| Revision as of 01:01, 19 April 2023 editMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,095 edits →afd: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:50, 19 April 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,657 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:MuZemike/Archive 11) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| {{User:MuZemike/Talkheader}} | {{User:MuZemike/Talkheader}} | ||
| == Page Amir Mohammad Nekounam == | |||
| Hi,I have a request to remove the tags from Amir Mohammad Nekounam's page | |||
| Reason: | |||
| I have added credible sources to Amir Mohammad Nekounam's page in the past few days ] (]) 16:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::Not how it works. Please comment at ], as been pointed out to you several times. Continual removing of the tags from the page may result in your block from an admin. --] 16:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| Please agree with me because I have added the desired resources and I do not know where the problem is and so I removed the tags but now I ask you to remove the tags according to the available resources ] (]) 16:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::Again, that's not how the process works. Please reread the comment I just made above and comment in the deletion discussion there. --] 16:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Church of Singapore == | |||
| Thanks for helping out at ], but, well, the one that closed the AfD as "speedy keep" is the article creator, not the nom or an uninvolved editor. They have done this twice, and have also removed the AFD notice from the article repeatedly. I don't want to keep edit warring over it, better to let someone uninvolved handle it. ] (]) 12:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, didn't see that. I was just trying to fix the AfD close so that it didn't affect the rest of the discussions on ]. --] 12:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | == Precious anniversary == | ||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Two}} | {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Two}} | ||
Revision as of 04:50, 19 April 2023
Credit: Diego Delso
Subpages: Articles worked on · Good article reviews · GA standards · common.css · common.js
Archives as of the dates listed (250KB or more to load; threads more than 3 days to be archived by bot or earlier upon personal discretion; displayed in order of date of last thread):
- 2009-04-29 · 2009-10-17 · 2010-01-09 · 2010-04-27 · 2010-08-12 · 2010-11-21 · 2010-03-10 · 2011-08-07 · 2012-01-28 · 2012-09-17 · present
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Two years! |
|---|
Happy new year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Suggestion
Hello, MuZemike! You might be interested in endorsing an essay in which creation I participated – WP:NOCONFED. Of course, this is just a suggestion, nothing more. Cheers! — Sundostund mppria 22:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
A very, very, very old block
Hi, this may come a bit out of the blue, and I'm sure you don't remember anything. I was scrolling around random articles and their edit histories when I noticed that one User:Starzynka was blocked by you in 2010 for sockpuppeting. The account appears to be one of those accounts which spam-creates geographical stubs (a practice which, as I understand, is no longer accepted nowadays but was acceptable at the time). Around the time of the block, there was a bit of a heated discussion at ANI and the user had blanked the user/talk page. I could, however, find absolutely no trace of sockpuppeting even being mentioned in any of these instances. Is there a reason for this? Regards, Fermiboson (talk) 06:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Looking at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive218#User:Starzynka, the user was blocked as a sock back when I was an admin and CU, presumably per CU evidence. The sockmaster, whom I did not disclose, was warned privately not to sock again, according to that discussion. Any other information I would have about that specific case would be long gone, I'm afraid. --MuZemike 15:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Alright, thank you very much for the reply. Fermiboson (talk) 15:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Inquiry
Hello, MuZemike, your talk archive pages 1-7, and 9 are all currently admin level protected. As you are not currently an admin at this time, I wondered if you would have any objection (as the page protector) to their protection levels being lowered to extended confirmed?
My personal interest in these 8 pages is I'd like to address the large number of Tidy Font Bugs (a high priority WP:Lint error that affect how some users' signatures display on these pages) and plan on filing a WP:RPPD for reduction so I can address these, unless there is an objection. My edits would be minimal (one edit per page), thorough, and respectful. Zinnober9 (talk) 00:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- It was protected by another admin, so I personally have no issue with it. --MuZemike 13:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
afd
Hi there,
I wanted to ask why is the page keep getting added for AFD? It already passed, and then user US-Verified has been putting a lot of pages for AFD, for no reason. Itsalldestiny (talk) 12:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- The previous AfD closed as "no consensus", which means it can be re-tagged for AfD at a later time, which it has (though it may have been a little early, there is no time limit). In any case, discuss the 2nd AfD at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/OtakuKart (2nd nomination) as opposed to removing the tag from the article.
- Moreover, see the deletion policy for valid reasons for deletion. --MuZemike 01:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)