Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 13:36, 16 April 2023

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

"an" before "h"

Hello! I see you're editing 'an's before 'H' words. Just a reminder that if the H is not silent, it is just 'a' not 'an'. Your edits at Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge for the word "hostage" are in error, because "hostage" has a non-silent consonant. Leitmotiv (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Leitmotiv: The form of indefinite article is governed by the displayed text, not by the invisible wikilinked text. It's "an FBI...", not "a FBI...". –Austronesier (talk) 21:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Missed that! thanks Leitmotiv (talk) 22:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

3rd opinion

With this I notify you that I mentioned our dispute at the "3O". See here for more. Mark. PaloAlto (talk) 21:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Explain to me on talk page

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Golden_Horde

The 2016 is only a hypothesis and it says " Considering the historical, archaeological, physical anthropological, and molecular archaeological evidence obtained, it seems most likely that the Tavan Tolgoi bodies are members of Genghis Khan’s Golden family, including the lineage of bekis, Genghis Khan’s female lineage, and their female successors who controlled Eastern Mongolia in the early Mongolian era instead of guregens of the Ongud clan, or the lineage of khans, Genghis Khan’s male lineage, who married females of the Hongirad clan, including Genghis Khan’s grandmother, mother, chief wife, and some daughters-in-law. "

The author even suggest that it is the female lineage of Genghis Khan that is related to Tavan Tolgoi. Gemmaso (talk) 20:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your not making any sense to me. You said " Unnecessary edit, study specifically states: "it seems most likely that the Tavan Tolgoi bodies are members of Genghis Khan’s Golden family, including the lineage of bekis, Genghis Khan’s female lineage, and their female successors who controlled Eastern Mongolia in the early Mongolian era ***instead of guregens of the Ongud clan***, or the lineage of khans, Genghis Khan’s male lineage, who married females of the Hongirad clan"

How is this unnecessary when the way you edited makes not mention of the Tavan Tolgoi bodies were possibly only maternally related to the female lineage of Genghis Khan family.Gemmaso (talk) 21:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

I had replied

Reply back. The way you edited make no mention that the study also claims that it is only maternally related to Genghis Khan, not paternal. You claiming Golden Horde and Golden family R1b being Genghis Khan related? Your basically making a bold claim that the Khans were R1b. Also let me remind you Batu Khan founder of Golden Horde, was suspected by Genghis Khan not to be his child, but of other men when Borte was help captive. https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Golden_Horde Gemmaso (talk) 22:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

I suggest you reply red hair talk page. You reverted the fake source. It says light colered, not red. Since when is it officially confirmed that Odegei Khan have red hair when there isn't a physical description of him with red hair. You used secondary language blog as a source and from Rashid al Din to claim he has red hair but those are unreliable as everyone knows.Gemmaso (talk) 23:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Warning: 3rr rule

Your recent editing history at Red hair shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gemmaso (talk • contribs) 02:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Native Americans obvious west eurasian admixture Y-DNA R and mtDNA X

WHo ever edited the page wants to remove all west eurasian admixture of Native American. The Native Americans have the highest percentage of ANE, Ancient North Eurasian

R1b in Native Americans are no doubt related with West Eurasian or ANE Mal'ta boy

Haplogroup X (mtDNA) Haplogroup X is a human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplogroup. It is found in America, Europe, Western Asia, North Africa, and the Horn of Africa.

It is found in Kennewick Man , his mtDNA is X

WHY IS THIS REMOVED?

A 2013 study in Nature reported that DNA found in the 24,000-year-old remains of a young boy from the archaeological Mal'ta-Buret' culture suggest that up to one-third of Indigenous Americans' ancestry can be traced back to western Eurasians, who may have "had a more north-easterly distribution 24,000 years ago than commonly thought" "We estimate that 14 to 38 percent of Indigenous American ancestry may originate through gene flow from this ancient population," the authors wrote. Professor Kelly Graf said,

"Our findings are significant at two levels. First, it shows that Upper Paleolithic Siberians came from a cosmopolitan population of early modern humans that spread out of Africa to Europe and Central and South Asia. Second, skeletons like Buhl Woman with phenotypic traits atypical of modern-day Indigenous Americans can be explained as having a direct historical connection to Upper Paleolithic Siberia."

A route through Beringia is seen as more likely than the Solutrean hypothesis. An abstract in a 2012 issue of the "American Journal of Physical Anthropology" states that "The similarities in ages and geographical distributions for C4c and the previously analyzed X2a lineage provide support to the scenario of a dual origin for Paleo-Indigenous Americans. Taking into account that C4c is deeply rooted in the Asian portion of the mtDNA phylogeny and is indubitably of Asian origin, the finding that C4c and X2a are characterized by parallel genetic histories definitively dismisses the controversial hypothesis of an Atlantic glacial entry route into North America." Gemmaso (talk) 13:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

1. ^ Raghavan, Maanasa; Skoglund, Pontus; Graf, Kelly E.; et al. (January 2014). "Upper Palaeolithic Siberian genome reveals dual ancestry of Native Americans". Nature. 505 (7481): 87–91. Bibcode:2014Natur.505...87R. doi:10.1038/nature12736. PMC 4105016. PMID 24256729.
2. Kashani, Baharak Hooshiar; Perego, Ugo A.; Olivieri, Anna; et al. (January 2012). "Mitochondrial haplogroup C4c: A rare lineage entering America through the ice-free corridor?". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 147 (1): 35–39. doi:10.1002/ajpa.21614. PMID 22024980.