| Revision as of 02:31, 13 March 2007 editD323P (talk | contribs)210 edits Deleted material restored. Deletions by Peteforsyth made without discussion, in clear violation of WP policy← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:39, 13 March 2007 edit undoDavid Shankbone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,979 edits There are four editors reverting D323P, who is in danger of violating the 3RR and being blocked; removed all websites in criticism and rebuttal sectionsNext edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| The lawsuit is described by Franken in a ]-only chapter of ''Lies'' entitled "I Win". | The lawsuit is described by Franken in a ]-only chapter of ''Lies'' entitled "I Win". | ||
| ==Criticisms== | |||
| A number of criticisms have been made of the book, including those by Frankenlies.com,<ref>]</ref> operated by Dave Pierre, a contributor to NewsBusters, operated by the ] ]. Sourced rebuttals are cataloged at the site. Among Frankenlies.com's criticisms: | |||
| :On pages 110-111 of the book (hardcover, 1st edition), Franken claims that President Clinton "thwarted" "plots to kill the Pope and blow up twelve U.S. jetliners simultaneously." On page 121, he asserts a similar claim: that Clinton thwarted a plot "to hijack an American commercial plane and crash it into CIA headquarters." However, a Congressional joint inquiry, declassified in 2003, concluded these plots "were thwarted by Philippine police when a fire erupted in an apartment where was preparing explosives." <ref> Retrieved February 25, 2007.</ref>The actions by Philippine police are detailed and accounted over a number of chapters in a book by former ] reporter ], `'1000 Years For Revenge.'` In the book, Lance interviews members of the Philippine police responsible for thwarting the plots. The work by Philippine police in stopping the plots was also researched and written about by investigator ] in a book called, ''Why America Slept''.<ref></ref> | |||
| :In passages about reported vandalism at the White House complex during the transition of the Clinton and Bush administrations in 2000-2001, Franken wrote, "Of course, none of this horrible vandalism actually occurred" (page 153). However, a 217-page report by the ] concluded the opposite: "Damage, theft, vandalism, and pranks occurred in the White House complex during the 2001 presidential transition. Incidents such as the removal of keys from computer keyboards; the theft of various items; the leaving of certain voice mail messages, signs, and written messages; and the placing of glue on desk drawers clearly were intentional acts." <ref> United States General Accounting Office, "The White House: Allegations of Damage During the 2001 Presidential Transition," June 2002, p. 19 (page 22 of the pdf file).] Retrieved February 25, 2007.</ref><ref></ref> | |||
| :In a book review of Franken's book in the Washington newspaper ], reviewer Mary Lynn F. Jones, a fan of Franken's previous works, opined, "Franken's tendency to mix fact with fiction left me wondering sometimes what was true and what wasn't." <ref> Retieved February25, 2007.</ref> As an example, she cited a passage in Franken's book in which he wrote that former Bush foreign policy advisor ] "bolted" from a Senate hearing and " over veteran reporter ], breaking her hip and jaw" (page 218). In the ] version of ''Lies'', Franken clarified the passage with a footnote saying, "the Helen Thomas thing is a joke" (page 227 of the paperback).<ref></ref> | |||
| Also, a ] article by ] ], of the ] ], challenged Franken's book on its facts. <ref></ref>. Lowry noted that Franken had claimed on page 115 of his book that the Clinton administration had "far-reaching plan" to eliminate al Qaeda and that the Clinton team "decided to turn over the plan to the Bush administration to carry out." However, Lowry wrote that Sandy Berger testified in front of Congress on September 19, 2002, and stated, "here was no war plan that we turned over to the Bush administration during the transition. And the reports of that are just incorrect."<ref></ref> | |||
| ===Charges of Plagiarism=== | |||
| In a 2005 book called ''Pants on Fire'', released by the conservative organization ], writer Alan Skorski claimed that Franken plagiarized portions of ''Lies and the Lying Liars'' from a 2001 report on the ] by the ] group ]. An example by Skorski: | |||
| :: FAIR, July/August 2001: by Seth Ackerman, writing about '']'': | |||
| ::: Even Fox's "left-right" debate show, Hannity & Colmes--whose Crossfire-style format virtually imposes numerical equality between conservatives and "liberals"--can't shake the impression of resembling a Harlem Globetrotters game ... | |||
| :: Al Franken, page 63 (hardcover, 1st edition): | |||
| ::: For those of you unfamiliar with the Hannity and Colmes dynamic, it's a conservative-versus-liberal talking head show, kind of a combination between Crossfire and a Harlem Globetrotters game. | |||
| The passage is Franken's book does not have ], and FAIR's report is not cited in the "Notes and Sources" section at the back of the book. Franken largely composed the book during a ] at ]. | |||
| In all, Mr. Skorski believes to have cited a total of ten passages in Franken's book which bear "striking similarities" to the FAIR report.<ref>http://www.frankenlies.com/lies/plagiarism.htm Frankenlies.com: Addendum G: Charges of Plagiarism Against Al Franken</ref> | |||
| ==Editions== | ==Editions== | ||
| Line 83: | Line 61: | ||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
| <references/> | <references/> | ||
| ==External links== | |||
| === Rebuttals === | |||
| * | |||
| * -- General criticism of Franken | |||
| === Counter-rebuttals === | |||
| * | |||
| * - Challenges purported smears and criticism of Franken | |||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 02:39, 13 March 2007
 | |
| Author | Al Franken |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Subject | American politics/Conservatism |
| Genre | Political satire |
| Publisher | E.P. Dutton |
| Publication date | 2003 |
| Media type | Hardcover/paperback |
| Preceded by | Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot and Other Observations |
| Followed by | The Truth (with jokes) |
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right is a book of political commentary and satire by comedian and political commentator Al Franken, published in 2003 by Dutton, a subsidiary in the Penguin Group. It was written with the help of a volunteer group of fourteen Harvard students known as "Team Franken." The book's subtitle is an ironic parody of Fox News' tagline "Fair and Balanced". Fox sued Franken over the use of the phrase in a short-lived lawsuit that is frequently credited with increasing the sales of the book.
Summary
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them is one of several books published in 2003 written by American liberals challenging the viewpoints of American conservatives such as Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, and Bill O'Reilly. These liberal-oriented books by Franken and fellow authors such as Joe Conason, Michael Moore and Jim Hightower have been described by columnist Molly Ivins as the Great Liberal Backlash of 2003.
Lies largely targets prominent Republicans and conservatives, highlighting documentable inaccuracies in their claims. A significant portion of the book is devoted to comparisons between President George W. Bush and former President Bill Clinton regarding their economic, environmental, and military policies. Franken also criticizes several pundits, especially those he believes to be the most dishonest, including Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity.
In Lies, Franken divides American media into two groups: the mainstream media, which attempts to be objective, and the right-wing media, which does not.
In his book, Franken writes that "The mainstream media does not have a liberal bias, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post, TIME, Newsweek, and the rest at least try to be fair." Franken notes that the mainstream media do have biases, including towards sensationalism, the easy story, and soft news.
Franken makes this distinction in an effort to debunk the claim that the mainstream American media are liberally biased. Franken believe that the claim of media "liberal bias" is a myth used by conservative politicians. Propagating this myth, Franken asserts, serves three functions. First, it serves to create fear in the part of mainstream media outlets that they will be accused of having a liberal bias if they discuss issues that conservatives don't want them to. Second, it allows conservatives to deny or dismiss reports in the mainstream media, regardless of whether they are true, because they have discredited the source already. Third, attacking the liberal media can be effective at increasing conservative voter turnout.
The book criticizes several conservative authors and pundits by pointing out factual inaccuracies and deceptive statements they have made. Franken criticizes Ann Coulter on a number of points related to what Franken alleges as abuses or violations of journalistic ethics in her book Slander. In addition to accusing her of lying, Franken accuses Coulter of deliberately misusing citations in order to further a misleading political agenda. Coulter frequently said that Slander has "720 footnotes" when she was challenged on the accuracy of statements within the book. Franken points out that merely having 720 citations makes readers less likely to actually check them. He also notes that Coulter's citations are not footnotes in a literal sense, but rather endnotes, which are located at the end of the book rather than the foot of the page, which he says, readers are far less likely to refer to. Franken also cites examples where Coulter misuses her citations to attribute offensive our outlandish statements to people who did not make them.
Franken also criticizes former CBS reporter Bernard Goldberg for what he claims is selective decontextualized quoting, and allegedly dishonest material in his book Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News. Franken recounts an incident on Phil Donahue's talk show on MSNBC when he confronted Goldberg about a misleading quote attributed to NBC anchor and commentator John Chancellor.
The book also criticizes Bill O'Reilly, with whom Al Franken has a public feud. Franken accuses O'Reilly of being a serial and pathological liar, recounting multiple controversies relating to O'Reilly, including O'Reilly's inaccurate statements regarding Peabody awards, his heated interview with Jeremy Glick, and his successful boycott of Pepsi for hiring rap artist Ludacris. Franken pokes fun at O'Reilly for moralizing about the sexually explicit and violent themes of Ludacris's songs despite having himself written a book, Those Who Trespass, which contains violent and sexual imagery and profanity. Franken also recounts his heated confrontation with O'Reilly at BookExpo America 2003, seen on C-SPAN.
Publicity
- Main article: Fox v. Franken
FOX News sought damages from Franken, claiming in its lawsuit that the book's subtitle violated its alleged trademark rights in the phrase "Fair and Balanced". The lawsuit was dismissed, and the attempt backfired on FOX News in that it provided Franken with free publicity just as the book was launched. "The book was originally scheduled to be released Sept. 22 but made available Aug. 21," according to its publisher. "We sped up the release because of tremendous demand for the book, generated by recent events."
In the lawsuit, Fox described Franken as "intoxicated or deranged" as well as "shrill and unstable." In response, Franken joked that he had trademarked the word "funny", and that Fox had infringed his intellectual property rights by characterizing him as "unfunny." The publicity resulting from the lawsuit propelled Franken's as-of-then-unreleased book to the #1 sales position on Amazon.com's best-seller list.
On August 22, 2003, U.S. District Judge Denny Chin denied Fox's request for an injunction to block the publication of Franken's book, characterizing the network's claim as "wholly without merit, both factually and legally." During the judge's questioning, spectators in the court's gallery frequently laughed at Fox's case. Franken later joked, "Usually when you say someone was literally laughed out of court, you mean they were figuratively laughed out of court, but Fox was literally laughed out of court." Three days later, Fox filed papers to drop its lawsuit.
The lawsuit is described by Franken in a paperback-only chapter of Lies entitled "I Win".
Editions
- ISBN 0-525-94764-7 (hardcover, 2003)
- ISBN 0-452-28521-6
See also
References
- Saulny, Susan (August 23, 2003). "In Courtroom, Laughter at Fox and a Victory for Al Franken". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved 2005-10-05.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: year (link) - http://progressive.stanford.edu/2003.11_franken.html