| Revision as of 14:31, 13 March 2007 editHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 edits spelling← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:43, 13 March 2007 edit undoLoomis51 (talk | contribs)4,197 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| I'm afraid that this black box might start giving me nightmares...too many excellent editors and administrators are leaving it as their last will and testament. Sorry to see you go, Hipocrite. --] 22:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC) | I'm afraid that this black box might start giving me nightmares...too many excellent editors and administrators are leaving it as their last will and testament. Sorry to see you go, Hipocrite. --] 22:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| : I cannot and willnot support an encyclopedia that empowers false information, defends people who are there to misinform and is little more than a social experiment. See comments by ], especially | |||
| It won't get better if you leave...it will only get worse...hope you reconsider.--] 06:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | It won't get better if you leave...it will only get worse...hope you reconsider.--] 06:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| : Not interested in it getting better, honestly. ] - ] 14:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I am very sorry to see you go. ] 07:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | I am very sorry to see you go. ] 07:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| : I am truly sorry to leave. ] - ] 14:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Just noticed. Hopefully, like last time, you'll resume when rested. Either that, or get the energizer<sup><small>TM</small></sup> batteries. ] ] 07:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | Just noticed. Hopefully, like last time, you'll resume when rested. Either that, or get the energizer<sup><small>TM</small></sup> batteries. ] ] 07:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| : Not this time, I don't think. I might make some alternate account to edit finance articles and revert vandalism, but the mass of articles here is basically unwashed, because of the general spinelessness. See recent arbitration near-decision blessing ]. ] - ] 14:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Yet another cop-out. First Sam Clark, now you. Despite your deeply offensive actions and remarks, I'm always dissapointed when a user "retires", only because he can't cope with and learn from justified criticism. You acted rather unfairly toward me, and now you run away, depriving me of my right to state my defence. Pure cowardice. Please come back and explain your actions, and perhaps we'll all come to some sort of mutual understanding. However running away from criticism as you have, hipocrite, is a rather cowardly act, one for which Is truly dissapointing. ] 03:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Who the fuck are you? ] - ] 14:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Holy crap, man! Hipocrite, if you weren't "retired", you'd be banned anyways! | |||
| ::Before you "retired", you were already getting called out for uncivil practices, but is outright inexcusable. You '''never''' have the option of calling editors a 'douchebag' (even if you spell it 'dooshbag'). ] 14:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Who the fuck are you? ] - ] 14:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:43, 13 March 2007
R E T I R E D
I'm afraid that this black box might start giving me nightmares...too many excellent editors and administrators are leaving it as their last will and testament. Sorry to see you go, Hipocrite. --Iamunknown 22:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
It won't get better if you leave...it will only get worse...hope you reconsider.--MONGO 06:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I am very sorry to see you go. Kyaa the Catlord 07:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Just noticed. Hopefully, like last time, you'll resume when rested. Either that, or get the energizer batteries. David D. (Talk) 07:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC)