| Revision as of 18:38, 3 January 2023 editMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,095 edits rm bot messages← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:37, 5 January 2023 edit undoGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers381,979 editsNo edit summaryTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| Thanks for helping out at ], but, well, the one that closed the AfD as "speedy keep" is the article creator, not the nom or an uninvolved editor. They have done this twice, and have also removed the AFD notice from the article repeatedly. I don't want to keep edit warring over it, better to let someone uninvolved handle it. ] (]) 12:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | Thanks for helping out at ], but, well, the one that closed the AfD as "speedy keep" is the article creator, not the nom or an uninvolved editor. They have done this twice, and have also removed the AFD notice from the article repeatedly. I don't want to keep edit warring over it, better to let someone uninvolved handle it. ] (]) 12:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :OK, didn't see that. I was just trying to fix the AfD close so that it didn't affect the rest of the discussions on ]. --] 12:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | :OK, didn't see that. I was just trying to fix the AfD close so that it didn't affect the rest of the discussions on ]. --] 12:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
| {{-}} | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Two}} | |||
| ]! --] (]) 07:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:37, 5 January 2023
Credit: Diego Delso
Subpages: Articles worked on · Good article reviews · GA standards · common.css · common.js
Archives as of the dates listed (250KB or more to load; threads more than 3 days to be archived by bot or earlier upon personal discretion; displayed in order of date of last thread):
- 2009-04-29 · 2009-10-17 · 2010-01-09 · 2010-04-27 · 2010-08-12 · 2010-11-21 · 2010-03-10 · 2011-08-07 · 2012-01-28 · 2012-09-17 · present
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
Birmal Hembram.
I just finished cleaning up the mess made by these two block evading accounts: User:Dolon Provas,User:Muchiram hansda. I'm not a big fan of allowing the Birmal Hembram. (with a period) article to existing for any amount of time, given it's provenance. Any objections to a speedy? The subject's name is not mentioned on any of the reliable sources; it's only mentioned on the two self-published sources. As far as I can tell, the medium source is simply a copy of one of the other articles with the subjects name inserted. OhNoitsJamie 14:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- I have no objections. It looked like the 2nd source was a little suspect, also. --MuZemike 14:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Page Amir Mohammad Nekounam
Hi,I have a request to remove the tags from Amir Mohammad Nekounam's page Reason:
I have added credible sources to Amir Mohammad Nekounam's page in the past few days A2004b (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Not how it works. Please comment at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Amir Mohammad Nekounam, as been pointed out to you several times. Continual removing of the tags from the page may result in your block from an admin. --MuZemike 16:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Please agree with me because I have added the desired resources and I do not know where the problem is and so I removed the tags but now I ask you to remove the tags according to the available resources A2004b (talk) 16:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Again, that's not how the process works. Please reread the comment I just made above and comment in the deletion discussion there. --MuZemike 16:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Church of Singapore
Thanks for helping out at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Church of Singapore, but, well, the one that closed the AfD as "speedy keep" is the article creator, not the nom or an uninvolved editor. They have done this twice, and have also removed the AFD notice from the article repeatedly. I don't want to keep edit warring over it, better to let someone uninvolved handle it. Fram (talk) 12:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- OK, didn't see that. I was just trying to fix the AfD close so that it didn't affect the rest of the discussions on WP:AFD/T. --MuZemike 12:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Two years! |
|---|
Happy new year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)