Misplaced Pages

Ghurid dynasty: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:12, 10 March 2023 view sourceKamal Afghan01 (talk | contribs)198 edits I just added the missing references of the page regards the ghurid afghan origin. I also provided the references for the founder of ghurid empire.Tags: Reverted Visual edit← Previous edit Revision as of 18:17, 10 March 2023 view source Paramandyr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers50,054 edits restored referenced information, removed without discussion or consensus, take your concerns to the talk page and get consensusTag: UndoNext edit →
Line 70: Line 70:
| common_languages = ] <small>(court, literature)</small><ref>''The Development of Persian Culture under the Early Ghaznavids'', C.E. Bosworth, '''Iran''', Vol. 6, (1968), 35;;"Like the Ghaznavids whom they supplanted, the Ghurids had their court poets, and these wrote in '''Persian'''"</ref>{{sfn|O'Neal|2015}} | common_languages = ] <small>(court, literature)</small><ref>''The Development of Persian Culture under the Early Ghaznavids'', C.E. Bosworth, '''Iran''', Vol. 6, (1968), 35;;"Like the Ghaznavids whom they supplanted, the Ghurids had their court poets, and these wrote in '''Persian'''"</ref>{{sfn|O'Neal|2015}}
}} }}
The '''Ghurid dynasty''' (also spelled '''Ghorids'''; {{lang-fa|دودمان غوریان|translit=Dudmân-e Ğurīyân}}; self-designation: {{lang|fa|شنسبانی}}, ''Šansabānī'') was a ] Dynasty<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Michelsen |first=Leslee |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=n2f1R789EIMC&pg=PA100&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwil1PC47NH9AhU_wAIHHcqYDFIQ6AF6BAgDEAI#v=onepage&q=ghuri%20afghan&f=false |title=Ferozkoh: Tradition and Continuity in Afghan Art (English Edition) |date=2013-09-05 |publisher=A&C Black |isbn=978-99921-95-98-7 |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last=Marohomsalic |first=Nasser A. |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=s3ZwAAAAMAAJ&q=ghuri+afghan&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwil1PC47NH9AhU_wAIHHcqYDFIQ6AF6BAgJEAI |title=Aristocrats of the Malay Race: A History of the Bangsa Moro in the Philippines |date=2001 |publisher=N.A. Marohomsalic |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite book |last=Middleton |first=John |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=R63ACQAAQBAJ&pg=PA340&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwil1PC47NH9AhU_wAIHHcqYDFIQ6AF6BAgGEAI#v=onepage&q=ghuri%20afghan&f=false |title=World Monarchies and Dynasties |date=2015-06-01 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-45158-7 |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite book |last=Mayaram |first=Shail |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=pWtYEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA122&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwil1PC47NH9AhU_wAIHHcqYDFIQ6AF6BAgEEAI#v=onepage&q=ghuri%20afghan&f=false |title=The Secret Life of Another Indian Nationalism: Transitions from the Pax Britannica to the Pax Americana |date=2022-06-16 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-83257-1 |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite book |last=Hazārah |first=Fayz Muhammad Kātib |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=8tLE4hjSyjEC&pg=PA1109&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjItOnm8NH9AhXIUKQEHXM7Aso4ChDoAXoECAcQAg#v=onepage&q=ghuri%20afghan&f=false |title=The History of Afghanistan (6 Vol. Set): Fay? Mu?ammad K?tib Haz?rah’s Sir?j Al-taw?r?kh |date=2012-12-19 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-23491-8 |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":5" />, which ruled from the 10th-century to 1215. The Ghurids were centered in the hills of ] region in the present-day central ], where they initially started out as local chiefs. They gradually converted to ] from ] after the conquest of Ghor by the ] ruler ] in 1011. The Ghurids eventually overrun the Ghaznawids when ], An ] ruler<ref name=":6">{{Cite book |last=Spain |first=James William |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=-8YNAAAAIAAJ&q=ghuri+afghan&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiPosWG8tH9AhV0VaQEHXxmACA4KBDoAXoECAUQAg |title=The Pathan Borderland |date=1963 |publisher=Mouton |language=en}}</ref> ] and extinguished the Ghaznawids from their last stronghold. The '''Ghurid dynasty''' (also spelled '''Ghorids'''; {{lang-fa|دودمان غوریان|translit=Dudmân-e Ğurīyân}}; self-designation: {{lang|fa|شنسبانی}}, ''Šansabānī'') was a ] dynasty of presumably ] ] origin, which ruled from the 10th-century to 1215. The Ghurids were centered in the hills of ] region in the present-day central ], where they initially started out as local chiefs. They gradually converted to ] from ] after the conquest of Ghor by the ] ruler ] in 1011. The Ghurids eventually overrun the Ghaznawids when ] ] and extinguished the Ghaznawids from their last stronghold.


The Ghurids initially ruled as vassals of the ] and later of the ]s. However, during the early twelfth century the long-standing rivalry between the Seljuks and Ghaznawids created a power vacuum in ] which the Ghurids took advantage of and began their territorial expansion. An Afghan ruler<ref name=":7">{{Cite web |title=ʿAlāʾ-ud-Dīn Ḥusayn {{!}} Afghani ruler {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ala-ud-Din-Husayn |access-date=2023-03-10 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref>, ] launched a devastating raid in the Ghaznawid territory and sacked their capital, although he was defeated by the Seljuks which, for a brief period of time, would halt the rapid Ghurid expansion. The Ghurids initially ruled as vassals of the ] and later of the ]s. However, during the early twelfth century the long-standing rivalry between the Seljuks and Ghaznawids created a power vacuum in ] which the Ghurids took advantage of and began their territorial expansion. ] launched a devastating raid in the Ghaznawid territory and sacked their capital, although he was defeated by the Seljuks which, for a brief period of time, would halt the rapid Ghurid expansion.


However, under the ] of Alauddin nephews - ] and ], the Ghurids reached zenith of their territorial expansion. While, Ghiyasuddin was occupied with the Ghurid expansion in the west, his younger sibling Muhammad of Ghor along with his Turkic slave lieutenants began ] towards the ] and by turn of the twelfth century swept down the lower ] and extended the Ghurid influence as far east as the ] in ], while the Ghurids briefly reached as far as ] (present-day ]) in the west under Ghiyassuddin Ghuri. However, under the ] of Alauddin nephews - ] and ], the Ghurids reached zenith of their territorial expansion. While, Ghiyasuddin was occupied with the Ghurid expansion in the west, his younger sibling Muhammad of Ghor along with his Turkic slave lieutenants began ] towards the ] and by turn of the twelfth century swept down the lower ] and extended the Ghurid influence as far east as the ] in ], while the Ghurids briefly reached as far as ] (present-day ]) in the west under Ghiyassuddin Ghuri.
Line 79: Line 79:


==Origins== ==Origins==
In the 19th century some European scholars, such as ], favoured the idea that the Ghurid dynasty was related to today's ]<ref>]. The History of India. Vol. 1. J. Murray, 1841. Web. 29 April 2010. : ''"...the prevalent and apparently the correct opinion is, that both they and their subjects were Afghans. "'' & ''"In the time of Sultan Mahmud it was held, as has been observed, by a prince whom Ferishta calls Mohammed Soory (or Sur) Afghan."'' p.598-599</ref><ref>A short history of India: and of the frontier states of Afghanistan, Nipal, and Burma, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070609112709/http://janus.lib.cam.ac.uk/db/node.xsp?id=EAD%2FGBR%2F0115%2FY3022M |date=9 June 2007 }}, (): ''"The next conqueror after Mahmud who made a name in India, was Muhammad Ghori, the Afghan."''</ref><ref>]. The Cyclopædia of India and of Eastern and Southern Asia, Commercial Industrial, and Scientific: Products of the Mineral, Vegetable, and Animal Kingdoms, Useful Arts and Manufactures. 3rd ed. Vol. 2. London: Bernard Quaritch, 1885. Web. 29 April 2010. : ''"IZ-ud-DIN Husain, the founder of the Ghori dynaasty, was a native of Afghanistan. The origin of the house of Ghor has, however, been much discussed,&nbsp;– the prevailing opinion being that both they and their subjects were an Afghan race. "'' p.392</ref> but this is generally rejected by modern scholarship and, as explained by ] in the '']'', is for "various reasons very improbable".<ref name=EofI-Afghanistan>{{cite encyclopedia |author1=M. Longworth Dames |author2=G. Morgenstierne |author3=R. Ghirshman |title = AF<u>GH</u>ĀNISTĀN| encyclopedia = ]| edition = CD-ROM Edition v. 1.0| publisher = Koninklijke Brill NV| location = Leiden, The Netherlands| year = 1999 | quote=''"... there is no evidence for assuming that the inhabitants of Ghūr were originally Pashto-speaking (cf. Dames, in E I1). If we are to believe the Paṭa Khazāna (see below, iii), the legendary Amīr Karōṝ, grandson of Shansab, (8th century) was a Pashto poet, but this for various reasons is very improbable ..."''}}</ref> Some scholars state that the dynasty was of ] origin.<ref>{{Cite book |author=]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tLXXAAAAMAAJ&q=Rajputs |title=Essays on Islam and Indian History |date=2000 |publisher=Oxford University Press|page=100|quote=The dynamics of north Indian politics changed dramatically, however, when the Ghurids, a dynasty of Tajik (eastern Iranian), origina arrived from central Afghanistan towards the end of twelfth century|isbn=978-0-19-565114-0|language=en}}</ref><ref>], "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: ''"... The Shansabānīs were, like the rest of the <u>Gh</u>ūrīs, of eastern Iranian Tājik stock ..."''</ref>{{sfn|Wink|2020|p=78}}<ref>Cynthia Talbot, ''The Last Hindu Emperor: Prithviraj Chauhan and the Indian Past, 1200–2000'', (Cambridge University Press, 2016), 36.</ref>{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b|pp=586–590}}<ref>{{cite book |last1=Flood |first1=Finbarr B. |title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter |date=20 March 2018 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-18074-8 |page=92 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8MhJDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA92 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Avari |first1=Burjor |title=Islamic Civilization in South Asia: A History of Muslim Power and Presence in the Indian Subcontinent |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-58061-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hGHpVtQ8eKoC&pg=PA41 |language=en|page=41}}</ref>
Some Historians referred the Ghurid Dynasty to ]<ref name=":8">{{Cite book |last=Eaton |first=Richard Maxwell |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=tLXXAAAAMAAJ&q=Rajputs&redir_esc=y |title=Essays on Islam and Indian History |date=2000 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-565114-0 |language=en}}</ref> but in historical documents, the Ghurid Empire was mentioned as ] Origin.<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":7" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":4" /><ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=uWcOAQAAMAAJ&q=ghuri+afghan&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjCx9Sg9dH9AhWN_KQKHdmzCxA4MhDoAXoECAMQAg |title=Encyclopedia Indica: A Compendium of Milestones |date=2006 |publisher=Pelican Creations International |isbn=978-81-86738-14-6 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=83cAAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA41&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjCx9Sg9dH9AhWN_KQKHdmzCxA4MhDoAXoECAUQAg#v=onepage&q=ghuri%20afghan&f=false |title=The Dublin Magazine |date=1842 |publisher=J. P. Doyle |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Canby |first=Sheila R. |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=GfHqAAAAMAAJ&q=ghuri+afghan&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiWiIvU9dH9AhUIDewKHXlsDjY4PBDoAXoECAIQAg |title=Princes, Poets & Paladins: Islamic and Indian Paintings from the Collection of Prince and Princess Sadruddin Aga Khan |date=1998 |publisher=Trustees of the British Museum |isbn=978-0-7141-1483-5 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=dk03qFs34tUC&q=ghuri+afghan&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiWiIvU9dH9AhUIDewKHXlsDjY4PBDoAXoECAoQAg |title=Funk & Wagnalls Standard Reference Encyclopedia |date=1960 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Majid |first=Muhammad Abdul |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=BWtqp7zfRDIC&q=ghuri+afghan&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9ipX79dH9AhWQ_qQKHWX8A684RhDoAXoECAMQAg |title=The Emergence of Pakistan: With an Emphasis on the Role of Muhammad Ali Jinnah |date=1954 |publisher=University of Minnesota. |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Bakhshi |first=Abdul Samad |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=FWpCAAAAYAAJ&q=ghuri+afghan&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9ipX79dH9AhWQ_qQKHWX8A684RhDoAXoECAIQAg |title=Rural Development in Afghanistan and Suggestions for Implementation of an Expanded Program: Training of Personnel and Organization Needed for Its Efficient Operation |date=1958 |publisher=Cornell Univ., Sept. |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Pickthall |first=Marmaduke William |url=https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=kjRtAAAAMAAJ&q=ghuri+afghan&dq=ghuri+afghan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwil7tXf9tH9AhVKyaQKHYhbBNw4bhDoAXoECAIQAg |title=Islamic Culture |last2=Asad |first2=Muhammad |date=1986 |publisher=Islamic Culture Board |language=en}}</ref>

In the 19th century some European scholars, such as ], favoured the idea that the Ghurid dynasty was related to today's ]<ref>]. The History of India. Vol. 1. J. Murray, 1841. Web. 29 April 2010. : ''"...the prevalent and apparently the correct opinion is, that both they and their subjects were Afghans. "'' & ''"In the time of Sultan Mahmud it was held, as has been observed, by a prince whom Ferishta calls Mohammed Soory (or Sur) Afghan."'' p.598-599</ref><ref>A short history of India: and of the frontier states of Afghanistan, Nipal, and Burma, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070609112709/http://janus.lib.cam.ac.uk/db/node.xsp?id=EAD%2FGBR%2F0115%2FY3022M |date=9 June 2007 }}, (): ''"The next conqueror after Mahmud who made a name in India, was Muhammad Ghori, the Afghan."''</ref><ref>]. The Cyclopædia of India and of Eastern and Southern Asia, Commercial Industrial, and Scientific: Products of the Mineral, Vegetable, and Animal Kingdoms, Useful Arts and Manufactures. 3rd ed. Vol. 2. London: Bernard Quaritch, 1885. Web. 29 April 2010. : ''"IZ-ud-DIN Husain, the founder of the Ghori dynaasty, was a native of Afghanistan. The origin of the house of Ghor has, however, been much discussed,&nbsp;– the prevailing opinion being that both they and their subjects were an Afghan race. "'' p.392</ref>, Some scholars state that the dynasty was of ] origin.<ref>{{Cite book |author=]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tLXXAAAAMAAJ&q=Rajputs |title=Essays on Islam and Indian History |date=2000 |publisher=Oxford University Press|page=100|quote=The dynamics of north Indian politics changed dramatically, however, when the Ghurids, a dynasty of Tajik (eastern Iranian), origina arrived from central Afghanistan towards the end of twelfth century|isbn=978-0-19-565114-0|language=en}}</ref><ref>], "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: ''"... The Shansabānīs were, like the rest of the <u>Gh</u>ūrīs, of eastern Iranian Tājik stock ..."''</ref>{{sfn|Wink|2020|p=78}}<ref>Cynthia Talbot, ''The Last Hindu Emperor: Prithviraj Chauhan and the Indian Past, 1200–2000'', (Cambridge University Press, 2016), 36.</ref>{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b|pp=586–590}}<ref>{{cite book |last1=Flood |first1=Finbarr B. |title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter |date=20 March 2018 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-18074-8 |page=92 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8MhJDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA92 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Avari |first1=Burjor |title=Islamic Civilization in South Asia: A History of Muslim Power and Presence in the Indian Subcontinent |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-58061-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hGHpVtQ8eKoC&pg=PA41 |language=en|page=41}}</ref>

The ] site mentioned the founder of Ghurid Dynasty, Ala al-Din Husayn as a Afghan ruler of Ghurid Dynasty<ref>{{Cite web |title=ʿAlāʾ-ud-Dīn Ḥusayn {{!}} Afghani ruler {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ala-ud-Din-Husayn |access-date=2023-03-10 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref>.


'']'' states: "Nor do we know anything about the ethnic stock of the Ḡūrīs in general and the Šansabānīs in particular; we can only assume that they were eastern Iranian Tajiks".{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b|pp=586–590}} ] further points out that the actual name of the Ghurid family, ''Āl-e Šansab'' (Persianized: ''Šansabānī''), is the Arabic pronunciation of the originally ] name ''Wišnasp''.{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b|pp=586–590}} '']'' states: "Nor do we know anything about the ethnic stock of the Ḡūrīs in general and the Šansabānīs in particular; we can only assume that they were eastern Iranian Tajiks".{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b|pp=586–590}} ] further points out that the actual name of the Ghurid family, ''Āl-e Šansab'' (Persianized: ''Šansabānī''), is the Arabic pronunciation of the originally ] name ''Wišnasp''.{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b|pp=586–590}}
Line 98: Line 94:
The Ghurids' native language was apparently different from their court language, Persian. ], the famous historian of the Ghaznavid era, wrote on page 117 in his book '']'': "Sultan ] left for Ghoristan and sent his learned companion with two people from Ghor as interpreters between this person and the people of that region." However, like the ] and Ghaznavids, the Ghurids were great patrons of ], ], and ], and promoted these in their courts as their own. Modern-day authors refer to them as the "] Ghurids".<ref name="Persianate">{{cite book |last1=Flood |first1=Finbarr Barry |title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter |date=3 May 2009 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-12594-7 |page=3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OLNE_li8C10C&pg=PA3 |language=en}}</ref> Wink describes the tongue of the Ghurids as a "distinct Persian dialect".<ref name="New Cambridge"/> The Ghurids' native language was apparently different from their court language, Persian. ], the famous historian of the Ghaznavid era, wrote on page 117 in his book '']'': "Sultan ] left for Ghoristan and sent his learned companion with two people from Ghor as interpreters between this person and the people of that region." However, like the ] and Ghaznavids, the Ghurids were great patrons of ], ], and ], and promoted these in their courts as their own. Modern-day authors refer to them as the "] Ghurids".<ref name="Persianate">{{cite book |last1=Flood |first1=Finbarr Barry |title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter |date=3 May 2009 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-12594-7 |page=3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OLNE_li8C10C&pg=PA3 |language=en}}</ref> Wink describes the tongue of the Ghurids as a "distinct Persian dialect".<ref name="New Cambridge"/>


There is nothing to confirm the recent conclusion that the inhabitants of Ghor were originally ], and claims of the existence of "]", such as ], from the Ghurid period are unsubstantiated.<ref>], "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: ''"... There is nothing to confirm the recent surmise that the <u>Gh</u>ūids were Pa<u>sh</u>to-speaking the Paṭa Khazāna "Treasury of secrets", claims to include Pa<u>sh</u>to poetry from the <u>Gh</u>ūid period, but the significance of this work has not yet been evaluated ..."''</ref><ref name="EofI-Afghanistan">{{cite encyclopedia |year=1999 |title=AF<u>GH</u>ĀNISTĀN |encyclopedia=] |publisher=Koninklijke Brill NV |location=Leiden, The Netherlands |edition=CD-ROM Edition v. 1.0 |quote=''"... there is no evidence for assuming that the inhabitants of Ghūr were originally Pashto-speaking (cf. Dames, in E I1). If we are to believe the Paṭa Khazāna (see below, iii), the legendary Amīr Karōṝ, grandson of Shansab, (8th century) was a Pashto poet, but this for various reasons is very improbable ..."'' |author2=G. Morgenstierne |author3=R. Ghirshman |author1=M. Longworth Dames}}</ref> There is nothing to confirm the recent conclusion that the inhabitants of Ghor were originally ], and claims of the existence of "]", such as ], from the Ghurid period are unsubstantiated.<ref>], "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: ''"... There is nothing to confirm the recent surmise that the <u>Gh</u>ūids were Pa<u>sh</u>to-speaking the Paṭa Khazāna "Treasury of secrets", claims to include Pa<u>sh</u>to poetry from the <u>Gh</u>ūid period, but the significance of this work has not yet been evaluated ..."''</ref><ref name="EofI-Afghanistan"/>


==History== ==History==
Line 113: Line 109:
}} }}
A certain Ghurid prince named Amir Banji was the ruler of ] and ancestor of the medieval Ghurid rulers. His rule was legitimized by the ] ] ]. A certain Ghurid prince named Amir Banji was the ruler of ] and ancestor of the medieval Ghurid rulers. His rule was legitimized by the ] ] ].
Before the mid-12th century, the Ghurids had been bound to the ] and ] for about 150 years. Beginning in the mid-12th century, Ghor expressed its independence from the Ghaznavid Empire. In 1149 the Ghaznavid ruler ] poisoned a local Ghurid leader, Qutb al-Din Muhammad, who had taken refuge in the city of ] after having a quarrel with his brother ]. In revenge, Sayf marched towards Ghazni and defeated Bahram-Shah. However, one year later, Bahram returned and scored a decisive victory against Sayf, who was shortly captured and crucified at Pul-i Yak Taq. ], another brother of Sayf, set out to avenge the death of his two brothers, but died of natural causes before he could reach Ghazni. ], one of the youngest of Sayf's brothers and newly crowned Ghurid Afghan king<ref name=":7" />, also set out to avenge the death of his two brothers. He managed to defeat Bahram-Shah, and then had Ghazni sacked; the city burned for seven days and seven nights. It earned him the title of ''Jahānsūz'', meaning "''the world burner"''.{{sfn|Bosworth|2001a|pp=578–583}} The Ghaznavids retook the city with ] help, but lost it to ].{{sfn|Bosworth|2001a|pp=578–583}} Before the mid-12th century, the Ghurids had been bound to the ] and ] for about 150 years. Beginning in the mid-12th century, Ghor expressed its independence from the Ghaznavid Empire. In 1149 the Ghaznavid ruler ] poisoned a local Ghurid leader, Qutb al-Din Muhammad, who had taken refuge in the city of ] after having a quarrel with his brother ]. In revenge, Sayf marched towards Ghazni and defeated Bahram-Shah. However, one year later, Bahram returned and scored a decisive victory against Sayf, who was shortly captured and crucified at Pul-i Yak Taq. ], another brother of Sayf, set out to avenge the death of his two brothers, but died of natural causes before he could reach Ghazni. ], one of the youngest of Sayf's brothers and newly crowned Ghurid king, also set out to avenge the death of his two brothers. He managed to defeat Bahram-Shah, and then had Ghazni sacked; the city burned for seven days and seven nights. It earned him the title of ''Jahānsūz'', meaning "''the world burner"''.{{sfn|Bosworth|2001a|pp=578–583}} The Ghaznavids retook the city with ] help, but lost it to ].{{sfn|Bosworth|2001a|pp=578–583}}


In 1152, Ala al-Din Husayn refused to pay tribute to the ] and instead marched an army from Firozkoh but was defeated and captured at Nab by ].<ref>''Ghurids'', C.E. Bosworth, '''Encyclopedia of Islam''', Vol.2, Ed. Bernard Lewis, C. Pellat and J. Schacht, (E.J.Brill, 1991), 1100.</ref> Ala al-Din Husayn remained a prisoner for two years, until he was released in return for a heavy ransom to the Seljuqs. Meanwhile, a rival of Ala al-Din named Husayn ibn Nasir al-Din Muhammad al-Madini had seized ], but was murdered at the right moment when Ala al-Din returned to reclaim his ancestral domain. Ala al-Din spent the rest of his reign expanding the domains of his kingdom; he managed to conquer Garchistan, ], and ], and later gave Bamiyan and Tukharistan to Fakhr al-Din Masud, starting the Bamiyan branch of the Ghurids. Ala al-Din died in 1161, and was succeeded by his son ], who died two years later in a battle. In 1152, Ala al-Din Husayn refused to pay tribute to the ] and instead marched an army from Firozkoh but was defeated and captured at Nab by ].<ref>''Ghurids'', C.E. Bosworth, '''Encyclopedia of Islam''', Vol.2, Ed. Bernard Lewis, C. Pellat and J. Schacht, (E.J.Brill, 1991), 1100.</ref> Ala al-Din Husayn remained a prisoner for two years, until he was released in return for a heavy ransom to the Seljuqs. Meanwhile, a rival of Ala al-Din named Husayn ibn Nasir al-Din Muhammad al-Madini had seized ], but was murdered at the right moment when Ala al-Din returned to reclaim his ancestral domain. Ala al-Din spent the rest of his reign expanding the domains of his kingdom; he managed to conquer Garchistan, ], and ], and later gave Bamiyan and Tukharistan to Fakhr al-Din Masud, starting the Bamiyan branch of the Ghurids. Ala al-Din died in 1161, and was succeeded by his son ], who died two years later in a battle.
Line 142: Line 138:
In 1202-1203 CE, Qutbu l-Din Aibak, now Ghurid governor of ], invaded the ] in the ].{{sfn|Sisirkumar Mitra|1977|pp=123–126}} The Ghurids toppled local dynasties and destroyed Hindu temples during their advance across northern India, in place constructing ]s on the same sites.{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=39–45}} In 1202-1203 CE, Qutbu l-Din Aibak, now Ghurid governor of ], invaded the ] in the ].{{sfn|Sisirkumar Mitra|1977|pp=123–126}} The Ghurids toppled local dynasties and destroyed Hindu temples during their advance across northern India, in place constructing ]s on the same sites.{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=39–45}}


Around 1203, ], another ] general of the Ghurid Empire, led the ] of the eastern Indian regions of ] and ], also on behalf of Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad.<ref name="THCI"/> In Bihar, he is said to have destroyed Buddhist centers of learning such as ], greatly contributing to the decline of pre-Islamic Indic scholarship.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Roy |first1=Himanshu |title=Political Thought in Indic Civilization |date=30 August 2021 |publisher=SAGE Publishing India |isbn=978-93-5479-159-8 |page=6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rAVBEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA6 |language=en|quote="After the arrival of Islam, the universities such as Nalanda and Vikramshila were no longer existent. The destruction of Nalanda by Bakhtiyar Khalji was the last nail in this pre-Islamic Indic university, which had survived three major destructions"}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Koh |first1=Tommy |last2=Singh |first2=Hernaikh |title=India on Our Minds: Essays By Tharman Shanmugaratnam And 50 Singaporean Friends of India |date=25 November 2020 |publisher=World Scientific |isbn=978-981-12-2453-9 |page=91 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M5wPEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA91 |language=en}}</ref> In Bengal, he sacked the ancient city of ] in central Bengal, and established an Islamic government in the former ] capital of ] in 1205.<ref name="THCI">{{cite book |title=Turkish History and Culture in India: Identity, Art and Transregional Connections |date=17 August 2020 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-43736-4 |page=237 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ml75DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA237 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Majumdar |first=R. C. |year=1973 |title=History of Mediaeval Bengal |location=Calcutta |publisher=G. Bharadwaj & Co. |oclc=1031074 |pages=1–2 |quote=Tradition gives him credit for the conquest of Bengal but as a matter of fact he could not subjugate the greater part of Bengal ... All that Bakhtyār can justly take credit for is that by his conquest of Western and a part of Northern Bengal he laid the foundation of the Muslim State in Bengal. The historians of the 13th century never attributed the conquest of the whole of Bengal to Bakhtyār.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Mehta |first1=Jaswant Lal |year=1986 |orig-year=First published 1979 |title=Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iUk5k5AN54sC&pg=PA81 |volume=I |edition=2nd |publisher=Sterling Publishers |isbn=978-81-207-0617-0 |oclc=883279992 |pages=81–82 |quote=The Turkish arms penetrated into Bihar and Bengal, through the enterprising efforts of Ikhtiyaruddin Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji ... he started plundering raids into Bihar and, within four or five years, occupied a large part of it ... Nadia was sacked by the Turks and a few districts of Bengal (Malda, Dinajpur, Murshidabad and Birbhum) were occupied by them ... Bathtiyar Khalji could not retain his hold over Nadia and made Lakhnauti or Gaur as his capital.}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DnZuAAAAMAAJ&q=Bakhtiyar+Khalji+bengal+and+bihar|title=India and the Afghans: A study of a neglected region, 1370–1576 A.D |isbn=9788185078687 |last1=Thakur |first1=Amrendra Kumar | year=1992| page=148}}</ref> Around 1203, ], another ] general of the Ghurid Empire, led the ] of the eastern Indian regions of ] and ], also on behalf of Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad.<ref name="THCI"/> In Bihar, he is said to have destroyed Buddhist centers of learning such as ], greatly contributing to the decline of pre-Islamic Indic scholarship.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Roy |first1=Himanshu |title=Political Thought in Indic Civilization |date=30 August 2021 |publisher=SAGE Publishing India |isbn=978-93-5479-159-8 |page=6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rAVBEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA6 |language=en|quote="After the arrival of Islam, the universities such as Nalanda and Vikramshila were no longer existent. The destruction of Nalanda by Bakhtiyar Khalji was the last nail in this pre-Islamic Indic university, which had survived three major destructions"}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Koh |first1=Tommy |last2=Singh |first2=Hernaikh |title=India on Our Minds: Essays By Tharman Shanmugaratnam And 50 Singaporean Friends of India |date=25 November 2020 |publisher=World Scientific |isbn=978-981-12-2453-9 |page=91 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M5wPEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA91 |language=en}}</ref> In Bengal, he sacked the ancient city of ] in central Bengal, and established an Islamic government in the former ] capital of ] in 1205.<ref name="THCI">{{cite book |title=Turkish History and Culture in India: Identity, Art and Transregional Connections |date=17 August 2020 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-43736-4 |page=237 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ml75DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA237 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Majumdar |first=R. C. |year=1973 |title=History of Mediaeval Bengal |location=Calcutta |publisher=G. Bharadwaj & Co. |oclc=1031074 |pages=1–2 |quote=Tradition gives him credit for the conquest of Bengal but as a matter of fact he could not subjugate the greater part of Bengal ... All that Bakhtyār can justly take credit for is that by his conquest of Western and a part of Northern Bengal he laid the foundation of the Muslim State in Bengal. The historians of the 13th century never attributed the conquest of the whole of Bengal to Bakhtyār.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Mehta |first1=Jaswant Lal |year=1986 |orig-year=First published 1979 |title=Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iUk5k5AN54sC&pg=PA81 |volume=I |edition=2nd |publisher=Sterling Publishers |isbn=978-81-207-0617-0 |oclc=883279992 |pages=81–82 |quote=The Turkish arms penetrated into Bihar and Bengal, through the enterprising efforts of Ikhtiyaruddin Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji ... he started plundering raids into Bihar and, within four or five years, occupied a large part of it ... Nadia was sacked by the Turks and a few districts of Bengal (Malda, Dinajpur, Murshidabad and Birbhum) were occupied by them ... Bathtiyar Khalji could not retain his hold over Nadia and made Lakhnauti or Gaur as his capital.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DnZuAAAAMAAJ&q=Bakhtiyar+Khalji+bengal+and+bihar|title=India and the Afghans: A study of a neglected region, 1370–1576 A.D |isbn=9788185078687 |last1=Thakur |first1=Amrendra Kumar | year=1992| page=148}}</ref>


Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad placed his faithful Turkic generals, rather than his own Ghurid brethens, in position of authority over local tributary kings, throughout the conquered Indian lands.{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=39–45}} After the death of Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad in early 1206, his territories fragmented into smaller Sultanates led by his former ] generals. ] became the ruler of ]. ] became Sultan of ]. ] became Sultan of ].<ref>{{cite book |author=K. A. Nizami |author-link=K. A. Nizami |chapter=The Early Turkish Sultans of Delhi |editor1=Mohammad Habib |editor2=Khaliq Ahmad Nizami |title=A Comprehensive History of India: The Delhi Sultanat (A.D. 1206–1526) |volume=5 |edition=Second |year=1992 |publisher=The Indian History Congress / People's Publishing House |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_9cmAQAAMAAJ |oclc=31870180 |page=201}}</ref> ] became Sultan of ], but was soon assassinated and succeeded by several ], until Bengal was incorporated into the ] Sultanate in 1227.<ref>{{cite book | first1=George F. | last1=Nafziger | first2=Mark W. | last2=Walton | title=Islam at War: A History | url=https://archive.org/details/islamatwarhistor0000nafz | url-access=registration | publisher=Praeger Publishers | year=2003 | page=| isbn=9780275981013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Chandra |first1=Satish |author-link=Satish Chandra|title=Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206-1526) – Part One |date=2004 |publisher=Har-Anand Publications |isbn=978-81-241-1064-5 |pages=43–44 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L5eFzeyjBTQC&pg=PA43 |language=en}}</ref> Between 1206 and 1228 the various Turkic rulers and their successors rivaled for preeminence until the Sultan of Delhi ] prevailed, marking the advent of the ]. This was the first dynasty of the ], which in total had five dynasties and would rule most of India for more than three centuries until the advent of the ] in 1526.{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=39–45}} Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad placed his faithful Turkic generals, rather than his own Ghurid brethens, in position of authority over local tributary kings, throughout the conquered Indian lands.{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=39–45}} After the death of Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad in early 1206, his territories fragmented into smaller Sultanates led by his former ] generals. ] became the ruler of ]. ] became Sultan of ]. ] became Sultan of ].<ref>{{cite book |author=K. A. Nizami |author-link=K. A. Nizami |chapter=The Early Turkish Sultans of Delhi |editor1=Mohammad Habib |editor2=Khaliq Ahmad Nizami |title=A Comprehensive History of India: The Delhi Sultanat (A.D. 1206–1526) |volume=5 |edition=Second |year=1992 |publisher=The Indian History Congress / People's Publishing House |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_9cmAQAAMAAJ |oclc=31870180 |page=201}}</ref> ] became Sultan of ], but was soon assassinated and succeeded by several ], until Bengal was incorporated into the ] Sultanate in 1227.<ref>{{cite book | first1=George F. | last1=Nafziger | first2=Mark W. | last2=Walton | title=Islam at War: A History | url=https://archive.org/details/islamatwarhistor0000nafz | url-access=registration | publisher=Praeger Publishers | year=2003 | page=| isbn=9780275981013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Chandra |first1=Satish |author-link=Satish Chandra|title=Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206-1526) – Part One |date=2004 |publisher=Har-Anand Publications |isbn=978-81-241-1064-5 |pages=43–44 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L5eFzeyjBTQC&pg=PA43 |language=en}}</ref> Between 1206 and 1228 the various Turkic rulers and their successors rivaled for preeminence until the Sultan of Delhi ] prevailed, marking the advent of the ]. This was the first dynasty of the ], which in total had five dynasties and would rule most of India for more than three centuries until the advent of the ] in 1526.{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=39–45}}

Revision as of 18:17, 10 March 2023

Late 9th-century–1215 Iranian dynasty from Ghor, modern Afghanistan

Ghurid dynasty
before 879–1215
Ghurid dynasty is located in Ghurids1203KHWARAZMIAN
EMPIRE
KIPCHAKSABBASID
CALIPHATE
ZENGIDSYADAVASPARA-
MARAS
CHANDELASQOCHOQARA KHITAIKARA-
KHANIDS
Map of Ghurid territory, before the assassination of Muhammad of Ghor. In the west, Ghurid territory extended to Nishapur and Merv, while Ghurid troops reached as far as Gorgan on the shores of the Caspian Sea. Eastward, the Ghurids invaded as far as Bengal.
CapitalFirozkoh
Herat
Ghazni (1170s–1215)
Common languagesPersian (court, literature)
Religion before 1011:
Buddhism
From 1011:
Sunni Islam
GovernmentHereditary monarchy
Malik/Sultan 
• 9th-century–10th-century Amir Suri (first)
• 1214–1215 Ala al-Din Ali (last)
History 
• Established before 879
• Disestablished 1215
Area
1200 est.2,000,000 km (770,000 sq mi)
Preceded by Succeeded by
Ghaznavids
Great Seljuq Empire
Chahamanas of Shakambhari
Gahadavala dynasty
Khwarazmian Empire
Mamluk dynasty (Delhi)
Khalji dynasty of Bengal
Delhi Sultanate
Qarlughids

The Ghurid dynasty (also spelled Ghorids; Template:Lang-fa; self-designation: شنسبانی, Šansabānī) was a Persianate dynasty of presumably eastern Iranian Tajik origin, which ruled from the 10th-century to 1215. The Ghurids were centered in the hills of Ghor region in the present-day central Afghanistan, where they initially started out as local chiefs. They gradually converted to Sunni Islam from Buddhism after the conquest of Ghor by the Ghaznawid ruler Mahmud of Ghazni in 1011. The Ghurids eventually overrun the Ghaznawids when Muhammad of Ghor siezed Lahore and extinguished the Ghaznawids from their last stronghold.

The Ghurids initially ruled as vassals of the Ghaznawids and later of the Seljuks. However, during the early twelfth century the long-standing rivalry between the Seljuks and Ghaznawids created a power vacuum in Khurasan which the Ghurids took advantage of and began their territorial expansion. Ala al-Din Husayn launched a devastating raid in the Ghaznawid territory and sacked their capital, although he was defeated by the Seljuks which, for a brief period of time, would halt the rapid Ghurid expansion.

However, under the diarchy of Alauddin nephews - Ghiyassuddin Ghuri and Muhammad of Ghor, the Ghurids reached zenith of their territorial expansion. While, Ghiyasuddin was occupied with the Ghurid expansion in the west, his younger sibling Muhammad of Ghor along with his Turkic slave lieutenants began raiding in the east towards the Indian Subcontinent and by turn of the twelfth century swept down the lower Gangetic Plain and extended the Ghurid influence as far east as the Ganges delta in Bengal, while the Ghurids briefly reached as far as Gorgan (present-day Iran) in the west under Ghiyassuddin Ghuri.

Ghiyasuddin died in 1203 of illness and soon after the Ghurids suffered a catastrophe against the Qara Khitais (with the aid of the Khwarezmian Empire) in the Battle of Andkhud, fought on the banks of the Amu Darya in 1204. Muhammad was assassinated soon after in March 1206 on the bank of Indus, which effectively ended the Ghurid sovereignty as the subsequent rulers were vassalized by their Turkish rivals on the western frontier - the Khwrezmians under Muhammad II. The Ghurids continued to rule as their vassals, before they were overthrown in 1215, although their conquests in the Indian Subcontinent survived for several centuries under the evolving Delhi Sultanate established by the Ghurid Turk mamluk Qutb ud-Din Aibak.

Origins

In the 19th century some European scholars, such as Mountstuart Elphinstone, favoured the idea that the Ghurid dynasty was related to today's Pashtun people but this is generally rejected by modern scholarship and, as explained by Morgenstierne in the Encyclopaedia of Islam, is for "various reasons very improbable". Some scholars state that the dynasty was of Tajik origin.

Encyclopædia Iranica states: "Nor do we know anything about the ethnic stock of the Ḡūrīs in general and the Šansabānīs in particular; we can only assume that they were eastern Iranian Tajiks". Bosworth further points out that the actual name of the Ghurid family, Āl-e Šansab (Persianized: Šansabānī), is the Arabic pronunciation of the originally Middle Persian name Wišnasp.

The Ghurids originated from Ghor Province in central Afghanistan.

Historian André Wink explains in The New Cambridge History of Islam:

The Shansabānī dynasty superseded the Ghaznavids in the second half of the twelfth century. This dynasty was not of Turkish, nor even Afghan, but of eastern Persian or Tājīk origin, speaking a distinct Persian dialect of its own, like the rest of the inhabitants of the remote and isolated mountain region of Ghūr and its capital of Fīrūzkūh (in what is now central Afghanistan).

When the Ghurids started to distinguish themselves through their conquests, courtiers and genealogists (such as Fakhr-i Mudabbir and al-Juzjani) forged a fictive genealogy which connected the Ghurids with the Iranian past. They traced the Ghurid family back to the mythical Arab tyrant Zahhak, mentioned in the medieval Persian epic Shahnameh ("The Book of Kings"), whose family had reportedly settled in Ghur after the Iranian hero Fereydun had ended Zahhak's thousand-year tyranny.

Coinage of Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad. Dated AH 601 (1204/5 CE), Ghazni mint.

Ghur remained primarily populated by Buddhists until the 11th century. It was then Islamised and gave rise to the Ghurids.

Language

The Ghurids' native language was apparently different from their court language, Persian. Abu'l-Fadl Bayhaqi, the famous historian of the Ghaznavid era, wrote on page 117 in his book Tarikh-i Bayhaqi: "Sultan Mas'ud I of Ghazni left for Ghoristan and sent his learned companion with two people from Ghor as interpreters between this person and the people of that region." However, like the Samanids and Ghaznavids, the Ghurids were great patrons of Persian literature, poetry, and culture, and promoted these in their courts as their own. Modern-day authors refer to them as the "Persianized Ghurids". Wink describes the tongue of the Ghurids as a "distinct Persian dialect".

There is nothing to confirm the recent conclusion that the inhabitants of Ghor were originally Pashto-speaking, and claims of the existence of "Pashto poetry", such as Pata Khazana, from the Ghurid period are unsubstantiated.

History

Early history

Jam MinaretThe Minaret of Jam in Ghor Province of Afghanistan, established by the Ghurids and finished in 1174/75 CE. Inscription on the Minaret, showing the name and titles of Sultan Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad (1163–1202 CE).

A certain Ghurid prince named Amir Banji was the ruler of Ghor and ancestor of the medieval Ghurid rulers. His rule was legitimized by the Abbasid caliph Harun al-Rashid. Before the mid-12th century, the Ghurids had been bound to the Ghaznavids and Seljuks for about 150 years. Beginning in the mid-12th century, Ghor expressed its independence from the Ghaznavid Empire. In 1149 the Ghaznavid ruler Bahram-Shah of Ghazna poisoned a local Ghurid leader, Qutb al-Din Muhammad, who had taken refuge in the city of Ghazni after having a quarrel with his brother Sayf al-Din Suri. In revenge, Sayf marched towards Ghazni and defeated Bahram-Shah. However, one year later, Bahram returned and scored a decisive victory against Sayf, who was shortly captured and crucified at Pul-i Yak Taq. Baha al-Din Sam I, another brother of Sayf, set out to avenge the death of his two brothers, but died of natural causes before he could reach Ghazni. Ala al-Din Husayn, one of the youngest of Sayf's brothers and newly crowned Ghurid king, also set out to avenge the death of his two brothers. He managed to defeat Bahram-Shah, and then had Ghazni sacked; the city burned for seven days and seven nights. It earned him the title of Jahānsūz, meaning "the world burner". The Ghaznavids retook the city with Seljuq help, but lost it to Oghuz Turks.

In 1152, Ala al-Din Husayn refused to pay tribute to the Seljuks and instead marched an army from Firozkoh but was defeated and captured at Nab by Sultan Ahmed Sanjar. Ala al-Din Husayn remained a prisoner for two years, until he was released in return for a heavy ransom to the Seljuqs. Meanwhile, a rival of Ala al-Din named Husayn ibn Nasir al-Din Muhammad al-Madini had seized Firozkoh, but was murdered at the right moment when Ala al-Din returned to reclaim his ancestral domain. Ala al-Din spent the rest of his reign expanding the domains of his kingdom; he managed to conquer Garchistan, Tukharistan, and Bamiyan, and later gave Bamiyan and Tukharistan to Fakhr al-Din Masud, starting the Bamiyan branch of the Ghurids. Ala al-Din died in 1161, and was succeeded by his son Sayf al-Din Muhammad, who died two years later in a battle.

The Ghurids at their zenith

Fortress and Ghurid arch of Qala-e-Bost as printed on an Afghan banknote.

Sayf al-Din Muhammad was succeeded by his cousin Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad, who was the son of Baha al-Din Sam I, and proved himself to be a capable king. Right after Ghiyath's ascension, he, with the aid of his loyal brother Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad (later known as "Muhammmad Ghori"), killed a rival Ghurid chief named Abu'l Abbas. Ghiyath then defeated his uncle Fakhr al-Din Masud who claimed the Ghurid throne and had allied with the Seljuq governor of Herat and Balkh.

In 1173, Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad reconquered the city of Ghazni and assisted his brother Ghiyath in his contest with the Khwarezmian Empire for the lordship of Khorasan.

After the death of his brother Ghiyath on 13 March 1203, Mu'izz al-Din became the successor of his empire and ruled until his assassination in 1206 near Jhelum by Ismāʿīlīs whom he persecuted during his lifetime.

Conquest of India and Bengal

Main article: Indian campaigns of Muhammad of Ghor
The last stand of Rajputs, depicting the Second Battle of Tarain in 1192
Ghurid dynasty is located in South AsiaGhurid dynastyGhurid dynastySouth Asia
1175 CE
KARAKHANID
KHANATE
QARA KHITAIGHURID
EMPIRE
KUMAONCHAULUKYASCHAHAMANASLATE
GHAZNAVIDS
PARAMARASWESTERN
CHALUKYAS
KAKATIYASSHILA-
HARAS
CHOLASCHERASPANDYASKADAMBASHOYSALASGAHADAVALASGUHILASKACHCHAPA-
GHATAS
CHANDELASKALACHURIS
(TRIPURI)
KALACHURIS
(RATNAPURA)
SENASKARNATASNAGVANSISKAMARUPASEASTERN
GANGAS
GUGEMARYULLOHA-
RAS
SOOMRA
EMIRATE
MAKRAN
SULTANATE
class=notpageimage| Main South Asian polities in 1175, on the eve of the Ghurid Empire invasion of the subcontinent (orange line: Ghurid territorial conquests from 1175 to 1205).
Bengal coinage of Turkic general Bakhtiyar Khalji (1204–1206 CE). Struck in the name of Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad, dated Samvat 1262 (1204 CE).

On the eve of the Ghurid invasion of the subcontinent, Northern India was ruled by many independent Rajput kings, often fighting with each other, such as the Chahamana ruler Prithviraja III in Delhi and Ajmer, the Chaulukya ruler Mularaja II in Gujarat, the Gahadavala ruler Jayachandra in Kanauj, or the Sena ruler Lakshmana in Bengal.

Northern India and Bengal were conquered by Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad during the period from 1175 to 1205, just before his death in 1206. His capital was in Ghazni (previously conquered in 1148 CE), while his elder brother Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad ruled the western part of the Empire. In 1175, Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad captured Multan from its Ismaili Muslim community, and also took Uch by 1176.

In 1178, he turned south and marched through the Thar desert, his armies got exhausted in their march and were routed in the Battle of Kasahrada in the hilly pass of Gadararaghatta by a coalition of Rajput chiefs, which forced him to change his route for further inroads into India. Shifting to the north, he conquered Peshawar and Sialkot and annexed the last Ghaznavid principality of the Punjab, with their capital in Lahore, in the Siege of Lahore (1186).

In 1191, the Ghurids seized Bathinda and marched towards Delhi, but were defeated in the First Battle of Tarain by the Rajput confederacy led by the ruler of Delhi, the Ajmer-Chahamana king Prithviraja III. Nevertheless, Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad returned a year later with an army of Turkish mounted archers and routed the Rajput forces in the Second Battle of Tarain, and executed Prithviraja shortly afterwards. Govindaraja IV, son of Prithviraj Chauhan, submitted to the Ghurids the region of Ajmer, which became a vassal state. In 1193, Delhi was conquered by Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad's general Qutbu l-Din Aibak. The newly conquered territories were then put under the governorship of Qutb ud-Din Aibak, who was now Viceroy in Delhi.

In 1194, Mu'izz returned to India and crossed the Jamuna with an army of 50,000 horses and at the Battle of Chandawar defeated the forces of the Gahadavala king Jayachandra, who was killed in action. After the battle, Mu'izz continued his advance to the east, with his general Qutb ud-Din Aibak in the vanguard. The city of Benares (Kashi) was taken and razed, and "idols in a thousand temples" were destroyed. It is generally thought that the Buddhist city of Sarnath was also ravaged at that time. In 1196, Qutb ud-Din Aibak vanquished Sulakshanapala, the ruler of the Kachchhapaghata dynasty of Gwalior, capturing Gwalior fort. Also in 1196, Qutb ud-Din Aibak vanquished a coalition of the Rajputs of Ajmer and the Chaulukyas under king Bhima II at Mount Abu, thereafter plundering Anhilwara.

In 1202-1203 CE, Qutbu l-Din Aibak, now Ghurid governor of Delhi, invaded the Chandela kingdom in the Ganges Valley. The Ghurids toppled local dynasties and destroyed Hindu temples during their advance across northern India, in place constructing mosques on the same sites.

Around 1203, Bakhtiyar Khalji, another Turkic general of the Ghurid Empire, led the Muslim conquests of the eastern Indian regions of Bihar and Bengal, also on behalf of Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad. In Bihar, he is said to have destroyed Buddhist centers of learning such as Nalanda University, greatly contributing to the decline of pre-Islamic Indic scholarship. In Bengal, he sacked the ancient city of Nudiya in central Bengal, and established an Islamic government in the former Sena capital of Lakhnauti in 1205.

Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad placed his faithful Turkic generals, rather than his own Ghurid brethens, in position of authority over local tributary kings, throughout the conquered Indian lands. After the death of Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad in early 1206, his territories fragmented into smaller Sultanates led by his former Mamluk generals. Taj-ud-Din Yildoz became the ruler of Ghazni. Nasir-ud-Din Qabacha became Sultan of Multan. Qutb ud-Din Aibak became Sultan of Delhi. Bakhtiyar Khilji became Sultan of Bengal, but was soon assassinated and succeeded by several Khalji rulers, until Bengal was incorporated into the Delhi Sultanate in 1227. Between 1206 and 1228 the various Turkic rulers and their successors rivaled for preeminence until the Sultan of Delhi Iltutmish prevailed, marking the advent of the Mamluk dynasty. This was the first dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate, which in total had five dynasties and would rule most of India for more than three centuries until the advent of the Mughal Empire in 1526.

Decline and fall

Main article: Battle of Andkhud Ghurid dynasty is located in Continental Asia1215KHWARAZMIAN
EMPIRE
CUMAN KHANATESKIEVAN
RUS'
MONGOL
CONFEDERATION
KIPCHACKSQARA KHITAIQOCHOGHURIDSZENGIDSABBASID
CALIPHATE
YADAVASJIN
DYNASTY
XI XIASONG
DYNASTY
PAGANDALIKHMERAYYUBID
SULTANATE
SULTANATE
OF RUM
GO-
RYEO
class=notpageimage| The Ghurid Empire and contemporary Asian polities c. 1215

Ghiyath died on 13 March 1203 and was succeeded by Mu'izz al-Din as the sole ruler of the vast Ghurid realm. Soonafter, Alauddin Khwarazm Shah besieged and captured some of the strongholds of the Ghurids around Merv, although Mu'izz drove him back and further besieged their capital Gurgānj. However, Alauddin forces were supplemented by a large contingent from the Qara-Khitai rulers of Samarkand. In the ensuing battle Battle of Andkhud (1204), fought near the river Oxus, Mu'izz troops were completely routed by the combined forces of Qara Khitai and Kara-Khanid Khanate led by Tayangu of Taraz, and he himself escaped the debacle after paying huge ransom to Tayangu. The defeat at Andkhud was a watershed for the Ghurids who lost their control over most of the Khurasan. Notwithstanding, Mu'izz within a year or so raised a vast army and build bridge across the Oxus to launch a full-scale invasion of Transoxiana to avenge his defeat. However, he was forced to move towards Punjab to crush a Khokhar rebellion whom he defeated and massacred in large number. On his way back, Mu'izz was assassinated near the Indus on March 15, 1206.

After the death of Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad in 1206, a confused struggle then ensued among the remaining Ghūrid leaders, and the Khwarezmians were able to take over the western part of the Ghūrid empire in about 1215. Though the Ghūrids' empire was short-lived, Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad's conquests strengthened the foundations of Muslim rule in India. On his death, and major defeats from Khwarazmian Empire and loss of Ghor and Ghazni, the capital was transferred to Delhi recognizing Khwarazmian rule on north and central Afghanistan. The Ghurids continued their rule on much of the Indian subcontinent, Sisitan region of Iran and south of Afghanistan.

Culture

Ornamental bands on the Minaret of Jam, bearing the 19th Sura of the Koran.

The Ghurids were great patrons of Persian culture and literature and lay the basis for a Persianized state in the Indian subcontinent. However, most of the literature produced during the Ghurid era has been lost. They also transferred Iranian architecture to India. According to Amir Khusrau (died 1325), the Indians learned Persian because of the influence of the "Ghurids and Turks." The notion of Persian kingship served as the basis for the imperial formation, political and cultural unity of the Ghurids.

Out of the Ghurid state grew the Delhi Sultanate which established the Persian language as the official court language of the region – a status it retained until the late Mughal era in the 19th century.

There was a strong Turkic presence among the Ghurids, since Turk slave-soldiers formed the vanguard of the Ghurid armies. There was intense amalgamation between these various ethnic groups: "a notable admixture of Tajik, Persian, Turkish and indigenous Afghan ethnicities therefore characterized the Shansabanis". At least until the end of the 13th century when they ruled the Mamluk Sultanate in India, the Turks in the Ghurid realm maintained their ethnical characteristics, continuing to use Turkish as their main language, rather than Persian, and persisting in their rude and bellicose ways as "men of the sword", in opposition to the Persian "men of the pen".

  • The two mausoleums of Chisht (the western was built in 1167) The two mausoleums of Chisht (the western was built in 1167)
  • The eastern mausoleum of Chisht (built in 1194) The eastern mausoleum of Chisht (built in 1194)
  • Ruins of the Shah-i Mashhad madrasa (built in 1176) Ruins of the Shah-i Mashhad madrasa (built in 1176)
  • Ghurid arch in Qala-e-Bost Ghurid arch in Qala-e-Bost

List of rulers

Coinage Titular Name(s) Personal Name Reign
Malik
ملک
Amir Suri
امیر سوری
9th-century – 10th-century
Malik
ملک
Muhammad ibn Suri
محمد بن سوری
10th-century – 1011
As vassals of the Ghaznavid Empire
Malik
ملک
Abu Ali ibn Muhammad
ابوعلی بن محمد
1011–1035
Malik
ملک
Abbas ibn Shith
عباس بن شیث
1035 – 1060
Malik
ملک
Muhammad ibn Abbas
محمد بن عباس
1060 – 1080
Malik
ملک
Qutb al-din Hasan
قطب‌ الدین حسن
1080 – 1100
As vassals of the Seljuk Empire
Abul-Muluk
ابولملک
Izz al-Din Husayn
عز الدین حسین
1100–1146
Malik
ملک
Sayf al-Din Suri
سیف‌ الدین سوری
1146–1149
Malik
ملک
Baha al-Din Sam I
بهاء الدین سام
1149
Malik
ملک
Sultan al-Muazzam
سلطان المعظم
Ala al-Din Husayn
علاء الدین حسین
1149–1161
As independent rulers
Malik
ملک
Sayf al-Din Muhammad
سیف‌ الدین محمد
1161–1163
Ghurids (Ghur & Ghazna). Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad. AH 558–599 AD 1163–1203. Baldat Herat mint. Dated AH 599 (AD 1202–3). Sultan Abul-Fateh
سلطان ابوالفتح
Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad
غیاث‌ الدین محمد
1163–1203
Coin of Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad, AH 599–602 1171–1206 CE Indian coinage (Pagoda) of Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad. Obverse: Lakshmi seated facing. Reverse: śri maha/ra mahama/da sama in Devanagari. Sultan Shahāb-ud-din Muhammad Ghori
سلطان شهاب‌ الدین محمد غوری
Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad
معز الدین محمد
1203–1206
As vassals of the Khwarazmian Empire
Coin of Ghiyath al-Din Mahmud. AH 602–609 1206–1212 CE Sultan
سلطان
Ghiyath al-Din Mahmud
غیاث‌ الدین محمود
1206–1212
Sultan
سلطان
Baha al-Din Sam III
بهاء الدین سام
1212–1213
Sultan
سلطان
Ala al-Din Atsiz
علاء الدین دراست
1213–1214
Sultan
سلطان
Ala al-Din Ali
علاء الدین علی
1214–1215
Khwarazmian conquest

Bamiyan Branch

Coinage Titular Name(s) Personal Name Reign
As independent rulers
Malik
ملک
Fakhr al-Din Masud
فخرالدین مسعود
1152–1163
Ghurids (Bamiyan). Shams al-Din Muhammad. AH 558–588 AD 1163–1192. Malik
ملک
Shams al-Din Muhammad ibn Masud
شمس‌ الدین محمد بن مسعود
1163–1192
Malik
ملک
Abbas ibn Muhammad
عباس بن محمد
1192
Ghurids (Bamiyan). Baha' al-Din Sam. AH 588–602 AD 1192–1206. Wakhsh mint. Malik
ملک
Abul-Mu'ayyid
ابوالمؤید
Baha al-Din Sam II
بهاء الدین سام
1192–1206
As vassal of the Khwarazmian Empire
Coin of Jalal_al-Din_Ali. Malik
ملک
Jalal al-Din Ali
جلال‌ الدین علی
1206–1215
Khwarazmian conquest

Ghurid family tree

Ghurid dynasty family tree
Amir Suri
(9th-century-10th-century)
Muhammad ibn Suri
(10th-century-1011)
Abu Ali ibn Muhammad
(1011–1035)
Shith ibn Muhammad
Abbas ibn Shith
(1035–1060)
Muhammad ibn Abbas
(1060–1080)
Qutb al-din Hasan
(1080–1100)
Izz al-Din Husayn
(1100–1146)
Sayf al-Din Suri
(1146–1149)
Shuja al-Din MuhammadQutb al-Din MuhammadBaha al-Din Sam I
(1149)
Nasir al-Din Muhammad KharnakAla al-Din Husayn
(1149–1161)
Fakhr al-Din Masud
(1152–1163)
Ala al-Din Ali
(1214–1215)
Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad
(1163–1202)
Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad
(1202–1206)
Shams al-Din Muhammad
(1163–1192)
Sayf al-Din Muhammad
(1149–1157)
Ala al-Din Atsiz
(1213–1214)
Abbas ibn Muhammad
(1192)
Baha al-Din Sam II
(1192–1206)
Ghiyath al-Din Mahmud
(1206–1212)
Jalal al-Din Ali
(1206–1215)
Ala al-Din Muhammad
Baha al-Din Sam III
(1212–1213)

See also

Notes

  1. The rise to power of the Ghurids at Ghur, a small isolated area located in the mountain vastness between the Ghaznavid empire and the Seljukids, was an unusual and unexpected development. The area was so remote that till the 11th century, it had remained a pagan enclave surrounded by Muslim principalities. It was converted to Islam in the early part of the 11th century after Mahmud raided it, and left teachers to instruct the Ghurids in the precepts of Islam. Even then it is believed that a variety of Mahayana Buddhism persisted in the area till the end of the century

References

  1. Schwartzberg, Joseph E. (1978). A Historical Atlas of South Asia. Oxford University Press, Digital South Asia Library. p. 147, Map "g".
  2. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 38.
  3. Bosworth, C.E. (1 January 1998). History of Civilizations of Central Asia. UNESCO. pp. 432–433. ISBN 978-92-3-103467-1.
  4. Thomas, David C. (15 May 2018). The Ebb and Flow of the Ghūrid Empire. Sydney University Press. p. 26, Figure I:2. ISBN 978-1-74332-542-1.
  5. Schmidt, Karl J. (20 May 2015). An Atlas and Survey of South Asian History. Routledge. p. 37, Map 16.2. ISBN 978-1-317-47681-8.
  6. History of Civilizations of Central Asia. UNESCO. 1 January 1998. ISBN 978-92-3-103467-1. In 1201 Ghurid troops entered Khurasan and captured Nishapur, Merv, Sarakhs and Tus, reaching as far as Gurgan and Bistam. Kuhistan, a stronghold of the Ismailis, was plundered and all Khurasan was brought temporarily under Ghurid control
  7. ^ Bosworth 2001b, pp. 586–590.
  8. Turkish History and Culture in India: Identity, Art and Transregional Connections. BRILL. 17 August 2020. p. 237. ISBN 978-90-04-43736-4. In 1205, Bakhtīyar Khilji sacked Nudiya, the pre-eminent city of western Bengal and established an Islamic government at Laukhnauti, the capital of the predecessor Sena dynasty. On this occasion, commemorative coins were struck in gold and silver in the name of Muhammad b. Sām
  9. Auer 2021, p. 6.
  10. Firuzkuh: the summer capital of the Ghurids Archived 6 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine, by David Thomas, pg. 18.
  11. The Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-volume set, by Jonathan Bloom, Sheila Blair, pg. 108.
  12. The Development of Persian Culture under the Early Ghaznavids, C.E. Bosworth, Iran, Vol. 6, (1968), 35;;"Like the Ghaznavids whom they supplanted, the Ghurids had their court poets, and these wrote in Persian"
  13. ^ O'Neal 2015.
  14. ^ Satish Chandra, Medieval India:From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206–1526), Part 1, (Har-Anand Publications, 2006), 22.
  15. The Ghurids, K.A. Nizami, History of Civilizations of Central Asia, Vol.4, Part 1, ed. M.S. Asimov and C.E. Bosworth, (Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1999), 178.
  16. Bang, Peter Fibiger; Bayly, C. A.; Scheidel, Walter (2 December 2020). The Oxford World History of Empire: Volume One: The Imperial Experience. Oxford University Press. pp. 92–94. ISBN 978-0-19-977311-4.
  17. Elphinstone, Mountstuart. The History of India. Vol. 1. J. Murray, 1841. Web. 29 April 2010. Link: "...the prevalent and apparently the correct opinion is, that both they and their subjects were Afghans. " & "In the time of Sultan Mahmud it was held, as has been observed, by a prince whom Ferishta calls Mohammed Soory (or Sur) Afghan." p.598-599
  18. A short history of India: and of the frontier states of Afghanistan, Nipal, and Burma, Wheeler, James Talboys Archived 9 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine, (LINK): "The next conqueror after Mahmud who made a name in India, was Muhammad Ghori, the Afghan."
  19. Balfour, Edward. The Cyclopædia of India and of Eastern and Southern Asia, Commercial Industrial, and Scientific: Products of the Mineral, Vegetable, and Animal Kingdoms, Useful Arts and Manufactures. 3rd ed. Vol. 2. London: Bernard Quaritch, 1885. Web. 29 April 2010. Link: "IZ-ud-DIN Husain, the founder of the Ghori dynaasty, was a native of Afghanistan. The origin of the house of Ghor has, however, been much discussed, – the prevailing opinion being that both they and their subjects were an Afghan race. " p.392
  20. ^ M. Longworth Dames; G. Morgenstierne; R. Ghirshman (1999). "AFGHĀNISTĀN". Encyclopaedia of Islam (CD-ROM Edition v. 1.0 ed.). Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV. "... there is no evidence for assuming that the inhabitants of Ghūr were originally Pashto-speaking (cf. Dames, in E I1). If we are to believe the Paṭa Khazāna (see below, iii), the legendary Amīr Karōṝ, grandson of Shansab, (8th century) was a Pashto poet, but this for various reasons is very improbable ..."
  21. Richard Eaton (2000). Essays on Islam and Indian History. Oxford University Press. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-19-565114-0. The dynamics of north Indian politics changed dramatically, however, when the Ghurids, a dynasty of Tajik (eastern Iranian), origina arrived from central Afghanistan towards the end of twelfth century
  22. Encyclopaedia of Islam, "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: "... The Shansabānīs were, like the rest of the Ghūrīs, of eastern Iranian Tājik stock ..."
  23. Wink 2020, p. 78.
  24. Cynthia Talbot, The Last Hindu Emperor: Prithviraj Chauhan and the Indian Past, 1200–2000, (Cambridge University Press, 2016), 36.
  25. Flood, Finbarr B. (20 March 2018). Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter. Princeton University Press. p. 92. ISBN 978-0-691-18074-8.
  26. Avari, Burjor (2013). Islamic Civilization in South Asia: A History of Muslim Power and Presence in the Indian Subcontinent. Routledge. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-415-58061-8.
  27. ^ Wink, André (2010). "The early expansion of Islam in India". In Morgan, David O.; Reid, Anthony (eds.). The New Cambridge History of Islam, Volume 3: The Eastern Islamic World, Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 96. ISBN 978-0-521-85031-5.
  28. Flood, Finbarr Barry (3 May 2009). Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter. Princeton University Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-691-12594-7.
  29. Encyclopaedia of Islam, "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: "... There is nothing to confirm the recent surmise that the Ghūids were Pashto-speaking the Paṭa Khazāna "Treasury of secrets", claims to include Pashto poetry from the Ghūid period, but the significance of this work has not yet been evaluated ..."
  30. ^ Bosworth 2001a, pp. 578–583.
  31. Ghurids, C.E. Bosworth, Encyclopedia of Islam, Vol.2, Ed. Bernard Lewis, C. Pellat and J. Schacht, (E.J.Brill, 1991), 1100.
  32. Bosworth 1968, p. 163.
  33. Mohammad Habib (1992). "THE ASIATIC ENVIRONMENT". In Mohammad Habib; Khaliq Ahmad Nizami (eds.). A Comprehensive History of India: The Delhi Sultanat (A.D. 1206–1526). Vol. 5 (Second ed.). The Indian History Congress / People's Publishing House. p. 44. OCLC 31870180. At this juncture Sultan Ghiyasuddin Ghuri died at Herat on 27 Jamadi I.A H 599 (13 March A.D 1203)
  34. Bosworth 1968, p. 168.
  35. Chandra 2007, p. 73:"Muizzuddin led his last campaign into India in 1206 in order to deal with the Khokhar rebellion. He resorted to large-scale slaughter of the Khokhars and cowed them down. On his way back to Ghazni, he was killed by a Muslim fanatic belonging to a rival sect"
  36. Schwartzberg, Joseph E. (1978). A Historical atlas of South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 37, 147. ISBN 0226742210.
  37. Flood, Finbarr B. (20 March 2018). Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter. Princeton University Press. pp. 115–117. ISBN 978-0-691-18074-8.
  38. Goron, Stan; Goenka, J. P.; Robinson (numismatist.), Michael (2001). The Coins of the Indian Sultanates: Covering the Area of Present-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Munshiram Manoharlal. ISBN 978-81-215-1010-3. Obverse: horseman to left holding a mace, margin with date in Nagari Samvat 1262 Bhadrapada . Reverse : legend in Nagari śrīmat mahamada sāmaḥ . Issued in AD 1204
  39. ^ Jayapalan, N. (2001). History of India. Atlantic Publishers & Distri. pp. 1–3. ISBN 978-81-7156-928-1.
  40. ^ Turkish History and Culture in India: Identity, Art and Transregional Connections. BRILL. 17 August 2020. p. 237. ISBN 978-90-04-43736-4.
  41. ^ Eaton 2019, pp. 39–45.
  42. Asoke Kumar Majumdar (1956). Chaulukyas of Gujarat. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. pp. 131–132. OCLC 4413150.
  43. Chandra 2007, p. 68: "In 1173, Shahabuddin, Muhammad (1173–1206 (also known as Muizzuddin Muhammad bin Sam) ascended the throne at Ghazni, while his elder brother was ruling at Ghur. Proceeding by way of the Gomal pass, Muizzuddin Muhammad conquered Multan and Uchch. In 1178, he attempted to penetrate into Gujarat by marching across the Rajputana desert. But the Gujarat ruler completely routed him in a battle near Mount Abu, and Muizzuddin Muhammad was lucky in escaping alive. He now realised the necessity of creating a suitable base in the Punjab before venturing upon the conquest of India. Accordingly he launched a campaign against the Ghaznavid possessions in the Punjab. By 1190, Muizzuddin Muhammad had conquered Peshawar, Lahore and Sialkot,and was poised fora thrust towards Delhi and the Gangetic doab"
  44. Bosworth 2001a.
  45. ^ Eaton, Richard M. (1993). The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204–1760. Berkeley · Los Angeles · London: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS. p. Chapter 1–2.
  46. Hermann Kulke; Dietmar Rothermund (2004). A History of India. Psychology Press. p. 167. ISBN 978-0-415-32919-4. "The first battle of Tarain was won by the Rajput confederacy led by Prithviraj Chauhan of Ajmer. But when Muhammad of Ghur returned the following year with 10,000 archers on horseback he vanquished Prithviraj and his army
  47. Jayapalan, N. (2001). History of India. Atlantic Publishers & Distri. ISBN 978-81-7156-928-1.
  48. ^ Mohammad Habib (1981). K. A. Nizami (ed.). Politics And Society During The Early Medieval Period Vol. 2. People's Publishing House. p. 116. In the winter of A.D. 1194–1195 Shihabuddin once more marched into Hindustan and invaded the doab. Rai Jaichand moved forward to met him....then description of Chandwar struggle (...) Shihabuddin captured the treasure fort of Asni and then proceeded to Benaras, 'where he converted about thousand idol-temples into house for the Musalmans.
  49. Jayapalan, N. (2001). History of India. Atlantic Publishers & Distri. p. 2. ISBN 978-81-7156-928-1.
  50. Chandra 2007, p. 71: "In 1194, Muizzuddin returned to India. He crossed the Jamuna with 50,000 cavalry and moved towards Kanauj. A hotly contested battle between Muizzuddin and Jaichandra was fought at Chandawar near Kanauj. We are told that Jaichandra had almost carried the day when he was killed by an arrow, and his army was totally defeated. Muizzuddin now moved on to Banaras which was ravaged, a large number of temples there being destroyed"
  51. ^ Asher, Frederick M. (25 February 2020). Sarnath: A Critical History of the Place Where Buddhism Began. Getty Publications. p. 11. ISBN 978-1-60606-616-4. And then, in 1193, Qutb-ud-din Aibek, the military commander of Muhammad of Ghor's army, marched towards Varanasi, where he is said to have destroyed idols in a thousand temples. Sarnath very likely was among the casualties of this invasion, one all too often seen as a Muslim invasion whose primary purpose was iconoclasm. It was of course, like any premodern military invasion, intended to acquire land and wealth
  52. Asher, Frederick M. (25 February 2020). Sarnath: A Critical History of the Place Where Buddhism Began. Getty Publications. p. 74. ISBN 978-1-60606-616-4.
  53. ^ Jayapalan, N. (2001). History of India. Atlantic Publishers & Distri. ISBN 978-81-7156-928-1.
  54. Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, pp. 123–126.
  55. Roy, Himanshu (30 August 2021). Political Thought in Indic Civilization. SAGE Publishing India. p. 6. ISBN 978-93-5479-159-8. After the arrival of Islam, the universities such as Nalanda and Vikramshila were no longer existent. The destruction of Nalanda by Bakhtiyar Khalji was the last nail in this pre-Islamic Indic university, which had survived three major destructions
  56. Koh, Tommy; Singh, Hernaikh (25 November 2020). India on Our Minds: Essays By Tharman Shanmugaratnam And 50 Singaporean Friends of India. World Scientific. p. 91. ISBN 978-981-12-2453-9.
  57. Majumdar, R. C. (1973). History of Mediaeval Bengal. Calcutta: G. Bharadwaj & Co. pp. 1–2. OCLC 1031074. Tradition gives him credit for the conquest of Bengal but as a matter of fact he could not subjugate the greater part of Bengal ... All that Bakhtyār can justly take credit for is that by his conquest of Western and a part of Northern Bengal he laid the foundation of the Muslim State in Bengal. The historians of the 13th century never attributed the conquest of the whole of Bengal to Bakhtyār.
  58. Mehta, Jaswant Lal (1986) . Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India. Vol. I (2nd ed.). Sterling Publishers. pp. 81–82. ISBN 978-81-207-0617-0. OCLC 883279992. The Turkish arms penetrated into Bihar and Bengal, through the enterprising efforts of Ikhtiyaruddin Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji ... he started plundering raids into Bihar and, within four or five years, occupied a large part of it ... Nadia was sacked by the Turks and a few districts of Bengal (Malda, Dinajpur, Murshidabad and Birbhum) were occupied by them ... Bathtiyar Khalji could not retain his hold over Nadia and made Lakhnauti or Gaur as his capital.
  59. Thakur, Amrendra Kumar (1992). India and the Afghans: A study of a neglected region, 1370–1576 A.D. p. 148. ISBN 9788185078687.
  60. K. A. Nizami (1992). "The Early Turkish Sultans of Delhi". In Mohammad Habib; Khaliq Ahmad Nizami (eds.). A Comprehensive History of India: The Delhi Sultanat (A.D. 1206–1526). Vol. 5 (Second ed.). The Indian History Congress / People's Publishing House. p. 201. OCLC 31870180.
  61. Nafziger, George F.; Walton, Mark W. (2003). Islam at War: A History. Praeger Publishers. p. 56. ISBN 9780275981013.
  62. Chandra, Satish (2004). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206-1526) – Part One. Har-Anand Publications. pp. 43–44. ISBN 978-81-241-1064-5.
  63. Satish Chandra (2004). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206-1526) - Part One. Har-Anand Publications. p. 29. ISBN 978-81-241-1064-5.
  64. Bosworth 1968, p. 165.
  65. Ira M. Lapidus, A History of Islamic Societies 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press 2002
  66. Persian Literature in the Safavid Period, Z. Safa, The Cambridge history of Iran: The Timurid and Safavid periods, Vol.6, Ed. Peter Jackson and Laurence Lockhart,(Cambridge University Press, 1986), 951;"...Ghurids and Ghurid mamluks, all of whom established centres in India where poets and writers received ample encouragement.".
  67. Patel, Alka (University of California) (16 November 2017). The Coming of the Mongols. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 19–25. ISBN 978-1-78673-383-2.
  68. Hambly & Asher 1994, pp. 242–250.
  69. Auer 2021, p. 30.
  70. Auer 2021, p. 12.
  71. ^ Avari, Burjor (2013). Islamic Civilization in South Asia: A History of Muslim Power and Presence in the Indian Subcontinent. Routledge. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-415-58061-8.
  72. Eaton 2019, pp. 48–49.

Bibliography

Afghanistan articles
History
By topic
Geography
Demographics
Politics
Economy
Culture
History of Central Asia
Polities
Culture
Archaeology
Southern Russia
Western China
Mongolia
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Uzbekistan
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Afghanistan
Iran
Artifacts
Iran topics
History
Prehistory
Ancient
3400–539 BC
550 BC–AD 224
AD 224–651
Medieval and
early modern
632–1090
977–1432
1370–1925
Modern
1925–1979
Islamic Republic
1979–present
See also
Geography
Politics
General
Councils
Officials
Economy
General
Sectors
State-owned
companies
Places
Society
Demographics
Languages
Peoples
Religion
Other
Culture
Music
Other topics
Categories: