Misplaced Pages

Talk:Killing of the Haight family: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:43, 7 January 2023 editJohanneum (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,926 edits →Removal of picture← Previous edit Revision as of 22:50, 7 January 2023 edit undoWWGB (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,451 edits →Removal of picture: copyvioTag: use of deprecated (unreliable) sourceNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
Lets be reasonable....There are tons of newspaper articles that use this picture and that provides proof what the family looks like. Instead of deleting it why don't you wait for a consensus or provide proof that it is not the family picture? If all the pictures of the family are not proof what do you need? This is lame to even discuss that there is no proof this is the family. If there is no proof then how about there being no proof that any of this is true? We will restore it while we see if any agree with you of its removal. Lets be reasonable....There are tons of newspaper articles that use this picture and that provides proof what the family looks like. Instead of deleting it why don't you wait for a consensus or provide proof that it is not the family picture? If all the pictures of the family are not proof what do you need? This is lame to even discuss that there is no proof this is the family. If there is no proof then how about there being no proof that any of this is true? We will restore it while we see if any agree with you of its removal.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11603183/Michael-Haight-accused-killing-seven-members-family-including-five-children-Utah.html?fbclid=IwAR0UWLJmjo4PzR9OKGao8Em0cF1FqTXQ6-2Vb4Omrr-DfFRyvN64IaZlzOM ] (]) 15:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11603183/Michael-Haight-accused-killing-seven-members-family-including-five-children-Utah.html?fbclid=IwAR0UWLJmjo4PzR9OKGao8Em0cF1FqTXQ6-2Vb4Omrr-DfFRyvN64IaZlzOM ] (]) 15:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
:This is a clear copyright violation. see . ] (]) 22:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:50, 7 January 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Killing of the Haight family article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
WikiProject iconDisaster management C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Utah C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Utah.
WikiProject iconDeath C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removal of picture

Lets be reasonable....There are tons of newspaper articles that use this picture and that provides proof what the family looks like. Instead of deleting it why don't you wait for a consensus or provide proof that it is not the family picture? If all the pictures of the family are not proof what do you need? This is lame to even discuss that there is no proof this is the family. If there is no proof then how about there being no proof that any of this is true? We will restore it while we see if any agree with you of its removal. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11603183/Michael-Haight-accused-killing-seven-members-family-including-five-children-Utah.html?fbclid=IwAR0UWLJmjo4PzR9OKGao8Em0cF1FqTXQ6-2Vb4Omrr-DfFRyvN64IaZlzOM Johanneum (talk) 15:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

This is a clear copyright violation. see . WWGB (talk) 22:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Categories: