Misplaced Pages

User talk:Vizorblaze: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:13, 19 January 2023 editDoug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators264,209 edits January 2023: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 00:08, 20 January 2023 edit undoSpringee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,472 edits Notice: new sectionTags: Reverted contentious topics alert New topicNext edit →
Line 35: Line 35:
::Oh hell. I missed that. Let me take a look. ] ] 08:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC) ::Oh hell. I missed that. Let me take a look. ] ] 08:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
:::No, that was his email. You can’t use that to do research. ] ] 13:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC) :::No, that was his email. You can’t use that to do research. ] ] 13:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

== Notice ==

== Introduction to contentious topics ==
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently been editing post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people which has been designated a ]. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and ''does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your editing.''

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as '''contentious topics'''. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit '''carefully''' and '''constructively''', refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
:adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
:comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
:follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
:comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
:refrain from gaming the system.

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the ] or you may learn more about this contentious topic ]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first -->

Please also review Wp:HERE as well as wp:NPA. ] (]) 00:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:08, 20 January 2023

Welcome!

Hi Vizorblaze! I noticed your contributions to Talk:The Grayzone and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Dronebogus (talk) 11:26, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Cliven Bundy

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cliven Bundy. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Locke Coletc 05:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Stop icon Do not add personal information about other contributors to Misplaced Pages without their explicit permission. Misplaced Pages operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about another user is strictly prohibited under Misplaced Pages's harassment policy. Misplaced Pages's policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Misplaced Pages's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors will result in being blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 22:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

I apologize. He put his social media username on his own talk page when discussing coordinating offsite, so I thought it was allowed. Vizorblaze (talk) 22:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Oh hell. I missed that. Let me take a look. Doug Weller talk 08:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
No, that was his email. You can’t use that to do research. Doug Weller talk 13:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Notice

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently been editing post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please also review Wp:HERE as well as wp:NPA. Springee (talk) 00:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)