Revision as of 00:45, 2 March 2007 editYksin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,177 edits →For placement at top of article or section: adding Unreferenced template to list of templates← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:50, 14 March 2007 edit undoMiddleEastern (talk | contribs)160 edits →For placement on talk pages of usersNext edit → | ||
Line 466: | Line 466: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
== For placement on Userpages== | |||
:'''See ]''' | |||
== For placement on talk pages of users == | == For placement on talk pages of users == |
Revision as of 14:50, 14 March 2007
These templates should never be used on other templates, as this leads to the appearance of very large numbers of articles being disputed.
Please remember to use these appropriately, and use the most specific messages you can find for the situation.
{{shortcut|WP:TD
WP:TM/DISP
}}
For placement at top of article only
What to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{Blpdispute}} |
|
Disputed biographies of living persons top | ||
{{Contradict}} |
|
Self-contradicting article top | ||
{{Contradict-other|]}} |
|
One or both contradicting articles top | ||
{{Disputed}} |
|
Disputed articles top | ||
{{Disputeabout|'''The topic of dispute'''}} |
|
Disputed articles with list of topics top | ||
{{Disputed-category}} |
|
Disputed articles top | ||
{{Hoax}} |
|
Suspected hoaxes top | ||
{{Importance}} |
??? | Apparently unimportant topic top | ||
{{noncompliant}} |
Non-compliant article top | |||
{{notability|
|
|
Non-notable topic, listing the specific guideline at issue top | ||
{{notability}} |
|
Non-notable topic or failing to meet the current notability guidelines (verbose) top | ||
{{POV}} |
|
Disputed articles top | ||
{{POV-check}} |
|
Possibly biased articles top | ||
{{TotallyDisputed}} |
Disputed articles top | |||
{{Unencyclopedic}} |
Articles with unencyclopedic topic (not unused, although it may be redundant) top | |||
{{Essay-entry}} |
|
Articles that include thoughts or analysis or appear to advance a position or agenda top | ||
{{POV-title}} |
Disputed article sections under title | |||
{{Unbalanced}} |
|
Articles which contain Unbalanced citations. | ||
{{Autobiography}} |
|
Articles which are autobiographies and may not be NPOV because of that. | ||
{{Autobiography|date-flagged}} |
|
Articles which are autobiographies and may not be NPOV because of that, with the date at which they were flagged. |
For placement at top of article or section
What to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{ActiveDiscuss}} |
Top of article, section, or talk page | |||
{{Unreferenced}} |
|
Lacks attributions from reliable sources. See template page for special usages. | ||
{{Not verified}} |
|
Possibly inaccurate articles top | ||
{{Citecheck}} |
|
At the top of an article or section where the text misrepresents the sources cited. | ||
{{Original research}} |
|
Possible original research. | ||
{{Advert}} |
|
Pages that promote commercial products or services | ||
{{Magazine}} |
|
Pages that read like a magazine article instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia. | ||
{{Fansite}} |
|
Pages that read like a fansite instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia. | ||
{{Story}} |
|
Pages that read like a narrative and tell a story rather than providing encyclopedic information. | ||
{{Content}} |
|
Above the site of dispute in article or section | ||
{{weasel}} |
|
Article or section that has weasel words | ||
{{Missing information|Info}} |
|
Article or section where information not present may be worthy of inclusion | ||
{{Self-published|Source}} |
|
On an article where a self-published (online or in print) source is cited, and is therefore not legitimately citable as a secondary source, according to policy. | ||
{{Incoherent}} |
|
Section where some sentences in a section or the text as a whole does not relay an understandable message |
For placement in or at top of a section only
What to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{Disputed-section}} |
|
Disputed article sections under section header | ||
{{POV-section}} |
|
Disputed article sections under section header | ||
{{TotallyDisputed-section}} |
Disputed article sections under section header | |||
{{SectOR}} |
|
Section contains possible original research. | ||
{{POV-intro}} |
|
Disputed article intro top | ||
{{Unverifiable-external-links}} |
Section contains links to unverifiable external sites. |
For inline article placement
What to type | What it makes | Where it goes |
---|---|---|
{{fact}} or {{citation needed}} |
|
After factual claims that need a citation to back them up. in-line |
{{Verify source}} or {{Check}} |
|
After suspect citations or source references in-line |
{{Lopsided}} |
|
Lopsided |
{{Verify credibility}} |
|
After suspect citations or source references in-line |
{{Dubious}} |
|
Disputed statements in-line |
{{failed verification}} |
|
After factual claims that have been checked and not found in the indicated source. Explain in Talk. in-line |
{{or}} |
|
After text passages based upon original research in-line |
{{Nonspecific}} or {{Unverifiable}} |
|
After factual claims that could be relevant, but are not cited and are too general for a {{fact}}. in-line |
{{Who}} |
|
After passages mentioning general groups (such as "many scientists") that could be made more specific by naming (and citing sources for) specific individuals. in-line |
For placement on talk pages of articles
What to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{Calm talk}} |
|
Talk pages which are likely to have incivil or hot-headed disputes. | ||
{{ActiveDiscuss}} |
Talk page or section top | |||
{{Controversial}} |
|
Talk page top | ||
{{Controversial3}} |
|
Talk page top |