Revision as of 17:18, 6 March 2007 editJoshuaZ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,657 edits Article suggestion← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:27, 6 March 2007 edit undoAnonEMouse (talk | contribs)13,200 edits →Article suggestion: DiscussNext edit → | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Your article suggestion has been repeatedly removed. I suggest that if you want such an article, you write it. ] 17:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC) | Your article suggestion has been repeatedly removed. I suggest that if you want such an article, you write it. ] 17:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
: Please discuss on the ] rather than revert war. --] <sup>]</sup> 17:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:27, 6 March 2007
Quack Talk: DiscussionHello, and Welcome to the Misplaced Pages, QuackGuru! Thanks for creating the "List of articles related to quackery" article. Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Misplaced Pages experience:
And some odds and ends: Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing four tildes: ~~~~. Best of luck, QuackGuru, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 20:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC) Thank You. --QuackGuru 23:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Scientific scepticismDid anyone save the old article? This is sort of nuts. However, it might be too difficult to protect this article without a concerted effort of people interested in science. We have several pseudoscience topics here that just flourish because there are not enough science people to go around to beat down the hordes.--Filll 00:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Article suggestionYour article suggestion has been repeatedly removed. I suggest that if you want such an article, you write it. JoshuaZ 17:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
|