| Revision as of 07:36, 2 February 2023 editBaabjitvk (talk | contribs)33 edits →Wrong information: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:27, 10 March 2023 edit undo117.201.115.37 (talk) →Sockfarm: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| Dear | Dear | ||
| False information is given int the wikipedia in the "viswakarma caste" article. Before publishing some information on the powerful social media such as wikipedia, you have to go through a thorough research, especially when the content spoils the respect of a clan. You go through the vedas for konwing the brahminical status of the viswakarmas. By reading few useless puranas, it is irony to decide the viswakarmas have no relation with brahmins. It seems the article is written either inadvertently or with jealous. You have no right to discriminate a brahminical caste. Viswakarmas won around 22 cases in various levels of courts officially, proving that they are the brahmins. If you dont know.. first of all know it. otherwise dont write an article with just half knowledge. ] (]) 07:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC) | False information is given int the wikipedia in the "viswakarma caste" article. Before publishing some information on the powerful social media such as wikipedia, you have to go through a thorough research, especially when the content spoils the respect of a clan. You go through the vedas for konwing the brahminical status of the viswakarmas. By reading few useless puranas, it is irony to decide the viswakarmas have no relation with brahmins. It seems the article is written either inadvertently or with jealous. You have no right to discriminate a brahminical caste. Viswakarmas won around 22 cases in various levels of courts officially, proving that they are the brahmins. If you dont know.. first of all know it. otherwise dont write an article with just half knowledge. ] (]) 07:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
| == Sockfarm == | |||
| Hi, it is regarding by the banned sockfarm , username, editing area, et al. I believe their edit needs to get ]ED and new SPI case be filed. Please do the needful, thanks. - ] (]) 09:27, 10 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:27, 10 March 2023
 | An editor thinks something might be wrong with this page. They can't be arsed to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Caste promotion account
Hello, please look at this user he is editing majority particular caste related articles and is heavily using doubtful references. He is Rajput promoting account only. Check his contributions.
War article without any authentic source
Please once see this Battle of Mandan page. Not a single source looks credible. 2 out of 3 the sources are even low rated on Google books and one is by a caste historian.
References
1) Hooja, Rima (2006). A History of Rajasthan. Rupa and company.
2) Sinh, Ranbir (2001). History of Shekhawats. p. 280.
3) Meharda, B.L. Territory, Polity, and Status- A Study of Shekhawats.
Here 1st source is from some Rupa company, other 2 are from caste writers not credible historians.
This whole article is a propoganda against reality. Please User:Sitush check it.
Happy New Year, Sitush!
Sitush,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
— Moops 20:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops 20:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
khandayat caste
Hello, A user named P.sitansu doing propaganda edits on khandayat article. He intentionally trying to relate khandayat caste with gouda by misusing a book . I am from odisha and I studies many books and articles like tribe and caste of odisha and Bengal by HH risely, Hindu caste and sect by j bhattacharya, Madox settlement report, Cuttack Gazetteer by IAS Tara Dutta, God,People and caste system by LK Mohapatra, Generology of paika rebellion by akio tanabe, Peasant militias of odisha by Prasant Pradhan and many more. All the source says the same. Khandayat caste has relation with chasa caste. That's why khandayat are cultivator. But no source says gouda has any connection with khandayat. The fact is Khandayat and chasa are same caste. He misused a book of hc das which is a translation of a odia dictionary. I think he is a gouda by caste and intentionally doing this. Pls do something against this vandalism. Sekharblack123 (talk) 15:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Rowther
Would you please take a moment to look at recent changes. I am suffering from twitching antennae, the more so with the rather aggressive edit summary from a new editor, whom I have warned with an only warning about article ownership. My challenge in this area is that I find telling good edits from bad edits to be hard. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Faddle 🇺🇦 08:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Wrong information
Dear False information is given int the wikipedia in the "viswakarma caste" article. Before publishing some information on the powerful social media such as wikipedia, you have to go through a thorough research, especially when the content spoils the respect of a clan. You go through the vedas for konwing the brahminical status of the viswakarmas. By reading few useless puranas, it is irony to decide the viswakarmas have no relation with brahmins. It seems the article is written either inadvertently or with jealous. You have no right to discriminate a brahminical caste. Viswakarmas won around 22 cases in various levels of courts officially, proving that they are the brahmins. If you dont know.. first of all know it. otherwise dont write an article with just half knowledge. Baabjitvk (talk) 07:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Sockfarm
Hi, it is regarding this edit by the banned sockfarm , username, editing area, et al. I believe their edit needs to get WP:BANREVERTED and new SPI case be filed. Please do the needful, thanks. - 117.201.115.37 (talk) 09:27, 10 March 2023 (UTC)