| Revision as of 23:25, 12 March 2007 editWeggie (talk | contribs)7,339 edits →Oops: remove - save this for another time← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:06, 13 March 2007 edit undoOne Night In Hackney (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,879 edits →Oops: No problem, plus UDA questionNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| Lol - cheers it's getting late :0). | Lol - cheers it's getting late :0). | ||
| :No problem. Can I get some input on the ] please? I'm not keen on being bold and making a decision one way or the other in terms of combined/seperate figures. Thanks. <font face="Verdana">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 07:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:06, 13 March 2007
 Archives |
Dude - you owe me a new keyboard! That 'pic of the month' is only hilarious :-) Yes - down with all those forddin' games, I say!! - Alison 00:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Guildford Will post source later (Time Bomb by Johnathan somethingorother). Regards.GiollaUidir 19:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds good Ta Weggie 19:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Your edit summaries
I have noticed recently that your edit summaries are getting a little close to the bone. I wonder if you wouldnt mind giving it a rest. regards--Vintagekits 19:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Welcome back after your ban my friend Weggie 19:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've been back a while. Hope you are having a good day. I have also noticed that you have become involed with some of the "lock step crew" as Mr Darcy calls them.--Vintagekits 19:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Leave me out of the bickering thanks. I prefer to stick to constructive activity Weggie 11:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've been back a while. Hope you are having a good day. I have also noticed that you have become involed with some of the "lock step crew" as Mr Darcy calls them.--Vintagekits 19:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Welcome back after your ban my friend Weggie 19:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Chronology of Continuity IRA actions
If you get a minute can you take a look at this for me please, as you're generally good at finding sources for things I can't. There's only a few I can't source, and I'm thinking about removing the July 1997 New Barnsley attack as the Provisionals claimed that. Thanks. One Night In Hackney303 18:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll remove those then. One Night In Hackney303 17:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Dessie O'Hare
I have removed the NPOV tag, as you have given no explanation on the talk page for this, as the tag stipulates. An edit summary is not the way to do this, and I didn't understand what you meant in it anyway. Tyrenius 02:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Oops
I'll put that down to an honest mistake rather than a POV edit, I moved it to the right place for you anyway. One Night In Hackney303 23:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Lol - cheers it's getting late :0).
- No problem. Can I get some input on the UDA talk page please? I'm not keen on being bold and making a decision one way or the other in terms of combined/seperate figures. Thanks. One Night In Hackney303 07:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)