Misplaced Pages

Stanley Kramer: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:53, 13 January 2023 editQuietHere (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users43,617 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:46, 20 January 2023 edit undo65.151.179.242 (talk)No edit summaryTag: Disambiguation links addedNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
| birth_name = | birth_name =
| birth_date = {{Birth date|1913|9|29}} | birth_date = {{Birth date|1913|9|29}}
| birth_place = ], NY, U.S. | birth_place = ], U.S.
| death_date = {{Death date and age|2001|2|19|1913|9|29}} | death_date = {{Death date and age|2001|2|19|1913|9|29}}
| death_place = ], ], U.S. | death_place = ], California, U.S.
| occupation = {{hlist|Director|producer}} | occupation = {{hlist|Director|producer}}
| years_active = 1933–1997 | years_active = 1933–1997
Line 15: Line 15:
}} }}


'''Stanley Earl Kramer''' (September 29, 1913{{spaced ndash}}February 19, 2001) was an American film director and producer, responsible for making many of Hollywood's most famous "]" (he would call his movies ''heavy dramas'') and a liberal movie icon.<ref name="bbc">, a February 2001 ] obituary</ref> As an independent producer and director, he brought attention to topical social issues that most studios avoided. Among the subjects covered in his films were racism (in '']'' and '']''), ] (in '']''), ] (in '']''), ] vs. ] (in '']'') and the causes and effects of ] (in '']''). His other films included '']'' (1952, as producer), '']'' (1954, as producer), and '']'' (1965). '''Stanley Earl Kramer''' (September 29, 1913{{spaced ndash}}February 19, 2001) was an American film director and producer, responsible for making many of Hollywood's most famous "]" (he called his movies ''heavy dramas'') and a liberal movie icon.<ref name="bbc">, a February 2001 BBC obituary</ref> As an independent producer and director, he brought attention to topical social issues that most studios avoided. Among the subjects covered in his films were racism (in '']'' and '']''), nuclear war (in '']''), greed (in '']''), ] vs. ] (in '']''), and the causes and effects of fascism (in '']''). His other films included '']'' (1952, as producer), '']'' (1954, as producer), and '']'' (1965).


Director ] described him as an "incredibly talented visionary",<ref name=tribute>{{YouTube|_QY_jVz8R78|"Tribute to Stanley Kramer"}} with ], ], ], ] and ]</ref> and "one of our great filmmakers, not just for the art and passion he put on screen, but for the impact he has made on the conscience of the world."<ref name="bbc" /> Kramer was recognized for his fierce independence as a producer-director, with author ] writing that "among the independents . . . none seemed more vocal, more liberal, more pugnacious than young Stanley Kramer." His friend ], during his acceptance speech at the 2015 ], honored Kramer's work, calling him "one of the great filmmakers of all time."<ref>, ''Deadline.com'', Jan. 12, 2015</ref><ref>, ''NY Daily News'', Jan. 12, 2015</ref> Director ] described him as an "incredibly talented visionary",<ref name=tribute>{{YouTube|_QY_jVz8R78|"Tribute to Stanley Kramer"}} and "one of our great filmmakers, not just for the art and passion he put on screen, but for the impact he has made on the conscience of the world."<ref name="bbc" /> Kramer was recognized for his fierce independence as a producer-director, with author ] writing that "among the independents...none seemed more vocal, more liberal, more pugnacious than young Stanley Kramer." His friend ], during his acceptance speech at the 2015 ], honored Kramer's work, calling him "one of the great filmmakers of all time."<ref>, ''Deadline.com'', Jan. 12, 2015</ref><ref>, ''NY Daily News'', Jan. 12, 2015</ref>


Despite uneven critical reception, both then and now, Kramer's body of work has received many awards, including 16 Academy Awards and 80 nominations, and he was nominated nine times as either producer or director.<ref name=Byman>Byman, Jeremy. ''Showdown at High Noon: Witch-hunts, Critics, and the End of the Western'', Scarecrow Press (2004) pp. 9, 29-45; 73-76; Ch. 5</ref> In 1961, he received the ]. In 1963, he was a member of the jury at the ].<ref name="Moscow1963">{{cite web |url=http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=1963 |title=3rd Moscow International Film Festival (1963) |access-date=2012-11-25 |work=MIFF |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130116210707/http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=1963 |archive-date=2013-01-16 }}</ref> In 1998, he was awarded the first ] Vanguard Award in recognition of "the strong social themes that ran through his body of work". In 2002, the ] was created, to be awarded to recipients whose work "dramatically illustrates provocative social issues".<ref name=tribute/> Despite uneven critical reception, both then and now, Kramer's body of work has received many awards, including 16 Academy Awards and 80 nominations, and he was nominated nine times as either producer or director.<ref name=Byman>Byman, Jeremy. ''Showdown at High Noon: Witch-hunts, Critics, and the End of the Western'', Scarecrow Press (2004) pp. 9, 29-45; 73-76; Ch. 5</ref> In 1961, he received the ]. In 1963, he was a member of the jury at the ].<ref name="Moscow1963">{{cite web |url=http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=1963 |title=3rd Moscow International Film Festival (1963) |access-date=2012-11-25 |work=MIFF |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130116210707/http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=1963 |archive-date=2013-01-16 }}</ref> In 1998, he was awarded the first ] Vanguard Award in recognition of "the strong social themes that ran through his body of work". In 2002, the ] was created, to be awarded to recipients whose work "dramatically illustrates provocative social issues".<ref name=tribute/>


== Early life == == Early life ==
Kramer was born in ], ]. His parents were ], and having separated when he was very young, he remembered little about his father.<ref name=Kramer/>{{rp|102}} His mother worked at a New York office of ], during which time his grandparents took care of him at home.<ref name=Spoto>Spoto, Donald. ''Stanley Kramer: Film Maker'', Putnam (1978)</ref>{{rp|23}} His uncle, Earl Kramer, worked in distribution at ]. Kramer was born in New York City. His parents were Jewish, and having separated when he was very young, he remembered little about his father.<ref name=Kramer/>{{rp|102}} His mother worked at a New York office of ], during which time his grandparents took care of him at home.<ref name=Spoto>Spoto, Donald. ''Stanley Kramer: Film Maker'', Putnam (1978)</ref>{{rp|23}} His uncle, Earl Kramer, worked in distribution at ].


Kramer attended ] in ], where he graduated at age fifteen. He then enrolled in ] where he became a member of the ] fraternity<ref name="2010directory">Membership Directory, 2010, Pi Lambda Phi Inc.</ref> and wrote a weekly column for the ''Medley'' newspaper. He graduated in 1933 at the age of nineteen with a degree in business administration. After developing a "zest for writing" with a newspaper, biographer ] wrote, Kramer was offered a paid internship in the writing department of ] and moved to Hollywood.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|23}} Until receiving that writing job, he had planned to enroll in law school.<ref name=NYTimes>Lyman, Rick. , ''New York Times'' February 21, 2001</ref> Kramer attended ] in the Bronx, where he graduated at age fifteen. He then enrolled in New York University, where he became a member of the ] fraternity<ref name="2010directory">Membership Directory, 2010, Pi Lambda Phi Inc.</ref> and wrote a weekly column for the ''Medley'' newspaper. He graduated in 1933 at the age of nineteen with a degree in business administration. After developing a "zest for writing" with a newspaper, biographer ] wrote, Kramer was offered a paid internship in the writing department of ] and moved to Hollywood.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|23}} Until receiving that writing job, he had planned to enroll in law school.<ref name=NYTimes>Lyman, Rick. , ''New York Times'' February 21, 2001</ref>


==Film career== ==Film career==
Line 31: Line 31:
Over the following years, during the period of the ], Kramer took odd jobs in the film industry: He worked as a set furniture mover and film cutter at ], as writer and researcher for ] and ], and associate producer with ]-] productions. Those years as an apprentice writer and editor helped him acquire an "exceptional aptitude" in editing and develop the ability to understand the overall structure of the films he worked on. They enabled him to later compose and edit "in camera," as he shot scenes.<ref name=Wakeman>Wakeman, John. Ed. ''World Film Directors: Volume II, 1945-1985'', H. W. Wilson Company, N.Y. (1988) pp. 538-544</ref> Over the following years, during the period of the ], Kramer took odd jobs in the film industry: He worked as a set furniture mover and film cutter at ], as writer and researcher for ] and ], and associate producer with ]-] productions. Those years as an apprentice writer and editor helped him acquire an "exceptional aptitude" in editing and develop the ability to understand the overall structure of the films he worked on. They enabled him to later compose and edit "in camera," as he shot scenes.<ref name=Wakeman>Wakeman, John. Ed. ''World Film Directors: Volume II, 1945-1985'', H. W. Wilson Company, N.Y. (1988) pp. 538-544</ref>


He was drafted into the Army in 1943, during ], where he helped make training films with the ] in New York, along with other Hollywood filmmakers including ] and ].<ref name=NYTimes/> He left the army with the rank of first lieutenant.<ref name=LATimes>Dutka, Elaine. , ''Los Angeles Times'', Feb. 20, 2001</ref> He was drafted into the Army in 1943, during World War II, where he helped make training films with the ] in New York, along with other Hollywood filmmakers including ] and ].<ref name=NYTimes/> He left the army with the rank of first lieutenant.<ref name=LATimes>Dutka, Elaine. , ''Los Angeles Times'', Feb. 20, 2001</ref>


After the war, Kramer soon discovered that there were no available jobs in Hollywood in 1947, so he created an independent production company, Screen Plays Inc. He partnered with writer Herbie Baker, publicist ] and producer ], an army friend from the film unit. Foreman justified the production company by noting that the big studios had become "dinosaurs," which, being shocked by the onrush of television, "jettisoned virtually everything to survive." But they failed to develop cadres of younger creative talent in their wake.<ref name=Byman/> After the war, Kramer soon discovered that there were no available jobs in Hollywood in 1947, so he created an independent production company, Screen Plays Inc. He partnered with writer Herbie Baker, publicist ] and producer ], an army friend from the film unit. Foreman justified the production company by noting that the big studios had become "dinosaurs," which, being shocked by the onrush of television, "jettisoned virtually everything to survive." But they failed to develop cadres of younger creative talent in their wake.<ref name=Byman/>
Line 41: Line 41:
{{quote|Instead of relying on star names, we pinned our faith in stories that had something to say. If it happened to be something that other movies hadn't said before, so much the better. The only basis of choice was personal taste.<ref name=Byman/>}} {{quote|Instead of relying on star names, we pinned our faith in stories that had something to say. If it happened to be something that other movies hadn't said before, so much the better. The only basis of choice was personal taste.<ref name=Byman/>}}


The first movie produced under his production company was the comedy, '']'' (1948), directed by ], and based on ]'s ''The Big Town.'' It failed at the box office. It was followed with '']'' (1949), another Lardner story, this one about an ambitious and unscrupulous boxer. Scripted by Foreman, it was tailored to fit the talents of ], a former amateur wrestler who was now an actor. Filmed in only twenty-three days with a relatively small budget, it became an immense box-office success. It won an Academy Award for Best Editing, with four other nominations, including Douglas for best actor and Foreman as screenwriter. The first movie produced under his production company was the comedy '']'' (1948), directed by ], and based on ]'s ''The Big Town.'' It failed at the box office. It was followed with '']'' (1949), another Lardner story, this one about an ambitious and unscrupulous boxer. Written by Foreman, it was tailored to the talents of ], a former amateur wrestler who was now an actor. Filmed in only 23 days with a relatively small budget, it became an immense box-office success. It won an Academy Award for Best Editing, with four other nominations, including Douglas for best actor and Foreman as screenwriter.


Kramer next produced '']'' (also 1949), again directed by ], which became an even bigger success than ''Champion''. The story was adapted from a play by ], originally about ] in the army, but revised and made into a film about the persecution of a black soldier. Byman notes that it was the "first sound film about antiblack racism."<ref name=Byman/> The subject matter was so sensitive at the time, that Kramer shot the film in "total secrecy" to avoid protests by various organizations.<ref name=Byman/> Critics generally liked the film, which, notes ], "had a flavoring of courage."<ref name=Byman/> Kramer next produced '']'' (also 1949), again directed by ], which became an even bigger success than ''Champion''. The story was adapted from a play by ], originally about anti-Semitism in the army, but revised and made into a film about the persecution of a black soldier. Byman notes that it was the "first sound film about antiblack racism."<ref name=Byman/> The subject matter was so sensitive at the time, that Kramer shot the film in "total secrecy" to avoid protests by various organizations.<ref name=Byman/> Critics generally liked the film, which, notes ], "had a flavoring of courage."<ref name=Byman/>


His renamed Stanley Kramer Company produced '']'' (1950), which featured ]'s screen debut, in a drama about paraplegic war veterans. It was the first time Kramer and Foreman worked with director ], who had already been directing for twenty years and had won an Oscar. The film was another success for Kramer, who took on a unique subject dealing with a world few knew about. Critic ] noted that its "striking and authentic documentary quality has been imported to the whole film in every detail, attitude and word."<ref name=Byman/> His renamed Stanley Kramer Company produced '']'' (1950), which featured ]'s screen debut, in a drama about paraplegic war veterans. It was the first time Kramer and Foreman worked with director ], who had been directing for twenty years and had won an Oscar. The film was another success for Kramer, who took on a unique subject dealing with a world few knew about. Critic ] noted that its "striking and authentic documentary quality has been imported to the whole film in every detail, attitude and word."<ref name=Byman/>


Zinnemann said he was impressed with Kramer's company and the efficiency of their productions: Zinnemann said he was impressed with Kramer's company and the efficiency of their productions:
{{quote|They struck me as being enormously efficient. Kramer was very inventive in finding quite unlikely sources of finance . . . This method of outside financing . . . was truly original and far ahead of its time. . . There were no luxurious offices, no major-studio bureaucracy, no small internal empires to be dealt with, no waste of time or effort. . . I was enthusiastic about this independent setup and the energy it created.<ref name=Byman/>}} {{quote|They struck me as being enormously efficient. Kramer was very inventive in finding quite unlikely sources of finance...This method of outside financing...was truly original and far ahead of its time...There were no luxurious offices, no major-studio bureaucracy, no small internal empires to be dealt with, no waste of time or effort...I was enthusiastic about this independent setup and the energy it created.<ref name=Byman/>}}


Also released in 1950 was Kramer's production of '']'', the first English language film version of ]'s 1897 French play. It made a star of ], who won his only Oscar for Best Actor. Also released in 1950 was Kramer's production of '']'', the first English language film version of ]'s 1897 French play. It made a star of ], who won his only Oscar for Best Actor.


====Films with Columbia Pictures==== ====Films with Columbia Pictures====
In 1951, ] president ] offered Kramer's company an opportunity to form a production unit working with his studio.<ref name=Katz>Katz, Ephraim. ''The Macmillan International Film Encyclopedia'', Macmillan (1998) p.767</ref> Kramer was given free rein over what films he chose to make, along with a budget of nearly a million dollars each. Kramer agreed to a five-year contract during which time he would produce twenty films.<ref name=Kramer>Kramer, Stanley. ''A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World: a Life in Hollywood'', Harcourt Brace (1997)</ref>{{rp|116}}<ref name=LATimes/> However, Kramer would later state that the agreement was "one of the most dangerous and foolhardy moves of my entire career."<ref name=LATimes/> He agreed to the commitment because of his "deep-seated desire to direct," he states, along with the security of ready studio financing.<ref name=LATimes/> In 1951, ] president ] offered Kramer's company an opportunity to form a production unit working with his studio.<ref name=Katz>Katz, Ephraim. ''The Macmillan International Film Encyclopedia'', Macmillan (1998) p.767</ref> Kramer was given free rein over what films he chose to make, along with a budget of nearly a million dollars each. Kramer agreed to a five-year contract during which time he would produce 20 films.<ref name=Kramer>Kramer, Stanley. ''A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World: a Life in Hollywood'', Harcourt Brace (1997)</ref>{{rp|116}}<ref name=LATimes/> However, Kramer later stated that the agreement was "one of the most dangerous and foolhardy moves of my entire career."<ref name=LATimes/> He agreed to the commitment because of his "deep-seated desire to direct," he states, along with the security of ready studio financing.<ref name=LATimes/>


He finished his last independent production, '']'' (1952), a Western drama directed by ]. The movie was well received, winning four Oscars, as well as three other nominations. Unfortunately, ''High Noon''{{'}}s production and release intersected with ]. Writer, producer and partner ] was called before the ] while he was writing the film. Foreman had been a member of the ] ten years earlier, but declined to "name names" and was branded an "un-cooperative witness" by HUAC, and then ] by the Hollywood companies, after which he sold his interest in the company.<ref name=Byman/> Kramer, a long time friend and business partner of Carl Foreman removed Foreman's name from the credits as co-producer.<ref>Kirk Douglas, ''I am Spartacus! Making a film, breaking the Blacklist'', Open Road Integrated Media, New York, 2012 pp.19</ref> His last independent production was '']'' (1952), a Western drama directed by ]. The movie was well received, winning four Oscars, as well as three other nominations. Unfortunately, ''High Noon''{{'}}s production and release intersected with ]. Writer, producer and partner ] was called before the ] while he was writing the film. Foreman had been a member of the ] ten years earlier, but declined to "name names" and was branded an "un-cooperative witness" by HUAC, and then ] by the Hollywood companies, after which he sold his interest in the company.<ref name=Byman/> Kramer, a long time friend and business partner of Carl Foreman removed Foreman's name from the credits as co-producer.<ref>Kirk Douglas, ''I am Spartacus! Making a film, breaking the Blacklist'', Open Road Integrated Media, New York, 2012 pp.19</ref>


Kramer continued producing movies at Columbia, including '']'' (1951), '']'' (1952), '']'' (1952), '']'' (1953), '']'' (1953) and '']'' (1953). With a larger budget, his films took on a "glossier" more polished look, yet his next ten films all lost money, although some were nonetheless highly praised. Kramer continued producing movies at Columbia, including '']'' (1951), '']'' (1952), '']'' (1952), '']'' (1953), '']'' (1953) and '']'' (1953). With a larger budget, his films took on a "glossier" more polished look, yet his next 10 films all lost money, although some were nonetheless highly praised.


In 1953, Cohn and Kramer agreed to terminate the five-year, 20-film contract Kramer had signed. However, his last Columbia film, '']'' (1954), regained all of the losses Columbia had incurred as a result of his earlier projects. ''The Caine Mutiny'' was an adaptation of the book written by ] and was directed by ]. In 1953, Cohn and Kramer agreed to terminate the five-year, 20-film contract Kramer had signed. However, his last Columbia film, '']'' (1954), regained all of the losses Columbia had incurred as a result of his earlier projects. ''The Caine Mutiny'' was an adaptation of the book written by ] and was directed by ].
Line 67: Line 67:
] for '']''.]] ] for '']''.]]


After ''The Caine Mutiny'', Kramer left Columbia and resumed his independent productions, this time in the role of the director. Over the next two decades, Kramer reestablished his reputation within the film industry by directing a continual series of often successful films dealing with social and controversial issues, such as ], ], ] and the causes and effects of ]. Critic ] would later describe Kramer as "a guy who fought some hard battles. He took on social issues when it was not popular to do so in Hollywood."<ref name=LATimes/> After ''The Caine Mutiny'', Kramer left Columbia and resumed his independent productions, this time in the role of the director. Over the next two decades, Kramer reestablished his reputation within the film industry by directing a continual series of often successful films dealing with social and controversial issues, such as racism, nuclear war, greed and the causes and effects of fascism. Critic Charles Champlin later described Kramer as "a guy who fought some hard battles. He took on social issues when it was not popular to do so in Hollywood."<ref name=LATimes/>


Among some of those controversial films were '']'' (1955), '']'' (1957), '']'' (1958), '']'' (1959), '']'' (1960), '']'' (1961), and '']'' (1967). Among some of those controversial films were '']'' (1955), '']'' (1957), '']'' (1958), '']'' (1959), '']'' (1960), '']'' (1961), and '']'' (1967). In addition to dramas, he directed '']'' (1963).
Besides dramas, he also directed '']'' (1963) with an all-star cast of comedians.


His first film as director was '']'' (1955), the story of medical students and their career, some of whom lose their idealism and succumb to blind ambition, adultery, and immoral behavior. The film was a "smash hit," although reviews were mixed. ] claimed it "lacked rhythm and development."<ref name=Wakeman/> His first film as director was '']'' (1955), the story of medical students and their career, some of whom lose their idealism and succumb to blind ambition, adultery, and immoral behavior. The film was a "smash hit," but reviews were mixed. ] claimed it "lacked rhythm and development."<ref name=Wakeman/>


====''The Pride and the Passion'' (1957)==== ====''The Pride and the Passion'' (1957)====
Line 78: Line 77:


====''The Defiant Ones'' (1958)==== ====''The Defiant Ones'' (1958)====
The following year, Kramer directed '']'' (1958), the story of two escaped convicts in the Deep South, one black, played by ], and one white, ]. To add to the intensity of the drama, both men are shackled together with chains, forcing them, despite their wishes, into a sense of brotherhood, suffering The following year, Kramer directed '']'' (1958), the story of two escaped convicts in the Deep South, one black, played by ], and one white, ]. To add to the intensity of the drama, both men are shackled together with chains, forcing them, despite their wishes, into a sense of brotherhood, suffering and fear.
and fear.


''New York Times'' film critic ] lauded the production and the acting in the film, calling it "a remarkably apt and dramatic visualization of a social idea—the idea of men of different races brought together to face misfortune in a bond of brotherhood — is achieved by producer Stanley Kramer in his new film."<ref>Crowther, Bosley. ''The New York Times'', film review, September 25, 1958</ref> It was nominated for eight ], winning two. ''New York Times'' film critic Bosley Crowther lauded the production and the acting in the film, calling it "a remarkably apt and dramatic visualization of a social idea—the idea of men of different races brought together to face misfortune in a bond of brotherhood — is achieved by producer Stanley Kramer in his new film."<ref>Crowther, Bosley. ''The New York Times'', film review, September 25, 1958</ref> It was nominated for eight ], winning two.


Five years after the film was released, producer ] helped organize a showing of this, along with other Kramer films, at the ], which Kramer and co-star ] attended. Stevens writes that the showings of his films, especially ''The Defiant Ones'', were a "great success in Moscow." He remembers that "filmmakers applauded his films, often chanting ''Kraaaamer, Kraaaaamer, Kraaaaamer''," at their conclusion. Kramer spoke to the audience after each film, "making a fine impression for his country."<ref name=Stevens>Stevens, George Jr. ''Conversations with the Great Moviemakers of Hollywood's Golden Age'', Alfred A. Knopf (2006) pp. 558-584</ref> Stevens credits ''The Defiant Ones'' for having the most impact, however: Five years after the film was released, producer ] helped organize a showing of this, along with other Kramer films, at the ], which Kramer and co-star ] attended. Stevens writes that the showings of his films, especially ''The Defiant Ones'', were a "great success in Moscow." He remembers that "filmmakers applauded his films, often chanting ''Kraaaamer, Kraaaaamer, Kraaaaamer''," at their conclusion. Kramer spoke to the audience after each film, "making a fine impression for his country."<ref name=Stevens>Stevens, George Jr. ''Conversations with the Great Moviemakers of Hollywood's Golden Age'', Alfred A. Knopf (2006) pp. 558-584</ref> Stevens credits ''The Defiant Ones'' for having the most impact, however:
Line 87: Line 85:


====''On the Beach'' (1959)==== ====''On the Beach'' (1959)====
With his next film, '']'' (1959), Kramer tried to tackle the sensitive subject of nuclear war. The film takes place after World War III has annihilated most of the Northern hemisphere, with radioactive dust on a trajectory towards Australia. Kramer gave the film an "effective and eerie" documentary look at depopulated cities.<ref name=Wakeman/> It starred ], ], ] and ]. With '']'' (1959), Kramer tried to tackle the sensitive subject of nuclear war. The film takes place after World War III has annihilated most of the Northern hemisphere, with radioactive dust on a trajectory towards Australia. Kramer gave the film an "effective and eerie" documentary look at depopulated cities.<ref name=Wakeman/> It starred ], ], ] and ].


Reviews were mostly positive, not just from critics but from scientists. ], winner of two Nobel Prizes (Chemistry and Peace), commented: Reviews were mostly positive, not just from critics but from scientists. ], winner of two Nobel Prizes (Chemistry and Peace), commented:
Line 95: Line 93:
'']'' (1960) became Kramer's next challenging film, this one taking on the highly charged subjects of ] and ], and how they are taught in school. The film, an adaptation of the play of the same name, written by ] and ], was a fictionalized account of the 1925 ], which concerned a violation of Tennessee's Butler Act. This law had made it unlawful to teach human evolution in any state-funded school in Tennessee. It starred ], portraying the real ], defending the teacher, and ] as his rival attorney, ], who insisted that creationism was the only valid subject that should be taught to children. It was nominated for four Academy Awards.<ref> IMDb</ref> '']'' (1960) became Kramer's next challenging film, this one taking on the highly charged subjects of ] and ], and how they are taught in school. The film, an adaptation of the play of the same name, written by ] and ], was a fictionalized account of the 1925 ], which concerned a violation of Tennessee's Butler Act. This law had made it unlawful to teach human evolution in any state-funded school in Tennessee. It starred ], portraying the real ], defending the teacher, and ] as his rival attorney, ], who insisted that creationism was the only valid subject that should be taught to children. It was nominated for four Academy Awards.<ref> IMDb</ref>


For Tracy, who was nominated as Best Actor, the film would become the first of four films he did for Kramer. "Everybody tells me how good I am," he said, "but only Stanley gives me work."<ref name=LATimes/> The film received "extravagant reviews," yet failed at the box office due to its poor distribution and advertising.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|220}} In addition, fundamentalist groups labeled the film "anti-God" and called Kramer "anti-Christ."<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|220}} Kramer, however, explains that these groups failed to understand the real theme of the film and the actual court trial it portrayed: For Tracy, who was nominated as Best Actor, the film became the first of four films he did for Kramer. "Everybody tells me how good I am," he said, "but only Stanley gives me work."<ref name=LATimes/> The film received "extravagant reviews," yet failed at the box office due to its poor distribution and advertising.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|220}} In addition, fundamentalist groups labeled the film "anti-God" and called Kramer "anti-Christ."<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|220}} Kramer, however, explains that these groups failed to understand the real theme of the film and the actual court trial it portrayed:
{{quote|The spirit of the trial lives on, because the real issues of that trial were man's right to think and man's right to teach. . . the real theme of ''Inherit the Wind.''<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|223}}}} {{quote|The spirit of the trial lives on, because the real issues of that trial were man's right to think and man's right to teach...the real theme of ''Inherit the Wind.''<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|223}}}}


Kramer also notes that the film was the third part of a "trilogy of what have been called by some 'controversial pictures,'" of which the first two were ''The Defiant Ones'' and ''On the Beach''. "I have attempted, and I hope succeeded in, making pictures that command attention," said Kramer.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|223}} Kramer also notes that the film was the third part of a "trilogy of what have been called by some 'controversial pictures,'" of which the first two were ''The Defiant Ones'' and ''On the Beach''. "I have attempted, and I hope succeeded in, making pictures that command attention," said Kramer.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|223}}
Line 102: Line 100:
====''Judgment at Nuremberg'' (1961)==== ====''Judgment at Nuremberg'' (1961)====
] ]
Like his previous film, '']'' (1961) was a fictionalized account of a real trial, this one about the ] held after the defeat of the Nazis in World War II. It also starred ] as the leading judge, along with numerous other stars. ] played the American military prosecutor and ] the defense attorney. The film was nominated for eleven Academy Awards and won two, for Schell as Best Actor and ] for Best Screenplay.<ref> IMDb</ref> Reviews were extremely positive. Critic ] wrote in his review: Like his previous film, '']'' (1961) was a fictionalized account of a real trial, this one about the ] held after the defeat of the Nazis in World War II. It also starred Spencer Tracy as the leading judge, along with numerous other stars. ] played the American military prosecutor, and ] palyed the defense attorney. The film was nominated for 11 Academy Awards and won two: Schell as Best Actor and ] for Best Screenplay.<ref> IMDb</ref> Reviews were extremely positive. Critic ] wrote in his review:
{{quote|Stanley Kramer has once again used film importantly and continues to emerge as the only truly responsible moviemaker in Hollywood."<ref name=Wakeman/>}} Similarly, ] credited Kramer for the film's significance: "From first to last, the director is in command of his material. . . . he has not only added hugely to his stature as a producer-director, but to the stature of the American film as well."<ref name=Wakeman/> {{quote|Stanley Kramer has once again used film importantly and continues to emerge as the only truly responsible moviemaker in Hollywood."<ref name=Wakeman/>}} Similarly, ] credited Kramer for the film's significance: "From first to last, the director is in command of his material. ...he has not only added hugely to his stature as a producer-director, but to the stature of the American film as well."<ref name=Wakeman/>


However, despite mostly rave reviews in the U.S. and many countries in Europe, biographer Spoto notes that during its various premieres overseas, "it shocked many, angered some, disgusted others. But it bored no one. . . "<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|225}} Kramer described its world premiere, in Berlin, as "the most frightening evening in my life."<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|229}} It was attended by hundreds of dignitaries from throughout Germany. However, despite mostly rave reviews in the U.S. and many countries in Europe, biographer Spoto notes that during its various premieres overseas, "it shocked many, angered some, disgusted others. But it bored no one."<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|225}} Kramer described its world premiere, in Berlin, as "the most frightening evening in my life."<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|229}} It was attended by hundreds of dignitaries from throughout Germany.
{{quote| ] stood up and warned the audience that they might not find the film pleasant, but that if Berlin was ever to regard itself as a capital city, then this film should be shown there because it was about all of them. "We may like or dislike or disagree with many things," he said, "but here it is." <br /><br /> {{quote| ] stood up and warned the audience that they might not find the film pleasant, but that if Berlin was ever to regard itself as a capital city, then this film should be shown there because it was about all of them. "We may like or dislike or disagree with many things," he said, "but here it is." <br /><br />
Well, the film went on, and when it was over there was a deafening silence. . . . The film was totally rejected: it never did three cents' business in Germany. It played so many empty houses it just stopped.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|229}}}} Well, the film went on, and when it was over there was a deafening silence...The film was totally rejected: it never did three cents' business in Germany. It played so many empty houses it just stopped.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|229}}}}


], who had a supporting role, recalls that prior to filming, Kramer and screenwriter ] required that everyone involved in the production, actors and crew alike, watch some films taken by American soldiers at the liberation of the concentration camps. "They wanted us to understand what this film was about": ], who had a supporting role, recalls that prior to filming, Kramer and screenwriter Abby Mann required that everyone involved in the production, actors and crew alike, watch some films taken by American soldiers at the liberation of the concentration camps. "They wanted us to understand what this film was about":
{{quote|These films had not yet been released to the public; very few people had seen them. We didn't know what to expect. . . We watched scenes of bulldozers shoving piles of bodies into mass graves. We saw survivors, their eyes bulging, their bones practically protruding from their bodies. We saw the crematoriums and the piles of shoes. People gasped in shock, others started crying. Certainly it was the most horrifying thing I had ever seen in my life . . . But from that night on we understood the importance of the film we were making.<ref>Shatner, William. ''Up Till Now: The Autobiography'', Macmillan (2008) p. 76</ref>}} {{quote|These films had not yet been released to the public; very few people had seen them. We didn't know what to expect...We watched scenes of bulldozers shoving piles of bodies into mass graves. We saw survivors, their eyes bulging, their bones practically protruding from their bodies. We saw the crematoriums and the piles of shoes. People gasped in shock, others started crying. Certainly it was the most horrifying thing I had ever seen in my life...But from that night on we understood the importance of the film we were making.<ref>Shatner, William. ''Up Till Now: The Autobiography'', Macmillan (2008) p. 76</ref>}}


====''It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World'' (1963)==== ====''It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World'' (1963)====
After the seriousness of his previous films, Kramer "felt compelled to answer" for the "lack of lightness" in his earlier films, writes Spoto. As a result, he directed '']'' (1963), a film with a "gifted, wacky crew of comedians."<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|257}} Kramer describes it as a "comedy about greed."<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|257}} According to one writer, he directed it "to prove he could also handle comedy" and hired many of the leading comedic actors of the previous decades, from silent star ] to emerging talent ]. Winters would later write that "Kramer was a man who took chances—as they say, he worked without a net."<ref name=Kramer/> After the seriousness of his previous films, Kramer "felt compelled to answer" for the "lack of lightness" in his earlier films, writes Spoto. As a result, he directed '']'' (1963), a film with a "gifted, wacky crew of comedians."<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|257}} Kramer describes it as a "comedy about greed."<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|257}} According to one writer, he directed it "to prove he could also handle comedy" and hired many of the leading comedic actors of the previous decades, from silent star ] to emerging talent ]. Winters later wrote that "Kramer was a man who took chances—as they say, he worked without a net."<ref name=Kramer/>


It played to mixed reviews with some criticizing its excessive comedy with too many comedians thereby losing its focus. Nonetheless, it was Kramer's biggest box office hit, and the public enjoyed its "socially disruptive and goofy" story and acting.<ref name=NYTimes/> Film critic ] writes that its "small army of actors—105 speaking roles—inflict mayhem on each other with cars, planes, explosives and other devices . . . is simply too much for the human eye and ear to respond to, let alone the funny bone," calling it "hard-core ]."<ref name=Wakeman/> It was nominated for six Academy Awards, winning for Best Sound Editing.<ref> IMDb</ref> It played to mixed reviews with some criticizing its excessive comedy with too many comedians thereby losing its focus. Nonetheless, it was Kramer's biggest box office hit, and the public enjoyed its "socially disruptive and goofy" story and acting.<ref name=NYTimes/> Film critic ] writes that its "small army of actors—105 speaking roles—inflict mayhem on each other with cars, planes, explosives and other devices...is simply too much for the human eye and ear to respond to, let alone the funny bone," calling it "hard-core slapstick."<ref name=Wakeman/> It was nominated for six Academy Awards, winning for Best Sound Editing.<ref> IMDb</ref>


====''Ship of Fools'' (1965)==== ====''Ship of Fools'' (1965)====
Line 123: Line 121:


====''Guess Who's Coming to Dinner'' (1967)==== ====''Guess Who's Coming to Dinner'' (1967)====
For his fourth film about the sensitive subject of ], he both directed and produced '']'' (1967), a groundbreaking story about ]. It starred ], ], and ], winning two Academy Awards with eight nominations. It has been listed in the top 100 films over the last 100 years by the ]. However, despite its popularity with the public and its box-office success, many critics gave it negative reviews. For his fourth film about the sensitive subject of anti-racism, he both directed and produced '']'' (1967), a groundbreaking story about interracial marriage. It starred Spencer Tracy, ], and ], winning two Academy Awards with eight nominations. It has been listed in the top 100 films over the last 100 years by the ]. However, despite its popularity with the public and its box-office success, many critics gave it negative reviews.


For Kramer and others involved in the production, it "was one of the most important events of their lives," writes Spoto.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|273}} Partly because it was the first film that touched the subject since the 1920s silent era. "No one would touch this most explosive of social issues" until Kramer took on the challenge. Co-star Sidney Poitier called the film "revolutionary," and stated why: For Kramer and others involved in the production, it "was one of the most important events of their lives," writes Spoto.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|273}} Partly because it was the first film that touched the subject since the 1920s silent era. "No one would touch this most explosive of social issues" until Kramer took on the challenge. Co-star Sidney Poitier called the film "revolutionary," and stated why:
{{quote|No producer, no director could get the money, nor would theaters in America book it. But Kramer made people look at the issue for the first time. . . He treated the theme with humor, but so delicately, so humanly, so lovingly that he made everyone look at the question for the very first time in film history!<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|227}}}} {{quote|No producer, no director could get the money, nor would theaters in America book it. But Kramer made people look at the issue for the first time...He treated the theme with humor, but so delicately, so humanly, so lovingly that he made everyone look at the question for the very first time in film history!<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|227}}}}


The film was also important as it was the last film role for ], who was aware while making the film that he was dying and did in fact die a few weeks after its completion. It was his fourth film directed by Kramer and his ninth with Hepburn, who was so shaken by Tracy's death, that she refused to watch the film after it was completed. Kramer called Tracy "the greatest actor I ever worked with."<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|280}} The film was also important as it was the last film role for Spencer Tracy, who was aware while making the film that he was dying and did in fact die a few weeks after its completion. It was his fourth film directed by Kramer and his ninth with Hepburn, who was so shaken by Tracy's death, that she refused to watch the film after it was completed. Kramer called Tracy "the greatest actor I ever worked with."<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|280}}


As a result of this film's commercial success, Kramer helped spur on Hollywood to reform its film marketing practices when it was observed that the film was doing excellent business everywhere in the US, including the Southern states where it was assumed that films with African American lead actors would never be accepted. As a result, the prominent presence of Black actors in films would never again be considered a factor in Hollywood film marketing and distribution.<ref name=Harris>{{cite book|last=Harris|first=Mark|title=Pictures at a Revolution: Five Movies and the Birth of the New Hollywood|isbn=978-0143115038|publisher=]|year=2008|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/picturesatrevolu0000harr}}</ref>{{rp|374}} However, Kramer, bothered by the film's negative reviews and wanting respect as an important film artist like ] and ], undertook a nine-college speaking tour to screen the film and discuss ]. The effort proved a dispiriting embarrassment for him with college students largely dismissing his film and preferring to discuss less conventional fare like '']'' directed by ].<ref name="Harris"/>{{rp|398–400}} As a result of this film's commercial success, Kramer helped spur on Hollywood to reform its film marketing practices when it was observed that the film was doing excellent business everywhere in the U.S., including the Southern states where it was assumed that films with African American lead actors never would be accepted. As a result, the prominent presence of Black actors in films never again was considered a factor in Hollywood film marketing and distribution.<ref name=Harris>{{cite book|last=Harris|first=Mark|title=Pictures at a Revolution: Five Movies and the Birth of the New Hollywood|isbn=978-0143115038|publisher=]|year=2008|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/picturesatrevolu0000harr}}</ref>{{rp|374}} However, Kramer, bothered by the film's negative reviews and wanting respect as an important film artist like ] and ], undertook a nine-college speaking tour to screen the film and discuss racial integration. The effort proved a dispiriting embarrassment for him with college students largely dismissing his film and preferring to discuss less conventional fare like '']'' directed by ].<ref name="Harris"/>{{rp|398–400}}


The film was Kramer's last major success, and his subsequent films were not profitable, although many had mixed reviews. Among those films were '']'' (1968), '']'' (1970), '']'' (1971), '']'' (1973), '']'' (1977), and '']'' (1979). '']'' was entered into the ] where Kramer won the Golden Prize for Direction.<ref name="Moscow1973">{{cite web |url=http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=1973 |title=8th Moscow International Film Festival (1973) |access-date=2013-01-03 |work=MIFF |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130116194922/http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=1973 |archive-date=2013-01-16 }}</ref> At the time of his retirement, he was attempting to bring a script entitled "Three Solitary Drinkers" to the screen, a film about a trio of alcoholics that he hoped would be played by ], ], and ].<ref></ref> The film was Kramer's last major success, and his subsequent films were not profitable, and many had mixed reviews. Among those films were '']'' (1968), '']'' (1970), '']'' (1971), '']'' (1973), '']'' (1977), and '']'' (1979). '']'' was entered into the ] where Kramer won the Golden Prize for Direction.<ref name="Moscow1973">{{cite web |url=http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=1973 |title=8th Moscow International Film Festival (1973) |access-date=2013-01-03 |work=MIFF |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130116194922/http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=1973 |archive-date=2013-01-16 }}</ref> At the time of his retirement, he was attempting to bring a script titled ''Three Solitary Drinkers'' to the screen, a film about a trio of alcoholics that he hoped would be played by Sidney Poitier, ], and ].<ref></ref>


==Retirement and death== ==Retirement and death==
In the 1980s, Kramer retired to Bellevue, Washington and wrote a column on movies for '']'' from 1980 to 1996.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20010220&slug=kramer20 | work=] | title=Director Stanley Kramer dies | date=February 20, 2001}}</ref> During this time, he hosted his own weekly movie show on then-independent television station ]. In the 1980s, Kramer retired to Bellevue, Washington and wrote a column on movies for ''The Seattle Times'' from 1980 to 1996.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20010220&slug=kramer20 | work=] | title=Director Stanley Kramer dies | date=February 20, 2001}}</ref> During this time, he hosted his own weekly movie show on then-independent television station ].


In 1986, he signed an agreement with Columbia Pictures to produce or direct two films, ''Chernobyl'' and ''Beirut'', but the deal fell through when ] left Columbia.<ref>{{Cite news |date=1987-05-20 |title=Kramer At Work At 'Chernboyl', 1st Film In Col Pact |pages=4, 38 |work=]}}</ref> Three years later, he agreed to make ''ERN'' starring ] but the project stalled. In 1991, he signed a deal with ] to direct and produce ''Bubble Man'', a project he had been working on since 1972, but it was not made.<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=]|title=Kramer's 'Bubble Man' nears fruition|date=October 7, 1991|page=20}}</ref> In 1986, he signed an agreement with Columbia Pictures to produce or direct two films, ''Chernobyl'' and ''Beirut'', but the deal fell through when ] left Columbia.<ref>{{Cite news |date=1987-05-20 |title=Kramer At Work At 'Chernboyl', 1st Film In Col Pact |pages=4, 38 |work=]}}</ref> Three years later, he agreed to make ''ERN'' starring ] but the project stalled. In 1991, he signed a deal with ] to direct and produce ''Bubble Man'', a project he had been working on since 1972, but it was not made.<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=]|title=Kramer's 'Bubble Man' nears fruition|date=October 7, 1991|page=20}}</ref>
Line 141: Line 139:
In 1997, Kramer published his autobiography ''A Mad Mad Mad Mad World: A Life in Hollywood''. In 1997, Kramer published his autobiography ''A Mad Mad Mad Mad World: A Life in Hollywood''.


He died on February 19, 2001, in ], aged 87, after contracting ]. He was married three times and divorced twice. He was survived by his third wife, actress ], and four children: Casey and Larry (with Anne Pearce), and Katharine and Jennifer (with Karen Sharpe).<ref>{{cite news|last1=Lyman|first1=Rick|title=Stanley Kramer, Filmmaker with Social Bent, Dies at 87|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/21/movies/stanley-kramer-filmmaker-with-social-bent-dies-at-87.html|access-date=5 May 2016|work=The New York Times|date=21 February 2001}}</ref> He died on February 19, 2001 in Woodland Hills, Los Angeles, aged 87, after contracting pneumonia. He was married three times and divorced twice. He was survived by his third wife, actress ], and four children: Casey and Larry (with Anne Pearce), and Katharine and Jennifer (with Karen Sharpe).<ref>{{cite news|last1=Lyman|first1=Rick|title=Stanley Kramer, Filmmaker with Social Bent, Dies at 87|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/21/movies/stanley-kramer-filmmaker-with-social-bent-dies-at-87.html|access-date=5 May 2016|work=The New York Times|date=21 February 2001}}</ref>


==Legacy== ==Legacy==
Kramer has been called "a genuine original" as a filmmaker. He made movies that he believed in, and "straddled the fence between art and commerce for more than 30 years."<ref>''501 Movie Directors'', Barrons Educational Series (2007) p. 210</ref> Most of his films were noted for engaging the audience with political and social issues of the time. When asked why he gravitated to those kinds of themes, he stated, "emotionally I am drawn to these subjects,"<ref name=NYTimes/> and thought that independent productions like his might help "return vitality to the motion picture industry. . . . If our industry is to flourish, we must break away from formula thinking."<ref name=NYTimes/> Kramer has been called "a genuine original" as a filmmaker. He made movies that he believed in, and "straddled the fence between art and commerce for more than 30 years."<ref>''501 Movie Directors'', Barrons Educational Series (2007) p. 210</ref> Most of his films were noted for engaging the audience with political and social issues of the time. When asked why he gravitated to those kinds of themes, he stated, "emotionally I am drawn to these subjects,"<ref name=NYTimes/> and thought that independent productions like his might help "return vitality to the motion picture industry...If our industry is to flourish, we must break away from formula thinking."<ref name=NYTimes/>


Film author Bill Nichols states that "Kramer's films continue a long-standing Hollywood tradition of marrying topical issues to dramatic form, a tradition in which we find many of Hollywood's more openly progressive films."<ref name=Hillstrom>Hillstrom, Laurie Collier (ed.) ''International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers'', vol 2, St. James Press (1997) pp. 548-550</ref> Among his themes, Kramer was one of the few filmmakers to delve into subjects relating to civil rights, and according to his wife, Karen Kramer, "put his reputation and finances on the line to present subject matter that meant something." He gave up his salary to make sure that ''Guess Who's Coming to Dinner'' would be completed.<ref>''Jet'', Aug. 18, 2008</ref> He has not though been universally admired. Film critic ] has written that Kramer's "films are middlebrow and overemphatic; at worst, they are among the most tedious and dispiriting productions the American cinema has to offer. Commercialism, of the most crass and confusing kind ... devitalised all his projects."<ref name="Thomson">David Thomson ''The New Biographical Dictionary of Film'', New York: Knopf; London: Little, Brown, 2002, p.477</ref> Film author Bill Nichols states that "Kramer's films continue a long-standing Hollywood tradition of marrying topical issues to dramatic form, a tradition in which we find many of Hollywood's more openly progressive films."<ref name=Hillstrom>Hillstrom, Laurie Collier (ed.) ''International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers'', vol 2, St. James Press (1997) pp. 548-550</ref> Among his themes, Kramer was one of the few filmmakers to delve into subjects relating to civil rights, and according to his wife, Karen Kramer, "put his reputation and finances on the line to present subject matter that meant something." He gave up his salary to make sure that ''Guess Who's Coming to Dinner'' was completed.<ref>''Jet'', Aug. 18, 2008</ref> However, he has not had universally acclaim. Film critic David Thomson has written that Kramer's "films are middlebrow and overemphatic; at worst, they are among the most tedious and dispiriting productions the American cinema has to offer. Commercialism, of the most crass and confusing kind...devitalised all his projects."<ref name="Thomson">David Thomson ''The New Biographical Dictionary of Film'', New York: Knopf; London: Little, Brown, 2002, p.477</ref>


Critics have often labeled Kramer's films as "message movies." Some, like ], were often critical of his subject matter for being "melodramas," and "irritatingly self-righteous," although she credits his films for their "redeeming social importance . . . situations and settings nevertheless excitingly modern, relevant."<ref name=Byman/>{{rp|44}} Kramer, however, saw himself as "a storyteller with a point of view": Critics have labeled Kramer's films as "message movies." Some, like ], were often critical of his subject matter for being "melodramas," and "irritatingly self-righteous," but she credits his films for their "redeeming social importance... situations and settings nevertheless excitingly modern, relevant."<ref name=Byman/>{{rp|44}} Kramer, however, saw himself as "a storyteller with a point of view":
{{quote|Maybe I'm out of step with the times, because a lot of movies are made today with no statement at all, just shock and sensation, or a motivationless kind of approach to a story, a senseless crime, a pointless love affair. . . . Like lots of kids in the 1930s, I wanted to right all the wrongs of mankind. . . . I'm not interested in changing anyone's opinion, just in telling a story.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|18}}}} {{quote|Maybe I'm out of step with the times, because a lot of movies are made today with no statement at all, just shock and sensation, or a motivationless kind of approach to a story, a senseless crime, a pointless love affair...Like lots of kids in the 1930s, I wanted to right all the wrongs of mankind...I'm not interested in changing anyone's opinion, just in telling a story.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|18}}}}


In the 1960s Kramer blamed the growing "youth culture" with having changed the "artistic landscape" as he remembered it from his own youth. "No longer," he said, "were writers or filmmakers interested in creating the Great American Novel or the great American film, or indeed with exploring what it meant to be American."<ref name=NYTimes/> In the 1960s Kramer blamed the growing "youth culture" with having changed the "artistic landscape" as he remembered it from his own youth. "No longer," he said, "were writers or filmmakers interested in creating the Great American Novel or the great American film, or indeed with exploring what it meant to be American."<ref name=NYTimes/>


In extreme cases, Kramer was accused of being "anti-American" due to the themes of his films, many concerning social problems or pathologies. But Kramer notes that it was his ability to produce those films in a democracy which distinguishes them: In extreme cases, Kramer was accused of being "anti-American" due to the themes of his films, many concerning social problems or pathologies. But Kramer notes that it was his ability to produce those films in a democracy which distinguishes them:
{{quote|Any American film that contains criticism of the American fabric of life is accepted, both critically and by the mass audience overseas, as being something that could never have been produced in a ]. This in itself builds tremendous respect for American society among foreigners—a respect I've always wanted to encourage.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|17}}}} {{quote|Any American film that contains criticism of the American fabric of life is accepted, both critically and by the mass audience overseas, as being something that could never have been produced in a totalitarian state. This in itself builds tremendous respect for American society among foreigners—a respect I've always wanted to encourage.<ref name=Spoto/>{{rp|17}}}}


Kramer produced and directed 23 different actors in Oscar-nominated performances, with ], ], ] and ] winning for their performances. Kramer's was among the first stars to be completed on the ] on March 28, 1960,<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100612050102/http://hollywoodchamber.net/index.php?page=10 |date=2010-06-12 }} ''hollywoodchamber.net''; Hollywood Chamber of Commerce. Retrieved 2010-05-31.</ref><ref>(abstract). ''Los Angeles Times'', March 29, 1960, p. 15. Full article: Retrieved 2010-06-12.</ref> out of the original 1,550 stars created and installed as a unit in 1960. Kramer produced and directed 23 different actors in Oscar-nominated performances, with ], ], ] and ] winning for their performances. Kramer's was among the first stars to be completed on the ] on March 28, 1960,<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100612050102/http://hollywoodchamber.net/index.php?page=10 |date=2010-06-12 }} ''hollywoodchamber.net''; Hollywood Chamber of Commerce. Retrieved 2010-05-31.</ref><ref>(abstract). ''Los Angeles Times'', March 29, 1960, p. 15. Full article: Retrieved 2010-06-12.</ref> out of the original 1,550 stars created and installed as a unit in 1960.


One of his daughters, Kat Kramer, is co-producer of socially-relevant documentaries, as part of her series, ''Films That Change The World''.<ref> IMDb</ref> One of his daughters, Kat Kramer, is co-producer of socially relevant documentaries, as part of her series ''Films That Change The World''.<ref> IMDb</ref>


===The Stanley Kramer Award=== ===The Stanley Kramer Award===
Line 187: Line 185:


===As producer only=== ===As producer only===
*'']'' (Associate producer, 1942) *'']'' (associate producer, 1942)
*'']'' (1948) *'']'' (1948)
*'']'' (1949) *'']'' (1949)
Line 223: Line 221:
|rowspan=3|] || ] || rowspan=2|'']'' || ] – '']'' |rowspan=3|] || ] || rowspan=2|'']'' || ] – '']''
|- |-
|] || ] and ] – '']'' |] || ] and Robert Wise – '']''
|- |-
|colspan=2 style="text-align:center;" | ] || {{won}} |colspan=2 style="text-align:center;" | ] || {{won}}
|- |-
|] || rowspan="2" | ] || '']'' || ] – '']'' |] || rowspan="2" | ] || '']'' || Robert Wise – '']''
|- |-
|rowspan=2|] || rowspan="2" |'']'' || ] – '']'' |rowspan=2|] || rowspan="2" |'']'' || ] – '']''
Line 240: Line 238:
==External links== ==External links==
{{commons}} {{commons}}
*{{YouTube|_QY_jVz8R78|"Tribute to Stanley Kramer"}} with ], ], ], ] and ] *{{YouTube|_QY_jVz8R78|"Tribute to Stanley Kramer"}}
* {{YouTube|874lHLTGHOs|"The Godfather of Independent Film"}}, video, 3.5 min. * {{YouTube|874lHLTGHOs|"The Godfather of Independent Film"}}, video, 3.5 min.
* {{IMDb name|6452}} * {{IMDb name|6452}}

Revision as of 19:46, 20 January 2023

American film director and producer
Stanley Kramer
Kramer in 1955
Born(1913-09-29)September 29, 1913
New York City, U.S.
DiedFebruary 19, 2001(2001-02-19) (aged 87)
Los Angeles, California, U.S.
Occupations
  • Director
  • producer
Years active1933–1997
Spouses
  • Marilyn Erskine ​ ​(m. 1945; ann. 1945)
  • Anne Pearce Kramer ​ ​(m. 1950; div. 1963)
  • Karen Sharpe
    ​ ​(m. 1966)
Children4

Stanley Earl Kramer (September 29, 1913 – February 19, 2001) was an American film director and producer, responsible for making many of Hollywood's most famous "message films" (he called his movies heavy dramas) and a liberal movie icon. As an independent producer and director, he brought attention to topical social issues that most studios avoided. Among the subjects covered in his films were racism (in The Defiant Ones and Guess Who's Coming to Dinner), nuclear war (in On the Beach), greed (in It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World), creationism vs. evolution (in Inherit the Wind), and the causes and effects of fascism (in Judgment at Nuremberg). His other films included High Noon (1952, as producer), The Caine Mutiny (1954, as producer), and Ship of Fools (1965).

Director Steven Spielberg described him as an "incredibly talented visionary",Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).

Despite uneven critical reception, both then and now, Kramer's body of work has received many awards, including 16 Academy Awards and 80 nominations, and he was nominated nine times as either producer or director. In 1961, he received the Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award. In 1963, he was a member of the jury at the 3rd Moscow International Film Festival. In 1998, he was awarded the first NAACP Vanguard Award in recognition of "the strong social themes that ran through his body of work". In 2002, the Stanley Kramer Award was created, to be awarded to recipients whose work "dramatically illustrates provocative social issues".

Early life

Kramer was born in New York City. His parents were Jewish, and having separated when he was very young, he remembered little about his father. His mother worked at a New York office of Paramount Pictures, during which time his grandparents took care of him at home. His uncle, Earl Kramer, worked in distribution at Universal Pictures.

Kramer attended DeWitt Clinton High School in the Bronx, where he graduated at age fifteen. He then enrolled in New York University, where he became a member of the Pi Lambda Phi fraternity and wrote a weekly column for the Medley newspaper. He graduated in 1933 at the age of nineteen with a degree in business administration. After developing a "zest for writing" with a newspaper, biographer Donald Spoto wrote, Kramer was offered a paid internship in the writing department of 20th Century Fox and moved to Hollywood. Until receiving that writing job, he had planned to enroll in law school.

Film career

Move to Hollywood

Over the following years, during the period of the Great Depression, Kramer took odd jobs in the film industry: He worked as a set furniture mover and film cutter at MGM, as writer and researcher for Columbia Pictures and Republic Pictures, and associate producer with Loew-Lewin productions. Those years as an apprentice writer and editor helped him acquire an "exceptional aptitude" in editing and develop the ability to understand the overall structure of the films he worked on. They enabled him to later compose and edit "in camera," as he shot scenes.

He was drafted into the Army in 1943, during World War II, where he helped make training films with the Signal Corps in New York, along with other Hollywood filmmakers including Frank Capra and Anatole Litvak. He left the army with the rank of first lieutenant.

After the war, Kramer soon discovered that there were no available jobs in Hollywood in 1947, so he created an independent production company, Screen Plays Inc. He partnered with writer Herbie Baker, publicist George Glass and producer Carl Foreman, an army friend from the film unit. Foreman justified the production company by noting that the big studios had become "dinosaurs," which, being shocked by the onrush of television, "jettisoned virtually everything to survive." But they failed to develop cadres of younger creative talent in their wake.

Producer

Kramer's new company was able to take advantage of unused production facilities by renting time, allowing him to create independent films for a fraction of the cost the larger studios had required, and he did so without studio control. Kramer also saw this as an opportunity to produce films dealing with subjects the studios previously avoided, especially those about controversial topics.

However, Kramer soon learned that financing such independent films was a major obstacle, as he was forced to approach banks or else take on private investors. He did both when necessary. But with studios no longer involved, rival independent companies were created which all competed for those limited funds. According to Byman, "there were no fewer than ninety-six" other companies in competition during that period, and included some of Hollywood's biggest names: Frank Capra, John Ford, William Wyler, Howard Hawks, Leo McCarey, and George Stevens. Kramer explained how he tried to differentiate his new company from the others, explaining he was less interested in the money than having the ability to make a statement through his films:

Instead of relying on star names, we pinned our faith in stories that had something to say. If it happened to be something that other movies hadn't said before, so much the better. The only basis of choice was personal taste.

The first movie produced under his production company was the comedy So This Is New York (1948), directed by Richard Fleischer, and based on Ring Lardner's The Big Town. It failed at the box office. It was followed with Champion (1949), another Lardner story, this one about an ambitious and unscrupulous boxer. Written by Foreman, it was tailored to the talents of Kirk Douglas, a former amateur wrestler who was now an actor. Filmed in only 23 days with a relatively small budget, it became an immense box-office success. It won an Academy Award for Best Editing, with four other nominations, including Douglas for best actor and Foreman as screenwriter.

Kramer next produced Home of the Brave (also 1949), again directed by Mark Robson, which became an even bigger success than Champion. The story was adapted from a play by Arthur Laurents, originally about anti-Semitism in the army, but revised and made into a film about the persecution of a black soldier. Byman notes that it was the "first sound film about antiblack racism." The subject matter was so sensitive at the time, that Kramer shot the film in "total secrecy" to avoid protests by various organizations. Critics generally liked the film, which, notes Nora Sayre, "had a flavoring of courage."

His renamed Stanley Kramer Company produced The Men (1950), which featured Marlon Brando's screen debut, in a drama about paraplegic war veterans. It was the first time Kramer and Foreman worked with director Fred Zinnemann, who had been directing for twenty years and had won an Oscar. The film was another success for Kramer, who took on a unique subject dealing with a world few knew about. Critic Bosley Crowther noted that its "striking and authentic documentary quality has been imported to the whole film in every detail, attitude and word."

Zinnemann said he was impressed with Kramer's company and the efficiency of their productions:

They struck me as being enormously efficient. Kramer was very inventive in finding quite unlikely sources of finance...This method of outside financing...was truly original and far ahead of its time...There were no luxurious offices, no major-studio bureaucracy, no small internal empires to be dealt with, no waste of time or effort...I was enthusiastic about this independent setup and the energy it created.

Also released in 1950 was Kramer's production of Cyrano de Bergerac, the first English language film version of Edmond Rostand's 1897 French play. It made a star of José Ferrer, who won his only Oscar for Best Actor.

Films with Columbia Pictures

In 1951, Columbia Pictures president Harry Cohn offered Kramer's company an opportunity to form a production unit working with his studio. Kramer was given free rein over what films he chose to make, along with a budget of nearly a million dollars each. Kramer agreed to a five-year contract during which time he would produce 20 films. However, Kramer later stated that the agreement was "one of the most dangerous and foolhardy moves of my entire career." He agreed to the commitment because of his "deep-seated desire to direct," he states, along with the security of ready studio financing.

His last independent production was High Noon (1952), a Western drama directed by Fred Zinnemann. The movie was well received, winning four Oscars, as well as three other nominations. Unfortunately, High Noon's production and release intersected with McCarthyism. Writer, producer and partner Carl Foreman was called before the House Un-American Activities Committee while he was writing the film. Foreman had been a member of the Communist Party ten years earlier, but declined to "name names" and was branded an "un-cooperative witness" by HUAC, and then blacklisted by the Hollywood companies, after which he sold his interest in the company. Kramer, a long time friend and business partner of Carl Foreman removed Foreman's name from the credits as co-producer.

Kramer continued producing movies at Columbia, including Death of a Salesman (1951), The Sniper (1952), The Member of the Wedding (1952), The Juggler (1953), The Wild One (1953) and The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T (1953). With a larger budget, his films took on a "glossier" more polished look, yet his next 10 films all lost money, although some were nonetheless highly praised.

In 1953, Cohn and Kramer agreed to terminate the five-year, 20-film contract Kramer had signed. However, his last Columbia film, The Caine Mutiny (1954), regained all of the losses Columbia had incurred as a result of his earlier projects. The Caine Mutiny was an adaptation of the book written by Herman Wouk and was directed by Edward Dmytryk.

Kramer observed that during the 1940s and 1950s, "cinema was the producer's medium:"

It was the day of Selznick and Thalberg and Goldwyn. They were the powers incarnate because the producer was boss.

Director

Stanley Kramer receives an award at the 1960 Berlin Film Festival for Inherit the Wind.

After The Caine Mutiny, Kramer left Columbia and resumed his independent productions, this time in the role of the director. Over the next two decades, Kramer reestablished his reputation within the film industry by directing a continual series of often successful films dealing with social and controversial issues, such as racism, nuclear war, greed and the causes and effects of fascism. Critic Charles Champlin later described Kramer as "a guy who fought some hard battles. He took on social issues when it was not popular to do so in Hollywood."

Among some of those controversial films were Not as a Stranger (1955), The Pride and the Passion (1957), The Defiant Ones (1958), On the Beach (1959), Inherit the Wind (1960), Judgment at Nuremberg (1961), and Guess Who's Coming to Dinner (1967). In addition to dramas, he directed It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (1963).

His first film as director was Not as a Stranger (1955), the story of medical students and their career, some of whom lose their idealism and succumb to blind ambition, adultery, and immoral behavior. The film was a "smash hit," but reviews were mixed. Pauline Kael claimed it "lacked rhythm and development."

The Pride and the Passion (1957)

The Pride and the Passion (1957) is an adaptation from The Gun, a novel by C. S. Forester. It portrays in detail how a dedicated group of Spanish guerrillas dragged a gigantic cannon across half the country in an effort to defeat Napoleon's advancing army. It stars Frank Sinatra, Cary Grant and Sophia Loren.

The Defiant Ones (1958)

The following year, Kramer directed The Defiant Ones (1958), the story of two escaped convicts in the Deep South, one black, played by Sidney Poitier, and one white, Tony Curtis. To add to the intensity of the drama, both men are shackled together with chains, forcing them, despite their wishes, into a sense of brotherhood, suffering and fear.

New York Times film critic Bosley Crowther lauded the production and the acting in the film, calling it "a remarkably apt and dramatic visualization of a social idea—the idea of men of different races brought together to face misfortune in a bond of brotherhood — is achieved by producer Stanley Kramer in his new film." It was nominated for eight Academy Awards, winning two.

Five years after the film was released, producer George Stevens Jr. helped organize a showing of this, along with other Kramer films, at the Moscow Film Festival, which Kramer and co-star Sidney Poitier attended. Stevens writes that the showings of his films, especially The Defiant Ones, were a "great success in Moscow." He remembers that "filmmakers applauded his films, often chanting Kraaaamer, Kraaaaamer, Kraaaaamer," at their conclusion. Kramer spoke to the audience after each film, "making a fine impression for his country." Stevens credits The Defiant Ones for having the most impact, however:

The screening was one of the most emotional I have experienced. After the film, the crowd stood—many with tears in their eyes—and gave Poitier and Kramer an ovation that subsided only when we had left the auditorium. Stanley's visit to Moscow marked the high point in the cultural exchange between the two countries during those long years of estrangement.

On the Beach (1959)

With On the Beach (1959), Kramer tried to tackle the sensitive subject of nuclear war. The film takes place after World War III has annihilated most of the Northern hemisphere, with radioactive dust on a trajectory towards Australia. Kramer gave the film an "effective and eerie" documentary look at depopulated cities. It starred Gregory Peck, Ava Gardner, Fred Astaire and Anthony Perkins.

Reviews were mostly positive, not just from critics but from scientists. Linus Pauling, winner of two Nobel Prizes (Chemistry and Peace), commented:

It may be that some years from now we can look back and say that On the Beach is the movie that saved the world."

Critics Arthur Knight and Hollis Alpert likewise praised the film and admired Kramer for showing "courage in attempting such a theme."

Inherit the Wind (1960)

Inherit the Wind (1960) became Kramer's next challenging film, this one taking on the highly charged subjects of creationism and evolution, and how they are taught in school. The film, an adaptation of the play of the same name, written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert Edwin Lee, was a fictionalized account of the 1925 Scopes Trial, which concerned a violation of Tennessee's Butler Act. This law had made it unlawful to teach human evolution in any state-funded school in Tennessee. It starred Spencer Tracy, portraying the real Clarence Darrow, defending the teacher, and Fredric March as his rival attorney, William Jennings Bryan, who insisted that creationism was the only valid subject that should be taught to children. It was nominated for four Academy Awards.

For Tracy, who was nominated as Best Actor, the film became the first of four films he did for Kramer. "Everybody tells me how good I am," he said, "but only Stanley gives me work." The film received "extravagant reviews," yet failed at the box office due to its poor distribution and advertising. In addition, fundamentalist groups labeled the film "anti-God" and called Kramer "anti-Christ." Kramer, however, explains that these groups failed to understand the real theme of the film and the actual court trial it portrayed:

The spirit of the trial lives on, because the real issues of that trial were man's right to think and man's right to teach...the real theme of Inherit the Wind.

Kramer also notes that the film was the third part of a "trilogy of what have been called by some 'controversial pictures,'" of which the first two were The Defiant Ones and On the Beach. "I have attempted, and I hope succeeded in, making pictures that command attention," said Kramer.

Judgment at Nuremberg (1961)

File:Still - Stanley Kramer.jpg
Kramer directing

Like his previous film, Judgment at Nuremberg (1961) was a fictionalized account of a real trial, this one about the Nuremberg Trials held after the defeat of the Nazis in World War II. It also starred Spencer Tracy as the leading judge, along with numerous other stars. Richard Widmark played the American military prosecutor, and Maximilian Schell palyed the defense attorney. The film was nominated for 11 Academy Awards and won two: Schell as Best Actor and Abby Mann for Best Screenplay. Reviews were extremely positive. Critic Hollis Alpert wrote in his review:

Stanley Kramer has once again used film importantly and continues to emerge as the only truly responsible moviemaker in Hollywood."

Similarly, Arthur Knight credited Kramer for the film's significance: "From first to last, the director is in command of his material. ...he has not only added hugely to his stature as a producer-director, but to the stature of the American film as well."

However, despite mostly rave reviews in the U.S. and many countries in Europe, biographer Spoto notes that during its various premieres overseas, "it shocked many, angered some, disgusted others. But it bored no one." Kramer described its world premiere, in Berlin, as "the most frightening evening in my life." It was attended by hundreds of dignitaries from throughout Germany.

Willy Brandt stood up and warned the audience that they might not find the film pleasant, but that if Berlin was ever to regard itself as a capital city, then this film should be shown there because it was about all of them. "We may like or dislike or disagree with many things," he said, "but here it is."

Well, the film went on, and when it was over there was a deafening silence...The film was totally rejected: it never did three cents' business in Germany. It played so many empty houses it just stopped.

William Shatner, who had a supporting role, recalls that prior to filming, Kramer and screenwriter Abby Mann required that everyone involved in the production, actors and crew alike, watch some films taken by American soldiers at the liberation of the concentration camps. "They wanted us to understand what this film was about":

These films had not yet been released to the public; very few people had seen them. We didn't know what to expect...We watched scenes of bulldozers shoving piles of bodies into mass graves. We saw survivors, their eyes bulging, their bones practically protruding from their bodies. We saw the crematoriums and the piles of shoes. People gasped in shock, others started crying. Certainly it was the most horrifying thing I had ever seen in my life...But from that night on we understood the importance of the film we were making.

It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (1963)

After the seriousness of his previous films, Kramer "felt compelled to answer" for the "lack of lightness" in his earlier films, writes Spoto. As a result, he directed It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (1963), a film with a "gifted, wacky crew of comedians." Kramer describes it as a "comedy about greed." According to one writer, he directed it "to prove he could also handle comedy" and hired many of the leading comedic actors of the previous decades, from silent star Buster Keaton to emerging talent Jonathan Winters. Winters later wrote that "Kramer was a man who took chances—as they say, he worked without a net."

It played to mixed reviews with some criticizing its excessive comedy with too many comedians thereby losing its focus. Nonetheless, it was Kramer's biggest box office hit, and the public enjoyed its "socially disruptive and goofy" story and acting. Film critic Dwight Macdonald writes that its "small army of actors—105 speaking roles—inflict mayhem on each other with cars, planes, explosives and other devices...is simply too much for the human eye and ear to respond to, let alone the funny bone," calling it "hard-core slapstick." It was nominated for six Academy Awards, winning for Best Sound Editing.

Ship of Fools (1965)

Ship of Fools (1965) has been described as a "floating Grand Hotel," an earlier film which also had an all-star cast. Its multi-strand narrative deals with the failing personal relationships among the passengers on board a passenger liner returning to Germany in 1933, during the rise of Nazism. Spoto describes its theme as one of "conscious social and psychological significance." It won two Academy Awards and was nominated for six others.

Some writers describe the film as a "microcosm" displaying a "weakness of the world that permitted the rise of Hitler." Kramer does not disagree, and wrote, "Even though we never mention him in the picture, his ascendancy is an ever-present factor. Most of the passengers on the ship are Germans, returning to their fatherland at a time when millions of other Germans are looking for ways to escape." In a scene noted by Spoto, a Nazi passenger is "barking inanities" about how Germans should purify their race, to which a German-Jewish passenger responds, "There are nearly a million Jews in Germany. What are they going to do — kill us all?"

Guess Who's Coming to Dinner (1967)

For his fourth film about the sensitive subject of anti-racism, he both directed and produced Guess Who's Coming to Dinner (1967), a groundbreaking story about interracial marriage. It starred Spencer Tracy, Sidney Poitier, and Katharine Hepburn, winning two Academy Awards with eight nominations. It has been listed in the top 100 films over the last 100 years by the American Film Institute. However, despite its popularity with the public and its box-office success, many critics gave it negative reviews.

For Kramer and others involved in the production, it "was one of the most important events of their lives," writes Spoto. Partly because it was the first film that touched the subject since the 1920s silent era. "No one would touch this most explosive of social issues" until Kramer took on the challenge. Co-star Sidney Poitier called the film "revolutionary," and stated why:

No producer, no director could get the money, nor would theaters in America book it. But Kramer made people look at the issue for the first time...He treated the theme with humor, but so delicately, so humanly, so lovingly that he made everyone look at the question for the very first time in film history!

The film was also important as it was the last film role for Spencer Tracy, who was aware while making the film that he was dying and did in fact die a few weeks after its completion. It was his fourth film directed by Kramer and his ninth with Hepburn, who was so shaken by Tracy's death, that she refused to watch the film after it was completed. Kramer called Tracy "the greatest actor I ever worked with."

As a result of this film's commercial success, Kramer helped spur on Hollywood to reform its film marketing practices when it was observed that the film was doing excellent business everywhere in the U.S., including the Southern states where it was assumed that films with African American lead actors never would be accepted. As a result, the prominent presence of Black actors in films never again was considered a factor in Hollywood film marketing and distribution. However, Kramer, bothered by the film's negative reviews and wanting respect as an important film artist like François Truffaut and Jean-Luc Godard, undertook a nine-college speaking tour to screen the film and discuss racial integration. The effort proved a dispiriting embarrassment for him with college students largely dismissing his film and preferring to discuss less conventional fare like Bonnie and Clyde directed by Arthur Penn.

The film was Kramer's last major success, and his subsequent films were not profitable, and many had mixed reviews. Among those films were The Secret of Santa Vittoria (1968), R.P.M. (1970), Bless the Beasts and Children (1971), Oklahoma Crude (1973), The Domino Principle (1977), and The Runner Stumbles (1979). Oklahoma Crude was entered into the 8th Moscow International Film Festival where Kramer won the Golden Prize for Direction. At the time of his retirement, he was attempting to bring a script titled Three Solitary Drinkers to the screen, a film about a trio of alcoholics that he hoped would be played by Sidney Poitier, Jack Lemmon, and Walter Matthau.

Retirement and death

In the 1980s, Kramer retired to Bellevue, Washington and wrote a column on movies for The Seattle Times from 1980 to 1996. During this time, he hosted his own weekly movie show on then-independent television station KCPQ.

In 1986, he signed an agreement with Columbia Pictures to produce or direct two films, Chernobyl and Beirut, but the deal fell through when David Puttnam left Columbia. Three years later, he agreed to make ERN starring Robert Guillaume but the project stalled. In 1991, he signed a deal with Trimark to direct and produce Bubble Man, a project he had been working on since 1972, but it was not made.

In 1997, Kramer published his autobiography A Mad Mad Mad Mad World: A Life in Hollywood.

He died on February 19, 2001 in Woodland Hills, Los Angeles, aged 87, after contracting pneumonia. He was married three times and divorced twice. He was survived by his third wife, actress Karen Sharpe, and four children: Casey and Larry (with Anne Pearce), and Katharine and Jennifer (with Karen Sharpe).

Legacy

Kramer has been called "a genuine original" as a filmmaker. He made movies that he believed in, and "straddled the fence between art and commerce for more than 30 years." Most of his films were noted for engaging the audience with political and social issues of the time. When asked why he gravitated to those kinds of themes, he stated, "emotionally I am drawn to these subjects," and thought that independent productions like his might help "return vitality to the motion picture industry...If our industry is to flourish, we must break away from formula thinking."

Film author Bill Nichols states that "Kramer's films continue a long-standing Hollywood tradition of marrying topical issues to dramatic form, a tradition in which we find many of Hollywood's more openly progressive films." Among his themes, Kramer was one of the few filmmakers to delve into subjects relating to civil rights, and according to his wife, Karen Kramer, "put his reputation and finances on the line to present subject matter that meant something." He gave up his salary to make sure that Guess Who's Coming to Dinner was completed. However, he has not had universally acclaim. Film critic David Thomson has written that Kramer's "films are middlebrow and overemphatic; at worst, they are among the most tedious and dispiriting productions the American cinema has to offer. Commercialism, of the most crass and confusing kind...devitalised all his projects."

Critics have labeled Kramer's films as "message movies." Some, like Pauline Kael, were often critical of his subject matter for being "melodramas," and "irritatingly self-righteous," but she credits his films for their "redeeming social importance... situations and settings nevertheless excitingly modern, relevant." Kramer, however, saw himself as "a storyteller with a point of view":

Maybe I'm out of step with the times, because a lot of movies are made today with no statement at all, just shock and sensation, or a motivationless kind of approach to a story, a senseless crime, a pointless love affair...Like lots of kids in the 1930s, I wanted to right all the wrongs of mankind...I'm not interested in changing anyone's opinion, just in telling a story.

In the 1960s Kramer blamed the growing "youth culture" with having changed the "artistic landscape" as he remembered it from his own youth. "No longer," he said, "were writers or filmmakers interested in creating the Great American Novel or the great American film, or indeed with exploring what it meant to be American."

In extreme cases, Kramer was accused of being "anti-American" due to the themes of his films, many concerning social problems or pathologies. But Kramer notes that it was his ability to produce those films in a democracy which distinguishes them:

Any American film that contains criticism of the American fabric of life is accepted, both critically and by the mass audience overseas, as being something that could never have been produced in a totalitarian state. This in itself builds tremendous respect for American society among foreigners—a respect I've always wanted to encourage.

Kramer produced and directed 23 different actors in Oscar-nominated performances, with José Ferrer, Gary Cooper, Maximilian Schell and Katharine Hepburn winning for their performances. Kramer's was among the first stars to be completed on the Hollywood Walk of Fame on March 28, 1960, out of the original 1,550 stars created and installed as a unit in 1960.

One of his daughters, Kat Kramer, is co-producer of socially relevant documentaries, as part of her series Films That Change The World.

The Stanley Kramer Award

The Producers Guild of America established the Stanley Kramer Award in 2002 to honor a production or individuals whose contribution illuminates and raises public awareness of important social issues.

Filmography

As producer and director

As producer only

Academy Award Nominations

Year Award Film Resulting Win
1952 Best Picture High Noon Cecil B. DeMilleThe Greatest Show on Earth
1954 The Caine Mutiny Sam SpiegelOn the Waterfront
1958 The Defiant Ones Arthur FreedGigi
Best Director Vincente MinnelliGigi
1961 Best Picture Judgment at Nuremberg Robert WiseWest Side Story
Best Director Jerome Robbins and Robert Wise – West Side Story
Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award Won
1965 Best Picture Ship of Fools Robert Wise – The Sound of Music
1967 Guess Who's Coming to Dinner Walter MirischIn the Heat of the Night
Best Director Mike NicholsThe Graduate

References

  1. Film-maker Stanley Kramer dies, a February 2001 BBC obituary
  2. "Kevin Spacey drops F-bomb during Golden Globes speech", NY Daily News, Jan. 12, 2015
  3. ^ Byman, Jeremy. Showdown at High Noon: Witch-hunts, Critics, and the End of the Western, Scarecrow Press (2004) pp. 9, 29-45; 73-76; Ch. 5
  4. "3rd Moscow International Film Festival (1963)". MIFF. Archived from the original on 2013-01-16. Retrieved 2012-11-25.
  5. Cite error: The named reference tribute was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  6. ^ Kramer, Stanley. A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World: a Life in Hollywood, Harcourt Brace (1997)
  7. ^ Spoto, Donald. Stanley Kramer: Film Maker, Putnam (1978)
  8. Membership Directory, 2010, Pi Lambda Phi Inc.
  9. ^ Lyman, Rick. "Stanley Kramer, Filmmaker With Social Bent, Dies at 87", New York Times February 21, 2001
  10. ^ Wakeman, John. Ed. World Film Directors: Volume II, 1945-1985, H. W. Wilson Company, N.Y. (1988) pp. 538-544
  11. ^ Dutka, Elaine. "Stanley Kramer; Acclaimed Movies Focused on Social Issues", Los Angeles Times, Feb. 20, 2001
  12. Katz, Ephraim. The Macmillan International Film Encyclopedia, Macmillan (1998) p.767
  13. Kirk Douglas, I am Spartacus! Making a film, breaking the Blacklist, Open Road Integrated Media, New York, 2012 pp.19
  14. ^ Stevens, George Jr. Conversations with the Great Moviemakers of Hollywood's Golden Age, Alfred A. Knopf (2006) pp. 558-584
  15. Crowther, Bosley. The New York Times, film review, September 25, 1958
  16. "Awards for Inherit the Wind" IMDb
  17. "Awards for Judgment at Nuremberg IMDb
  18. Shatner, William. Up Till Now: The Autobiography, Macmillan (2008) p. 76
  19. "Awards for It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World IMDb
  20. Awards for Ship of Fools, IMDb
  21. ^ Harris, Mark (2008). Pictures at a Revolution: Five Movies and the Birth of the New Hollywood. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-0143115038.
  22. "8th Moscow International Film Festival (1973)". MIFF. Archived from the original on 2013-01-16. Retrieved 2013-01-03.
  23. Cedar Rapids Gazette, September 19, 1979
  24. "Director Stanley Kramer dies". The Seattle Times. February 20, 2001.
  25. "Kramer At Work At 'Chernboyl', 1st Film In Col Pact". Variety. 1987-05-20. pp. 4, 38.
  26. "Kramer's 'Bubble Man' nears fruition". Variety. October 7, 1991. p. 20.
  27. Lyman, Rick (21 February 2001). "Stanley Kramer, Filmmaker with Social Bent, Dies at 87". The New York Times. Retrieved 5 May 2016.
  28. 501 Movie Directors, Barrons Educational Series (2007) p. 210
  29. Hillstrom, Laurie Collier (ed.) International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers, vol 2, St. James Press (1997) pp. 548-550
  30. Jet, Aug. 18, 2008
  31. David Thomson The New Biographical Dictionary of Film, New York: Knopf; London: Little, Brown, 2002, p.477
  32. History of WOF Archived 2010-06-12 at the Wayback Machine hollywoodchamber.net; Hollywood Chamber of Commerce. Retrieved 2010-05-31.
  33. "Kramer First Name Put in Walk of Fame"(abstract). Los Angeles Times, March 29, 1960, p. 15. Full article: Los Angeles Times Archives Retrieved 2010-06-12.
  34. Kat Kramer IMDb
  35. "PGA honors Loving". Archived from the original on 2017-12-01.

External links

Films directed by Stanley Kramer
Awards for Stanley Kramer
David O. Selznick Achievement Award
Golden Globe Award for Best Director
1943–1975
1976–2000
2001–present
Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award
New York Film Critics Circle Award for Best Director
1935–1950
1951–1975
1976–2000
2001–present
Categories: