Misplaced Pages

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:34, 29 December 2022 editKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 edits External links← Previous edit Revision as of 14:24, 29 December 2022 edit undoKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 editsm Arranged references with script | wp:datescript-assisted date/terms audit; see wp:unlinkdates, wp:overlinkNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Intergovernmental organization}} {{short description|Intergovernmental organization}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}} {{Use mdy dates|date=April 2022}}
{{Infobox Geopolitical organization {{Infobox Geopolitical organization
|conventional_long_name = International Tribunal<br />for the Law of the Sea |conventional_long_name = International Tribunal<br />for the Law of the Sea
Line 28: Line 28:
|leader_name2 = {{flagicon|Iceland}} Judge Tomas Heidar |leader_name2 = {{flagicon|Iceland}} Judge Tomas Heidar
|established_event1 = {{nowrap|] adopted}} |established_event1 = {{nowrap|] adopted}}
|established_date1 = 10 December 1982 |established_date1 = December 10, 1982
|established_event2 = UNCLOS in force |established_event2 = UNCLOS in force
|established_date2 = 16 November 1994 |established_date2 = November 16, 1994
|official_website = |official_website =
}} }}
], close to the River ]]] ], close to the River ]]]


The '''International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea''' ('''ITLOS''') is an ] created by the mandate of the ]. It was established by the ], signed at ], on 10 December 1982. The Convention entered into force on 16 November 1994, and established an international framework for law over all ocean space, its uses and resources. The ITLOS is one of four ] listed in Article 287 of the UNCLOS.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=SM Mitchell |author2=EJ Powell |title=Forum Shopping for the Best Adjudicator: Conflict Management and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos) |url=http://www.saramitchell.org/pmunclos.pdf |journal=APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper |publisher=American Political Science Association}}</ref> The '''International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea''' ('''ITLOS''') is an ] created by the mandate of the ]. It was established by the ], signed at ], on December 10, 1982. The Convention entered into force on November 16, 1994, and established an international framework for law over all ocean space, its uses and resources. The ITLOS is one of four ] listed in Article 287 of the UNCLOS.<ref name="best" />


The Tribunal is based in ], Germany. The Convention also established the ], with responsibility for the regulation of ] beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, that is beyond the limits of the territorial sea, the contiguous zone and the continental shelf. There are currently 168 signatories, 167 states plus the ]. As of 2021, holdouts included the ]<ref name=hf>{{cite news |last=Groves |first=Steven |title=Accession to U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea Would Expose the U.S. to Baseless Climate Change Lawsuits |url=https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/03/accession-to-un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea |publisher=The Heritage Foundation |date=12 March 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120314044246/https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/03/accession-to-un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea |archive-date=14 March 2012}}</ref> and the ].<ref name=tw>{{cite news |title=Iran strikes in Strait of Hormuz as Middle East tanker tensions explode |url=https://www.tradewindsnews.com/tankers/iran-strikes-in-strait-of-hormuz-as-middle-east-tanker-tensions-explode/2-1-641469 |publisher=Trade Winds |date=22 July 2019}}</ref> The Tribunal is based in ], Germany. The Convention also established the ], with responsibility for the regulation of ] beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, that is beyond the limits of the territorial sea, the contiguous zone and the continental shelf. There are currently 168 signatories, 167 states plus the ]. As of 2021, holdouts included the ]<ref name="hf" /> and the ].<ref name="tw" />


==Composition== ==Composition==
According to its founding statute, the Tribunal has a set of 21 judges who serve from a variety of states parties, "according to a method that intends to assure an ] geographical representation".<ref name=gr>{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/yiel/yvx077|title=3. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)|year=2016|last1=García-Revillo|first1=Miguel G.|journal=Yearbook of International Environmental Law|volume=27|pages=424–426}}</ref> According to its founding statute, the Tribunal has a set of 21 judges who serve from a variety of states parties, "according to a method that intends to assure an ] geographical representation".<ref name="gr" />


At the request of ] and the European Union, the Tribunal set up a special chamber composed of 5 judges to deal with the ''Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Community)''. At the request of ] and the European Union, the Tribunal set up a special chamber composed of 5 judges to deal with the ''Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Community)''.
Line 46: Line 46:
By agreement of the parties ] and ], the Tribunal formed a special chamber composed of 5 judges to deal with the ''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire)''. By agreement of the parties ] and ], the Tribunal formed a special chamber composed of 5 judges to deal with the ''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire)''.


By agreement of the parties ] and ], the Tribunal formed a special chamber of 7 permanent judges and 2 ''ad hoc'' judges to deal with the ''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives)''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_293_en.pdf |title=Press release |date=27 September 2019 |website=www.itlos.org |format=PDF|access-date=2020-10-28}}</ref> By agreement of the parties ] and ], the Tribunal formed a special chamber of 7 permanent judges and 2 ''ad hoc'' judges to deal with the ''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives)''.<ref name="pr" />


== Seats == == Seats ==
Disputes referred to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea or one of its chambers can be heard in Germany<ref name="itlos" /> or in Singapore.<ref name="singapore" /><ref name="disputes" />
Disputes referred to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea or one of its chambers can be heard in Germany<ref>{{Cite web|title=International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Seat|url=https://www.itlos.org/en/main/general-information/seat-of-the-tribunal/|access-date=2022-02-02|website=www.itlos.org}}</ref> or in Singapore.<ref>{{Cite web|last=ITLOS|title=ITLOS AND SINGAPORE SIGN MODEL AGREEMENT TO ENABLE THE TRIBUNAL TO SIT IN SINGAPORE|url=https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_303_E.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Auto|first=Hermes|date=2020-06-11|title=Law of the sea disputes can now be heard in Singapore under signed agreement {{!}} The Straits Times|url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/law-of-the-sea-disputes-can-now-be-heard-in-singapore-under-signed-agreement|access-date=2022-02-02|website=www.straitstimes.com|language=en}}</ref>


==Current judges== ==Current judges==
Line 212: Line 212:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea}}
| {{Dts|13 November 1997}} | {{Dts|link=off|November 13, 1997}}
| {{Dts|4 December 1997}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 4, 1997}}
| Judgment on prompt release | Judgment on prompt release
|- |-
Line 220: Line 220:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea}}
| {{Dts|13 January 1998}} | {{Dts|link=off|January 13, 1998}}
| {{Dts|1 July 1999}} | {{Dts|link=off|July 1, 1999}}
| Judgment on merits | Judgment on merits
|- |-
Line 228: Line 228:
| align="center" | {{Flag|New Zealand}} | align="center" | {{Flag|New Zealand}}
| rowspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | rowspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}}
| rowspan="2" | {{Dts|30 July 1999}} | rowspan="2" | {{Dts|link=off|July 30, 1999}}
| rowspan="2" | {{Dts|27 August 1999}} | rowspan="2" | {{Dts|link=off|August 27, 1999}}
| rowspan="2" | Order on provisional measures | rowspan="2" | Order on provisional measures
|- |-
Line 239: Line 239:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | align="center" | {{Flag|France}}
| {{Dts|17 January 2000}} | {{Dts|link=off|January 17, 2000}}
| {{Dts|7 February 2000}} | {{Dts|link=off|February 7, 2000}}
| Judgment on prompt release | Judgment on prompt release
|- |-
Line 247: Line 247:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Seychelles}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Seychelles}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | align="center" | {{Flag|France}}
| {{Dts|27 November 2000}} | {{Dts|link=off|November 27, 2000}}
| {{Dts|18 December 2000}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 18, 2000}}
| Judgment on prompt release | Judgment on prompt release
|- |-
| 7 | 7
| {{Sort|Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean|''Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean''}} | {{Sort|Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean|''Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean''}}
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Chile}}&nbsp;/ {{Flag|European Union}}{{Efn|group=upper-alpha|The European Union replaced and succeeded the {{Flag|European Economic Community|name=European Community}} as a party to the case on 1 December 2009.}} | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Chile}}&nbsp;/ {{Flag|European Union}}{{Efn|group=upper-alpha|The European Union replaced and succeeded the {{Flag|European Economic Community|name=European Community}} as a party to the case on December 1, 2009.}}
| {{Dts|19 December 2000}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 19, 2000}}
| {{Dts|16 December 2009}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 16, 2009}}
| Terminated at request of parties | Terminated at request of parties
|- |-
Line 262: Line 262:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Belize}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Belize}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | align="center" | {{Flag|France}}
| {{Dts|21 March 2001}} | {{Dts|link=off|March 21, 2001}}
| {{Dts|20 April 2001}} | {{Dts|link=off|April 20, 2001}}
| Judgment on prompt release | Judgment on prompt release
|- |-
Line 270: Line 270:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Yemen}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Yemen}}
| {{Dts|3 July 2001}} | {{Dts|link=off|July 3, 2001}}
| {{Dts|13 July 2001}} | {{Dts|link=off|July 13, 2001}}
| Terminated at request of parties | Terminated at request of parties
|- |-
Line 278: Line 278:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Ireland}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Ireland}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|United Kingdom}} | align="center" | {{Flag|United Kingdom}}
| {{Dts|9 November 2001}} | {{Dts|link=off|November 9, 2001}}
| {{Dts|3 December 2001}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 3, 2001}}
| Order on provisional measures | Order on provisional measures
|- |-
Line 286: Line 286:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Australia}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Australia}}
| {{Dts|2 December 2002}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 2, 2002}}
| {{Dts|23 December 2002}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 23, 2002}}
| Judgment on prompt release | Judgment on prompt release
|- |-
Line 294: Line 294:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Malaysia}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Malaysia}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Singapore}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Singapore}}
| {{Dts|5 September 2003}} | {{Dts|link=off|September 5, 2003}}
| {{Dts|8 October 2003}} | {{Dts|link=off|October 8, 2003}}
| Order on provisional measures | Order on provisional measures
|- |-
Line 302: Line 302:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea-Bissau}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea-Bissau}}
| {{Dts|18 November 2004}} | {{Dts|link=off|November 18, 2004}}
| {{Dts|18 December 2004}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 18, 2004}}
| Judgment on prompt release | Judgment on prompt release
|- |-
Line 310: Line 310:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}}
| {{Dts|6 July 2007}} | {{Dts|link=off|July 6, 2007}}
| {{Dts|6 August 2007}} | {{Dts|link=off|August 6, 2007}}
| Judgment on prompt release | Judgment on prompt release
|- |-
Line 318: Line 318:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}}
| {{Dts|6 July 2007}} | {{Dts|link=off|July 6, 2007}}
| {{Dts|6 August 2007}} | {{Dts|link=off|August 6, 2007}}
| Judgment on prompt release | Judgment on prompt release
|- |-
Line 325: Line 325:
| {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal''}} | {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal''}}
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Bangladesh}}&nbsp;/ {{Flag|Myanmar}} | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Bangladesh}}&nbsp;/ {{Flag|Myanmar}}
| {{Dts|14 December 2009}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 14, 2009}}
| {{Dts|14 March 2012}} | {{Dts|link=off|March 14, 2012}}
| Judgment on merits | Judgment on merits
|- |-
Line 332: Line 332:
| ''Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area'' | ''Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area''
| colspan="2" align="center" | ] | colspan="2" align="center" | ]
| {{Dts|14 May 2010}} | {{Dts|link=off|May 14, 2010}}
| {{Dts|1 February 2011}} | {{Dts|link=off|February 1, 2011}}
| Advisory opinion | Advisory opinion
|- |-
Line 340: Line 340:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Spain}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Spain}}
| {{Dts|24 November 2010}} | {{Dts|link=off|November 24, 2010}}
| {{Dts|28 May 2013}} | {{Dts|link=off|May 28, 2013}}
| Judgment on merits | Judgment on merits
|- |-
Line 347: Line 347:
| {{Sort|Virginia G|''The M/V "Virginia G" Case''}} | {{Sort|Virginia G|''The M/V "Virginia G" Case''}}
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}}&nbsp;/ {{Flag|Guinea-Bissau}} | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}}&nbsp;/ {{Flag|Guinea-Bissau}}
| {{Dts|4 July 2011}} | {{Dts|link=off|July 4, 2011}}
| {{Dts|14 April 2014}} | {{Dts|link=off|April 14, 2014}}
| Judgment on merits | Judgment on merits
|- |-
Line 355: Line 355:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Argentina}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Argentina}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Ghana}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Ghana}}
| {{Dts|14 November 2012}} | {{Dts|link=off|November 14, 2012}}
| {{Dts|15 December 2012}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 15, 2012}}
| Order on provisional measures | Order on provisional measures
|- |-
Line 362: Line 362:
| ''Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC)'' | ''Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC)''
| colspan="2" align="center" | Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission | colspan="2" align="center" | Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission
| {{Dts|28 March 2013}} | {{Dts|link=off|March 28, 2013}}
| {{Dts|2 April 2015}} | {{Dts|link=off|April 2, 2015}}
| Advisory opinion | Advisory opinion
|- |-
Line 370: Line 370:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Kingdom of the Netherlands|name=Netherlands}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Kingdom of the Netherlands|name=Netherlands}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}}
| {{Dts|21 October 2013}} | {{Dts|link=off|October 21, 2013}}
| {{Dts|22 November 2013}} | {{Dts|link=off|November 22, 2013}}
| Order on provisional measures | Order on provisional measures
|- |-
Line 377: Line 377:
| {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean''}} | {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean''}}
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Ghana}}&nbsp;/ {{Flag|Ivory Coast}} | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Ghana}}&nbsp;/ {{Flag|Ivory Coast}}
| {{Dts|3 December 2014}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 3, 2014}}
| {{Dts|23 September 2017}} | {{Dts|link=off|September 23, 2017}}
| Judgment on merits | Judgment on merits
|- |-
Line 385: Line 385:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Italy}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Italy}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|India}} | align="center" | {{Flag|India}}
| {{Dts|21 July 2015}} | {{Dts|link=off|July 21, 2015}}
| {{Dts|24 August 2015}} | {{Dts|link=off|August 24, 2015}}
| Order on provisional measures | Order on provisional measures
|- |-
Line 393: Line 393:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Italy}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Italy}}
| {{Dts|17 December 2015}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 17, 2015}}
| {{Dts|10 April 2019}} | {{Dts|link=off|April 10, 2019}}
| Judgment on merits | Judgment on merits
|- |-
Line 401: Line 401:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Ukraine}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Ukraine}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}}
| {{Dts|16 April 2019}} | {{Dts|link=off|April 16, 2019}}
| {{Dts|25 May 2019}} | {{Dts|link=off|May 25, 2019}}
| Order on provisional measures | Order on provisional measures
|- |-
Line 409: Line 409:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Switzerland}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Switzerland}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Nigeria}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Nigeria}}
| {{Dts|21 May 2019}} | {{Dts|link=off|May 21, 2019}}
| {{Dts|6 July 2019}} | {{Dts|link=off|July 6, 2019}}
| Order on provisional measures | Order on provisional measures
|- |-
Line 416: Line 416:
| {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean''}} | {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean''}}
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Mauritius}}&nbsp;/ {{Flag|Maldives}} | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Mauritius}}&nbsp;/ {{Flag|Maldives}}
| {{Dts|24 September 2019}} | {{Dts|link=off|September 24, 2019}}
| ''Ongoing'' | ''Ongoing''
| |
Line 423: Line 423:
| {{Sort|San Padre Pio|''The M/T "San Padre Pio" (No. 2) Case''}} | {{Sort|San Padre Pio|''The M/T "San Padre Pio" (No. 2) Case''}}
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Switzerland}}&nbsp;/ {{Flag|Nigeria}} | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Switzerland}}&nbsp;/ {{Flag|Nigeria}}
| {{Dts|17 December 2019}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 17, 2019}}
| {{Dts|29 December 2021}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 29, 2021}}
| Terminated at request of parties | Terminated at request of parties
|- |-
Line 431: Line 431:
| align="center" | {{Flag|Marshall Islands}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Marshall Islands}}
| align="center" | {{Flag|Equatorial Guinea}} | align="center" | {{Flag|Equatorial Guinea}}
| {{Dts|10 November 2022}} | {{Dts|link=off|November 10, 2022}}
| {{Dts|15 November 2022}} | {{Dts|link=off|November 15, 2022}}
| Terminated at request of applicant | Terminated at request of applicant
|- |-
Line 438: Line 438:
| ''Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law'' | ''Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law''
| colspan="2" align="center" | Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law | colspan="2" align="center" | Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law
| {{Dts|12 December 2022}} | {{Dts|link=off|December 12, 2022}}
| ''Ongoing'' | ''Ongoing''
| |
Line 447: Line 447:


==References== ==References==
{{reflist|refs=
{{Reflist}}
<ref name="best">{{cite journal |author1=SM Mitchell |author2=EJ Powell |title=Forum Shopping for the Best Adjudicator: Conflict Management and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos) |url=http://www.saramitchell.org/pmunclos.pdf |journal=APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper |publisher=American Political Science Association}}</ref>
<ref name="disputes">{{Cite web|last=Auto|first=Hermes|date=2020-06-11|title=Law of the sea disputes can now be heard in Singapore under signed agreement {{!}} The Straits Times|url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/law-of-the-sea-disputes-can-now-be-heard-in-singapore-under-signed-agreement|access-date=2022-02-02|website=www.straitstimes.com|language=en}}</ref>
<ref name="gr">{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/yiel/yvx077|title=3. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)|year=2016|last1=García-Revillo|first1=Miguel G.|journal=Yearbook of International Environmental Law|volume=27|pages=424–426}}</ref>
<ref name="hf">{{cite news |last=Groves |first=Steven |title=Accession to U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea Would Expose the U.S. to Baseless Climate Change Lawsuits |url=https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/03/accession-to-un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea |publisher=The Heritage Foundation |date=March 12, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120314044246/https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/03/accession-to-un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea |archive-date=March 14, 2012}}</ref>
<ref name="itlos">{{Cite web|title=International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Seat|url=https://www.itlos.org/en/main/general-information/seat-of-the-tribunal/|access-date=2022-02-02|website=www.itlos.org}}</ref>
<ref name="pr">{{cite web |url=https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_293_en.pdf |title=Press release |date=September 27, 2019 |website=www.itlos.org |format=PDF|access-date=2020-10-28}}</ref>
<ref name="singapore">{{Cite web|last=ITLOS|title=ITLOS AND SINGAPORE SIGN MODEL AGREEMENT TO ENABLE THE TRIBUNAL TO SIT IN SINGAPORE|url=https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_303_E.pdf}}</ref>
<ref name="tw">{{cite news |title=Iran strikes in Strait of Hormuz as Middle East tanker tensions explode |url=https://www.tradewindsnews.com/tankers/iran-strikes-in-strait-of-hormuz-as-middle-east-tanker-tensions-explode/2-1-641469 |publisher=Trade Winds |date=July 22, 2019}}</ref>
}}


==External links== ==External links==
Line 453: Line 462:
* {{Official}} * {{Official}}
* *
* , Berlin, 14 December 2004 * , Berlin, December 14, 2004


{{Portalbar|Law|Oceans|Politics}} {{Portalbar|Law|Oceans|Politics}}

Revision as of 14:24, 29 December 2022

Intergovernmental organization

International Tribunal
for the Law of the SeaTribunal international du
droit de la mer
 (French)
Official logo of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Official logo
SeatGermany Hamburg, Germany
Working
languages
Judges from21 nations
Leaders
• President South Africa Judge Albert Hoffmann
• Vice President Iceland Judge Tomas Heidar
Establishment
• UNCLOS adopted December 10, 1982
• UNCLOS in force November 16, 1994
Website
http://www.itlos.org
ITLOS seen from Elbchaussee, close to the River Elbe

The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) is an intergovernmental organization created by the mandate of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. It was established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, signed at Montego Bay, Jamaica, on December 10, 1982. The Convention entered into force on November 16, 1994, and established an international framework for law over all ocean space, its uses and resources. The ITLOS is one of four dispute resolution mechanisms listed in Article 287 of the UNCLOS.

The Tribunal is based in Hamburg, Germany. The Convention also established the International Seabed Authority, with responsibility for the regulation of seabed mining beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, that is beyond the limits of the territorial sea, the contiguous zone and the continental shelf. There are currently 168 signatories, 167 states plus the European Union. As of 2021, holdouts included the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Composition

According to its founding statute, the Tribunal has a set of 21 judges who serve from a variety of states parties, "according to a method that intends to assure an equitable geographical representation".

At the request of Chile and the European Union, the Tribunal set up a special chamber composed of 5 judges to deal with the Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Community).

By agreement of the parties Ghana and Ivory Coast, the Tribunal formed a special chamber composed of 5 judges to deal with the Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire).

By agreement of the parties Mauritius and Maldives, the Tribunal formed a special chamber of 7 permanent judges and 2 ad hoc judges to deal with the Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives).

Seats

Disputes referred to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea or one of its chambers can be heard in Germany or in Singapore.

Current judges

. Country Name Inauguration President Vice president
1 Cape Verde Cape Verde José Luís Jesus 1999 2008–2011
2 Poland Poland Stanisław Pawlak 2005
3 Japan Japan Shunji Yanai 2005 2011–2014
4 Tanzania Tanzania James Kateka 2005
5 South Africa South Africa Albert J. Hoffmann 2005 2020–present 2011–2014
6 Algeria Algeria Boualem Bouguetaia 2008 2014–2017
7 South Korea South Korea Paik Jin-hyun 2009 2017–2020
8 Malta Malta David Attard 2011 2017–2020
9 Ukraine Ukraine Markiyan Kulyk 2011
10 Mexico Mexico Alonso Gómez-Robledo 2014
11 Iceland Iceland Tomas Heiðar 2014 2020–present
12 Paraguay Paraguay Óscar Cabello Sarubbi 2017
13 India India Neeru Chadha 2017
14 Thailand Thailand Kriangsak Kittichaisaree 2017
15 Russia Russia Roman Kolodkin 2017
16 Netherlands Netherlands Liesbeth Lijnzaad 2017
17 Chile Chile María Teresa Infante Caffi 2020
18 Jamaica Jamaica Kathy-Ann Brown 2020
19 Italy Italy Ida Caracciolo 2020
20 Cameroon Cameroon Maurice Kamga 2020
21 China China Duan Jielong 2020

Former judges

Country Name Inauguration Until
Bulgaria Bulgaria Alexander Yankov 1996 2011
Russia Russia Anatoly Kolodkin 1996 2008
Brazil Brazil Antonio Cachapuz de Medeiros 2016 2016
Croatia Croatia Budislav Vukas 1996 2005
South Korea South Korea Choon-ho Park 1996 2008
France France Jean-Pierre Cot 2002 2020
United Kingdom United Kingdom David Heywood Anderson 1996 2005
Grenada Grenada Dolliver Nelson 1996 2014
Belize Belize Edward Arthur Laing 1996 2001
China China Gao Zhiguo 2008 2020
China China Xu Guangjian 2001 2007
Iceland Iceland Guðmundur Eiríksson 1996 2002
Austria Austria Helmut Türk 2005 2014
Argentina Argentina Hugo Caminos 1996 2011
Lebanon Lebanon Joseph Akl 1996 2017
Tanzania Tanzania Joseph Warioba 1996 2008
Argentina Argentina Elsa Kelly 2011 2020
Trinidad and Tobago Trinidad and Tobago Lennox Fitzroy Ballah 2002 2003
Senegal Senegal Tafsir Malick Ndiaye 1996 2020
China China Zhao Lihai 1996 2000
Trinidad and Tobago Trinidad and Tobago Anthony Lucky 2003 2020
Cameroon Cameroon Paul Engo 1996 2008
India India P. Chandrasekhara Rao 1996 2017
Germany Germany Rüdiger Wolfrum 1996 2017
Japan Japan Soji Yamamoto 1996 2005
Ghana Ghana Thomas Mensah 1996 2005
Italy Italy Tullio Treves 1996 2011
Brazil Brazil Vicente Marotta Rangel 1996 2015
Russia Russia Vladimir Golitsyn 2008 2017

Cases

No. Name Applicant Respondent Case began Case ended Disposition
1 The M/V "Saiga" Case  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines  Guinea November 13, 1997 December 4, 1997 Judgment on prompt release
2 The M/V "Saiga" (No. 2) Case  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines  Guinea January 13, 1998 July 1, 1999 Judgment on merits
3 Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases  New Zealand  Japan July 30, 1999 August 27, 1999 Order on provisional measures
4  Australia
5 The "Camouco" Case  Panama  France January 17, 2000 February 7, 2000 Judgment on prompt release
6 The "Monte Confurco" Case  Seychelles  France November 27, 2000 December 18, 2000 Judgment on prompt release
7 Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean  Chile /  European Union December 19, 2000 December 16, 2009 Terminated at request of parties
8 The "Grand Prince" Case  Belize  France March 21, 2001 April 20, 2001 Judgment on prompt release
9 The "Chaisiri Reefer 2" Case  Panama  Yemen July 3, 2001 July 13, 2001 Terminated at request of parties
10 The MOX Plant Case  Ireland  United Kingdom November 9, 2001 December 3, 2001 Order on provisional measures
11 The "Volga" Case  Russia  Australia December 2, 2002 December 23, 2002 Judgment on prompt release
12 Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and Around the Straits of Johor  Malaysia  Singapore September 5, 2003 October 8, 2003 Order on provisional measures
13 The "Juno Trader" Case  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines  Guinea-Bissau November 18, 2004 December 18, 2004 Judgment on prompt release
14 The "Hoshinmaru" Case  Japan  Russia July 6, 2007 August 6, 2007 Judgment on prompt release
15 The "Tomimaru" Case  Japan  Russia July 6, 2007 August 6, 2007 Judgment on prompt release
16 Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal  Bangladesh /  Myanmar December 14, 2009 March 14, 2012 Judgment on merits
17 Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area International Seabed Authority May 14, 2010 February 1, 2011 Advisory opinion
18 The M/V "Louisa" Case  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines  Spain November 24, 2010 May 28, 2013 Judgment on merits
19 The M/V "Virginia G" Case  Panama /  Guinea-Bissau July 4, 2011 April 14, 2014 Judgment on merits
20 The "ARA Libertad" Case  Argentina  Ghana November 14, 2012 December 15, 2012 Order on provisional measures
21 Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC) Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission March 28, 2013 April 2, 2015 Advisory opinion
22 The "Arctic Sunrise" Case  Netherlands  Russia October 21, 2013 November 22, 2013 Order on provisional measures
23 Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean  Ghana /  Ivory Coast December 3, 2014 September 23, 2017 Judgment on merits
24 The "Enrica Lexie" Incident  Italy  India July 21, 2015 August 24, 2015 Order on provisional measures
25 The M/V "Norstar" Case  Panama  Italy December 17, 2015 April 10, 2019 Judgment on merits
26 Case concerning the Detention of Three Ukrainian Naval Vessels  Ukraine  Russia April 16, 2019 May 25, 2019 Order on provisional measures
27 The M/T "San Padre Pio" Case   Switzerland  Nigeria May 21, 2019 July 6, 2019 Order on provisional measures
28 Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean  Mauritius /  Maldives September 24, 2019 Ongoing
29 The M/T "San Padre Pio" (No. 2) Case   Switzerland /  Nigeria December 17, 2019 December 29, 2021 Terminated at request of parties
30 The M/T "Heroic Idun" Case  Marshall Islands  Equatorial Guinea November 10, 2022 November 15, 2022 Terminated at request of applicant
31 Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law December 12, 2022 Ongoing
Notes
  1. The European Union replaced and succeeded the  European Community as a party to the case on December 1, 2009.

References

  1. SM Mitchell; EJ Powell. "Forum Shopping for the Best Adjudicator: Conflict Management and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos)" (PDF). APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper. American Political Science Association.
  2. Groves, Steven (March 12, 2012). "Accession to U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea Would Expose the U.S. to Baseless Climate Change Lawsuits". The Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on March 14, 2012.
  3. "Iran strikes in Strait of Hormuz as Middle East tanker tensions explode". Trade Winds. July 22, 2019.
  4. García-Revillo, Miguel G. (2016). "3. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)". Yearbook of International Environmental Law. 27: 424–426. doi:10.1093/yiel/yvx077.
  5. "Press release" (PDF). www.itlos.org. September 27, 2019. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
  6. "International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Seat". www.itlos.org. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
  7. ITLOS. "ITLOS AND SINGAPORE SIGN MODEL AGREEMENT TO ENABLE THE TRIBUNAL TO SIT IN SINGAPORE" (PDF).
  8. Auto, Hermes (June 11, 2020). "Law of the sea disputes can now be heard in Singapore under signed agreement | The Straits Times". www.straitstimes.com. Retrieved February 2, 2022.

External links

Portals:

53°33′04″N 9°51′03″E / 53.55111°N 9.85083°E / 53.55111; 9.85083

Categories: