| Revision as of 13:57, 21 March 2023 editCourcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits You have been blocked from editing to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war on Lia Thomas.Tag: Twinkle← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:58, 21 March 2023 edit undoCourcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits →March 2023: note on PAsNext edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| <div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. ] (]) 13:57, 21 March 2023 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | <div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. ] (]) 13:57, 21 March 2023 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | ||
| *This block is also justified based on that lovely personal attack above. Please don't do things like that. ] (]) 13:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:58, 21 March 2023
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Roxy_the_dog. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
| 152 edits | List of common misconceptions |
| 138 edits | Comstock Act of 1873 |
| 126 edits | Nicol Spence Galbraith |
| 107 edits | 2024 Tamil Nadu alcohol poisoning |
| 99 edits | James Alison Glover |
| 45 edits | Source control (respiratory disease) |
| 39 edits | Jenner Medal of the Royal Society of Medicine |
| 33 edits | List of pharmaceutical companies |
| 32 edits | Simone Badal-McCreath |
| 32 edits | Influenza A virus |
These are the articles that have been edited the most within the last seven days. Last updated 26 June 2024 by HotArticlesBot.
sorry I'm just a kid
Roxy I needed help for my school project that's all 41.115.61.4 (talk) 16:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Good luck in your school project, 41.115.61.4 - Troopersho (talk) 21:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Untitled (moved from top)
Hi Roxy, I am very much confused with you reverting back to the content I wrote for the medical research part of turmeric. There was no prior discussion on the talk page and then it was reverted within a few hours. Well, The content I wrote was fully proofread and much-studied content. If you have gone through my reference part, there is well-established research with very positive results concerned with the anticancer, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory parts of turmeric. The articles which were cited are published in high-quality journals belonging to NCBI and Scopus database, Also many of the articles are having a large number of citations. I don't understand even though turmeric is used in everyday life for one or the other medical use, then why it is written as Turmeric is not medically helpful. Any layman would disagree with it. Ayurveda has an immense use of turmeric in its medicines and other therapies. Because it is very clear that turmeric has a very huge medical potential. If you read the literature, there is strong evidence of the anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties of turmeric. According to me the medical research part of turmeric has to be studied well and the statements written has to be corrected. kindly let me know, what is the matter with reverting back the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DWKGKB (talk • contribs) 07:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Have you read WP:MEDRS?. It is the policy regarding the acceptable sourcing requirements for biomedical content on the project. Your sources must meet this requirement, and I'm afraid those are woefully inadequate. - Roxy the dog 08:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
True, but...
Those aren't the kinds of stuff most people are talking about when they complain about bias in wikipedia. Troopersho (talk) 21:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- You would be surprised by what bias people complain about. - Roxy the dog 15:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Own trumpet blowing
I am awarding myself the "edsum of the day" award for this one. - Roxy the dog 15:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- I have independently audited this award and concur. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Three years! |
|---|
... concur also --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Lia Thomas penis exposure
Just wanted to let you know that I found a new source for it that is not Fox News. . Rodistron1 (talk) 01:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
March 2023
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Misplaced Pages about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Lia Thomas. Hi Roxy the dog, the poorly-sourced controversial information is disputed on WP:BLP grounds, not just Fox News, and I am sorry you continue to try to add it. I have removed it again per WP:BLPRESTORE. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 11:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- You are a worthless piece of shite liar, who is officially banned from this page. I hope you choke on your lies. -Roxy the dog 13:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- This block is also justified based on that lovely personal attack above. Please don't do things like that. Courcelles (talk) 13:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)