Misplaced Pages

Talk:Revolution of Dignity: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:52, 15 April 2023 editCzello (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers41,325 edits Requested move 13 April 2023: I'm going to WP:BOLDly close this given that, per WP:SNOW, the "issue has a snowball's chance in hell of being accepted".← Previous edit Revision as of 06:26, 16 April 2023 edit undoTankDude2000 (talk | contribs)328 edits Better title: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit New topicNext edit →
Line 111: Line 111:
*'''Close''' had an RM less than a month ago and nothing has changed since then. – ] (]) 05:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC) *'''Close''' had an RM less than a month ago and nothing has changed since then. – ] (]) 05:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
{{archivebottom}} {{archivebottom}}

== Better title ==

== Requested move 16 April 2023 ==

{{requested move/dated|Ukrainian Revolution of Dignity}}

] → {{no redirect|Ukrainian Revolution of Dignity}} – As the Syrian and Yemeni revolutions now have “Dignity” in their titles, I suggest we add “Ukrainian” in this page’s title to distinguish itself from the other Revolutions of Dignity. ] (]) 06:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:26, 16 April 2023

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Revolution of Dignity article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
In the newsNews items involving this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "In the news" column on February 19, 2014, and February 23, 2014.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUkraine High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Section sizes
Section size for Revolution of Dignity (37 sections)
Section name Byte
count
Section
total
(Top) 27,429 27,429
Prelude 8,307 8,307
Overview 13,130 13,130
Detailed timeline 63 106,751
18 February 2014 23 23,862
Protest march and initial clashes 15,735 15,735
Attack on Maidan 4,497 4,497
Opposition leaders meeting with Yanukovych 3,607 3,607
19 February 12,114 12,114
20 February 17,660 36,809
Diplomatic efforts 5,537 5,537
Ukrainian political developments 13,612 13,612
21 February 5,200 20,484
Agreement on settlement of political crisis 7,380 7,380
Agreement aftermath 7,904 7,904
Removal of Yanukovych 6,884 13,419
Disappearance and prosecution 6,535 6,535
Aftermath 15 54,769
New government 10,891 10,891
Juridical developments 4,025 4,025
Yanukovych press conference and Russian response 4,002 4,002
Ban on Russian state TV 1,014 1,014
Lustration 3,222 3,222
Berkut dissolved 2,732 2,732
Protests against the revolution 14,135 14,135
Russian occupation of Crimea 2,043 2,043
Destruction of Soviet monuments 3,853 3,853
Sports 5,203 5,203
Public opinion 575 575
Signing of the EU Association Agreement 2,098 2,098
Suicides of former officials 961 961
Casualties 1,466 1,466
Russian involvement 7,618 11,871
Russian propaganda 4,253 4,253
See also 53 53
Notes 39 39
References 966 966
Total 224,781 224,781
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

Requested move 3/21/2023

Revolution of DignityUkrainian Revolution of 2014 – Per WP:COMMONNAME. 'Revolution of Dignity' is a propaganda term and is not what most of the English-speaking world would refer to the revolution as. The current title is less descriptive and brings serious NPOV concerns. One of the previous reasons for support was "even though it's not the common name in English it's a good natural dab" - another NPOV comment. Furthermore, such a title follows the general naming convention for revolutions. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 22:42, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

@LegalSmeagolian: Please follow the correct procedures for requested moves, WP:RM. BTW: Maybe you shouldn't call a term used by a Harvard historian (Serhii Plokhy, see my comment in one of the two discussions on the subject above) a "propaganda term". Rsk6400 (talk) 05:50, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Oops fixing now. Thanks. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 14:56, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 22 March 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 20:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)


Revolution of DignityUkrainian Revolution of 2014 – Revolution of Dignity → Ukrainian Revolution of 2014 – Per WP:COMMONNAME. 'Revolution of Dignity' is a propaganda term and is not what most of the English-speaking world would refer to the revolution as. The current title is less descriptive and brings serious NPOV concerns. One of the previous reasons for support was "even though it's not the common name in English it's a good natural dab" - another NPOV comment. Furthermore, such a title follows the general naming convention for revolutions. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 14:58, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

  • Strong oppose The name of this page has been discussed many times (see header), and this is a waste of time. Serhii Plokhy, The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine, which is one of the most popular scholarly works on Ukrainian history, simply calls it "Revolution of Dignity" on pages 339, 341, 342, 352, 353, and in the index. Since Plokhy is a history professor at Harvard University, we should not call our title "a propaganda term". Rsk6400 (talk) 15:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    I agree with you since this is obviously a common name, but you should rethink your insinuation that professors at Harvard can never spread propaganda. Festucalextalk 16:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    Are you saying Plokhy spreads propaganda? That’s wrong. Or just discussing philosophical principals for the sake of discussion? Either way, the comment is unconstructive.  —Michael Z. 23:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
    Harvard professors are not immune to bias, nor above criticism. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 18:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Oppose since this is the English WP:COMMONNAME, despite being, admittedly, a flagrantly biased term. This term's commonality can be traced to the fact that most of the English-speaking world supports the post-Maidan Ukrainian state for geopolitical reasons that are irrelevant to this move request. I, however, would consider supporting a move to Maidan Revolution. Festucalextalk 17:09, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  • oppose no evidence provided that 'Ukrainian Revolution of 2014' is the common name or that Revolution of Dignity is a 'propaganda term'. Maidan Revolution should probable redirect to the wider Euromaidanblindlynx 18:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    Hey, this you? I think it would be dishonest to say that the term "Revolution of Dignity" is not propagandizing events, as it implies the whole thing was dignified. While, in my opinion, it was necessary for the Ukranian people, it was a very chaotic situation that heavily relied on far-right paramilitaries. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 18:29, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    wow i supported the move a to this title a few years ago you really got me there. A few hundred far right crazies in protests of hundreds of thousands is hardly a heavy reliance—blindlynx 18:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    Those people were some of the heavy lifters of the protests, for better or worse. And you supported the move and remarked that it wasn't the common name. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 19:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    LegalSmeagolian, I read two academic books on Ukrainian history, both recent enough to cover the Maidan events (Plokhy and Andreas Kappeler). Neither supports the Russian narrative of strong influence by "far-right paramilitaries". Either present RS or stop repeating that piece of disinformation. Rsk6400 (talk) 19:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    I don't wish to overstate their role, but they were certainly a contributing factor. They barely had any influence on the new government, but in terms of the actual protests themselves, they were incredibly active and participatory. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 19:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    You realize overstating there role is decidedly propaganda right? But it seems that Revolution of dignity is the current common name, , , blindlynx 19:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    Yet you brought it up when it isn't relevant to this move. I'm sorry but the the far right being brought up just because we're talking about Ukraine when it has precious little to do with the specific topic is exactly what i mean by overstating. Moreover this paper is very careful not to make inferences about influence but just talks about visibility—blindlynx 20:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    That's not true, the paper also talks about real participation in the protests. Additionally, I never stated that they had a strong influence on the resulting government, rather that they were a major participant of the protests/revolution. Again, I think the participation of far-right movements makes the term "Dignity" inaccurate, and hence the article should go with a non-biased non-glorifying title. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 21:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    It's not worth getting into a methodological debate about media analyses. You need to back up the claim that 'dignity' glorifies the far-right rather than describes Ukrainians fight for anti-imperialism and meaningful self-determination—blindlynx 21:45, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    (i didn't mean to present it a binary, there's obviously nuance, sorry) —blindlynx 21:48, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Oppose and WP:SNOW close per what everyone else has said. WP:COMMONNAME applies. — Czello 19:36, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
    I think it is pretty clear from multiple topic discussions above that the current name is contentious, with @ZeroXero's comment in the '"Revolution of dignity" is a propaganda term' discussion being particularly compelling. Therefore a WP:SNOW. I think it would be wise to hear from a wide variety of Misplaced Pages editors discussing the title and various options before even considering a close. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 20:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
    It may or may not be a "propaganda" term, but it's still the WP:COMMONNAME. I suggested a snow close as every comment so far is opposed to a rename, and I can't see that changing. — Czello 14:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose and WP:SNOW close per responses from fellow Wikipedians. – Treetoes023 (talk) 00:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Oppose. No evidence for the COMMONNAME assertion. Discussion makes it clear this is an attempt to WP:right great wrongs by editors who don’t want to allow Ukrainians something with dignity and play up right-wing “paramilitaries” as an excuse.  —Michael Z. 00:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
    I don't think your assertion that this is WP:right great wrongsis very civil. I don't have any qualms with the Ukrainian people, I support Ukraine in its defense against Russian aggression, and I think the 2014 Revolution was a positive for Ukraine as a whole. I have just not heard this term for these events common English parlance, and I think there should be a bit of nuance on how we describe historic events. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 20:08, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
    For the third time: One of the most respected experts on Ukrainian history uses the term on a lot pages (which I listed above) and in the index of his book. For the first time: That you started this discussion doesn't mean that you have to reply to each and every contribution here. Rsk6400 (talk) 20:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
    I think it is appropriate to respectfully reply to a claim that I am attempting to "right great wrongs." LegalSmeagolian (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Support I wouldn’t call the “Revolution of Dignity” a propaganda term, but the title “Ukrainian Revolution of 2014” seems more informative and easier to find. Even “Maidan Revolution” works! I ignore color revolutions on this subject. They are ment to have different titles! TankDude2000 (talk) 18:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

current name seems to insult Syria

The 2011 Syrian Revolution demoted to the obscure corners of Revolution of Dignity (disambiguation) is also called the "Revolution of Dignity". Notable voices like Abdeljelil Temimi and Mohamed-Salah Omri have referred to it this way. I worry about racism and recentism giving rise to having Ukraine monopolize this phrase. Why are whites in Ukraine more deserving of "dignity" than the Arab Spring?

I think the only fair way to do this would be to call them Syria revolution of dignity and Ukraine revolution of dignity.

That way the countries and their dignified revolutions would be treated equally. LichCake (talk) 03:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

You could simply change the title on the infobox on the “Syrian Revolution of Dignity” page if you want. I suggest that we change the title from “Revolution of Dignity” to “Ukrainian revolution of 2014”. TankDude2000 (talk) 18:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 April 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
TankDude2000 (talk) 11:20, 13 April 2023 (UTC) Starting on 18 February Euromaidan activists occupied regional state administration (RSA) buildings in several oblasts (regions). -> Since 18 February, Euromaidan activists started occupying regional state administration (RSA) buildings in several oblasts.
 Question: why? M.Bitton (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 Not done: it's not clear why you want to make this change, and it does not appear to have consensus. Please discuss before making a new request, which should be of the form "please change X to Y". Thank you. Ivanvector (/Edits) 18:56, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 13 April 2023

(non-admin closure) WP:SNOW close. Too soon after the last move request and no arguments have been put forth that address the points raised last time. — Czello 07:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Revolution of DignityUkrainian Revolution of 2014 – Most revolutions that may have “dignity” in their titles are not shown like this. For example: the Tunisian Revolution page may be called “Tunisian Revolution of Dignity”, but it is not shown like that on wikipedia. The title “Revolution of Dignity” may be used for more revolutions, so it would create a confusion. TankDude2000 (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

@TankDude2000: No, this is disruptive. The last move discussion has been closed just two weeks ago. I removed the template, so that the robot will not list the discussion anywhere. Rsk6400 (talk) 18:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Bro, I was stating another reason. Stop targeting new users! TankDude2000 (talk) 19:03, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
No one's targeting you. Nonetheless, ultimately the last discussion demonstrated that WP:COMMONNAME is a major factor here, which is why the name shouldn't change. As for possible confusion with other similarly-named revolutions, the top of the article links to Revolution of Dignity (disambiguation) for clarity. — Czello 19:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
What was the tally of media outlets who began calling it that and how did that change over time? Just curious if it was a term popular back in 2014 or in later years. LichCake (talk) 01:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
information Administrator note: I've restored the move template: it was not appropriate for an involved participant to shut down the discussion. This is not a rehash of the previous discussion, new arguments have been presented. If you would like to propose a moratorium on new move requests then please do so; there being no such moratorium as far as I can tell, this discussion proceeds. Ivanvector (/Edits) 18:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks! TankDude2000 (talk) 19:14, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Also, my comment is not an endorsement of the request. If I have an opinion I will comment later. Ivanvector (/Edits) 19:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Better title

Requested move 16 April 2023

It has been proposed in this section that Revolution of Dignity be renamed and moved to Ukrainian Revolution of Dignity.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.


Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current logtarget logdirect move

Revolution of DignityUkrainian Revolution of Dignity – As the Syrian and Yemeni revolutions now have “Dignity” in their titles, I suggest we add “Ukrainian” in this page’s title to distinguish itself from the other Revolutions of Dignity. TankDude2000 (talk) 06:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Categories: