Revision as of 11:41, 20 February 2023 editTewdar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,561 editsNo edit summaryTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:45, 20 February 2023 edit undoTewdar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,561 editsNo edit summaryTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile editNext edit → | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
! Reason | ! Reason | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Newimpartial | |||
|Example | |||
|Provocative behaviour | |||
|none | |||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 11:45, 20 February 2023
Archives | |
|
|
BANNED USERS LIST
the following users are permabanned from this talk page, with the standard policy exceptions i.e. don't post here unless you're taking me to AN/I or whatever
User | Reason |
---|---|
Newimpartial | Provocative behaviour |
Do NOT post 'contentious topics' (formerly 'discretionary sanctions') alerts on this page! I've read 'em all, even the ones that aren't on the list, even the ones that haven't been authorized yet by WP:SOVARBCOM or whatever they're called! 😁👍
Do NOT post generic templated messages on this page! I won't read 'em anyway, and even if I did, I probably wouldn't give a ha'penny fuck about whatever it is you're complaining about! 😁👍
This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Archives
IE
I hate Google. They have it even when we can't get it yet from CUP ☹ Austronesier (talk) 20:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- I'm having an anthropomorphic stele like the one on the front cover put on top of my pit-grave, unless my loved-ones decide to spend the money on something less extravagant. I expect it'll be 3 inches high and made of Fimo. Tewdar 20:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- I'm looking forward to the embargo on this ending, too. Tewdar 20:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Have you tried WP:RX for the thesis? Austronesier (talk) 21:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- No, I only just found out about RX from you just then 😁. Maybe I'll give it a try if you think it's worth a shot. Tewdar 22:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- RX is always worth a shot. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- No, I only just found out about RX from you just then 😁. Maybe I'll give it a try if you think it's worth a shot. Tewdar 22:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Have you tried WP:RX for the thesis? Austronesier (talk) 21:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
30 page watchers?
That's probably the total number of people I've ever interacted with here. Must be an exciting talk page! 😁 Tewdar 14:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Brittonic language in Galicia
Hello Tewdar. I would like to know your sources about any remnant of a Brittonic language in Galicia because there are not and the only bishop having a Celtic name is Mailloc. Regards. Nortmannus (talk) 10:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- For a start, your addition is quite the COATRACK, having marginal relevance to the article. The cited source in the Britonia article, Young, Simon (2001). "Note on Britones in Thirteenth-century Galicia". Studia Celtica. XXXV, states that there is the
meanest proof of its existence, a handful of short notices and a single place name: Bretoña (in the Galician province of Lugo)...At least two other place names seem to recall the colony: Bretonia, a hamlet, also in the province of Lugo; and Bretoña, a hamlet in the parish of Currio in the Galician province of Ponte Vedra
, and also cites a 1233 charter from Lugo which states that the word britones found therein islikely connected to the ancient British colony.
So there is evidence, but not much. Again, putting this debate on a map of the consensus view of Brittonic 6th century settlements is not a good idea... Tewdar 11:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Take this to the article talk page instead of reverting, please. Tewdar 11:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)