/yvx077|title=3. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)|year=2016|last1=García-Revillo|first1=Miguel G.|journal=Yearbook of International Environmental Law|volume=27|pages=424–426}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="hf">{{cite news |last=Groves |first=Steven |title=Accession to U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea Would Expose the U.S. to Baseless Climate Change Lawsuits |url=https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/03/accession-to-un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea |publisher=The Heritage Foundation |date=March 12, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120314044246/https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/03/accession-to-un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea |archive-date=March 14, 2012}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="itlos">{{Cite web|title=International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Seat|url=https://www.itlos.org/en/main/general-information/seat-of-the-tribunal/|access-date=2022-02-02|website=www.itlos.org}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="pr">{{cite web |url=https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_293_en.pdf |title=Press release |date=September 27, 2019 |website=www.itlos.org |format=PDF|access-date=2020-10-28}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="singapore">{{Cite web|last=ITLOS|title=ITLOS AND SINGAPORE SIGN MODEL AGREEMENT TO ENABLE THE TRIBUNAL TO SIT IN SINGAPORE|url=https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_303_E.pdf}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="tw">{{cite news |title=Iran strikes in Strait of Hormuz as Middle East tanker tensions explode |url=https://www.tradewindsnews.com/tankers/iran-strikes-in-strait-of-hormuz-as-middle-east-tanker-tensions-explode/2-1-641469 |publisher=Trade Winds |date=July 22, 2019}}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Line 453: | Line 462: | ||
* {{Official}} | * {{Official}} | ||
* | * | ||
* , Berlin, |
* , Berlin, December 14, 2004 | ||
{{Portalbar|Law|Oceans|Politics}} | {{Portalbar|Law|Oceans|Politics}} |
Revision as of 14:24, 29 December 2022
Intergovernmental organization
International Tribunal for the Law of the SeaTribunal international du droit de la mer (French) | |
---|---|
Official logo | |
Seat | Hamburg, Germany |
Working languages | |
Judges from | 21 nations |
Leaders | |
• President | Judge Albert Hoffmann |
• Vice President | Judge Tomas Heidar |
Establishment | |
• UNCLOS adopted | December 10, 1982 |
• UNCLOS in force | November 16, 1994 |
Website http://www.itlos.org |
The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) is an intergovernmental organization created by the mandate of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. It was established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, signed at Montego Bay, Jamaica, on December 10, 1982. The Convention entered into force on November 16, 1994, and established an international framework for law over all ocean space, its uses and resources. The ITLOS is one of four dispute resolution mechanisms listed in Article 287 of the UNCLOS.
The Tribunal is based in Hamburg, Germany. The Convention also established the International Seabed Authority, with responsibility for the regulation of seabed mining beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, that is beyond the limits of the territorial sea, the contiguous zone and the continental shelf. There are currently 168 signatories, 167 states plus the European Union. As of 2021, holdouts included the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Composition
According to its founding statute, the Tribunal has a set of 21 judges who serve from a variety of states parties, "according to a method that intends to assure an equitable geographical representation".
At the request of Chile and the European Union, the Tribunal set up a special chamber composed of 5 judges to deal with the Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Community).
By agreement of the parties Ghana and Ivory Coast, the Tribunal formed a special chamber composed of 5 judges to deal with the Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire).
By agreement of the parties Mauritius and Maldives, the Tribunal formed a special chamber of 7 permanent judges and 2 ad hoc judges to deal with the Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives).
Seats
Disputes referred to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea or one of its chambers can be heard in Germany or in Singapore.
Current judges
. | Country | Name | Inauguration | President | Vice president |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cape Verde | José Luís Jesus | 1999 | 2008–2011 | |
2 | Poland | Stanisław Pawlak | 2005 | ||
3 | Japan | Shunji Yanai | 2005 | 2011–2014 | |
4 | Tanzania | James Kateka | 2005 | ||
5 | South Africa | Albert J. Hoffmann | 2005 | 2020–present | 2011–2014 |
6 | Algeria | Boualem Bouguetaia | 2008 | 2014–2017 | |
7 | South Korea | Paik Jin-hyun | 2009 | 2017–2020 | |
8 | Malta | David Attard | 2011 | 2017–2020 | |
9 | Ukraine | Markiyan Kulyk | 2011 | ||
10 | Mexico | Alonso Gómez-Robledo | 2014 | ||
11 | Iceland | Tomas Heiðar | 2014 | 2020–present | |
12 | Paraguay | Óscar Cabello Sarubbi | 2017 | ||
13 | India | Neeru Chadha | 2017 | ||
14 | Thailand | Kriangsak Kittichaisaree | 2017 | ||
15 | Russia | Roman Kolodkin | 2017 | ||
16 | Netherlands | Liesbeth Lijnzaad | 2017 | ||
17 | Chile | María Teresa Infante Caffi | 2020 | ||
18 | Jamaica | Kathy-Ann Brown | 2020 | ||
19 | Italy | Ida Caracciolo | 2020 | ||
20 | Cameroon | Maurice Kamga | 2020 | ||
21 | China | Duan Jielong | 2020 |
Former judges
Cases
No. | Name | Applicant | Respondent | Case began | Case ended | Disposition |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | The M/V "Saiga" Case | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Guinea | November 13, 1997 | December 4, 1997 | Judgment on prompt release |
2 | The M/V "Saiga" (No. 2) Case | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Guinea | January 13, 1998 | July 1, 1999 | Judgment on merits |
3 | Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases | New Zealand | Japan | July 30, 1999 | August 27, 1999 | Order on provisional measures |
4 | Australia | |||||
5 | The "Camouco" Case | Panama | France | January 17, 2000 | February 7, 2000 | Judgment on prompt release |
6 | The "Monte Confurco" Case | Seychelles | France | November 27, 2000 | December 18, 2000 | Judgment on prompt release |
7 | Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean | Chile / European Union | December 19, 2000 | December 16, 2009 | Terminated at request of parties | |
8 | The "Grand Prince" Case | Belize | France | March 21, 2001 | April 20, 2001 | Judgment on prompt release |
9 | The "Chaisiri Reefer 2" Case | Panama | Yemen | July 3, 2001 | July 13, 2001 | Terminated at request of parties |
10 | The MOX Plant Case | Ireland | United Kingdom | November 9, 2001 | December 3, 2001 | Order on provisional measures |
11 | The "Volga" Case | Russia | Australia | December 2, 2002 | December 23, 2002 | Judgment on prompt release |
12 | Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and Around the Straits of Johor | Malaysia | Singapore | September 5, 2003 | October 8, 2003 | Order on provisional measures |
13 | The "Juno Trader" Case | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Guinea-Bissau | November 18, 2004 | December 18, 2004 | Judgment on prompt release |
14 | The "Hoshinmaru" Case | Japan | Russia | July 6, 2007 | August 6, 2007 | Judgment on prompt release |
15 | The "Tomimaru" Case | Japan | Russia | July 6, 2007 | August 6, 2007 | Judgment on prompt release |
16 | Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal | Bangladesh / Myanmar | December 14, 2009 | March 14, 2012 | Judgment on merits | |
17 | Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area | International Seabed Authority | May 14, 2010 | February 1, 2011 | Advisory opinion | |
18 | The M/V "Louisa" Case | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Spain | November 24, 2010 | May 28, 2013 | Judgment on merits |
19 | The M/V "Virginia G" Case | Panama / Guinea-Bissau | July 4, 2011 | April 14, 2014 | Judgment on merits | |
20 | The "ARA Libertad" Case | Argentina | Ghana | November 14, 2012 | December 15, 2012 | Order on provisional measures |
21 | Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC) | Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission | March 28, 2013 | April 2, 2015 | Advisory opinion | |
22 | The "Arctic Sunrise" Case | Netherlands | Russia | October 21, 2013 | November 22, 2013 | Order on provisional measures |
23 | Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean | Ghana / Ivory Coast | December 3, 2014 | September 23, 2017 | Judgment on merits | |
24 | The "Enrica Lexie" Incident | Italy | India | July 21, 2015 | August 24, 2015 | Order on provisional measures |
25 | The M/V "Norstar" Case | Panama | Italy | December 17, 2015 | April 10, 2019 | Judgment on merits |
26 | Case concerning the Detention of Three Ukrainian Naval Vessels | Ukraine | Russia | April 16, 2019 | May 25, 2019 | Order on provisional measures |
27 | The M/T "San Padre Pio" Case | Switzerland | Nigeria | May 21, 2019 | July 6, 2019 | Order on provisional measures |
28 | Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean | Mauritius / Maldives | September 24, 2019 | Ongoing | ||
29 | The M/T "San Padre Pio" (No. 2) Case | Switzerland / Nigeria | December 17, 2019 | December 29, 2021 | Terminated at request of parties | |
30 | The M/T "Heroic Idun" Case | Marshall Islands | Equatorial Guinea | November 10, 2022 | November 15, 2022 | Terminated at request of applicant |
31 | Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law | Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law | December 12, 2022 | Ongoing | ||
Notes
|
References
- SM Mitchell; EJ Powell. "Forum Shopping for the Best Adjudicator: Conflict Management and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos)" (PDF). APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper. American Political Science Association.
- Groves, Steven (March 12, 2012). "Accession to U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea Would Expose the U.S. to Baseless Climate Change Lawsuits". The Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on March 14, 2012.
- "Iran strikes in Strait of Hormuz as Middle East tanker tensions explode". Trade Winds. July 22, 2019.
- García-Revillo, Miguel G. (2016). "3. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)". Yearbook of International Environmental Law. 27: 424–426. doi:10.1093/yiel/yvx077.
- "Press release" (PDF). www.itlos.org. September 27, 2019. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
- "International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Seat". www.itlos.org. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
- ITLOS. "ITLOS AND SINGAPORE SIGN MODEL AGREEMENT TO ENABLE THE TRIBUNAL TO SIT IN SINGAPORE" (PDF).
- Auto, Hermes (June 11, 2020). "Law of the sea disputes can now be heard in Singapore under signed agreement | The Straits Times". www.straitstimes.com. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
External links
- Official website
- International Foundation for the Law of the Sea
- Privileges and Immunities, Berlin, December 14, 2004
53°33′04″N 9°51′03″E / 53.55111°N 9.85083°E / 53.55111; 9.85083
Categories: