Revision as of 15:38, 15 March 2007 editFram (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors247,527 edits Good Article?← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:45, 15 March 2007 edit undoMurgh (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,558 edits yesNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Good article== | ==Good article== | ||
Isn't this article about right for a Good Article review? It looks quite finished to me (as far as articles are ever finished of course). ] 15:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | Isn't this article about right for a Good Article review? It looks quite finished to me (as far as articles are ever finished of course). ] 15:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I agree. About right. Maybe a ComProj notice and a final wave of polish lookover before "filing for judgement"..? ] ] 15:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:45, 15 March 2007
Comics B‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Valérian's name?
Is there a reference in the series for the name Valérian being based on the Slavic "Walerian"? Valerian was the name of two Roman emperors, and that's a more likely source for the French given name. Epimetreus 02:02, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- Mezieres stated it in an interview given in issue 12 of Dossiers de la Bande Dessinée in September 2001. Joe King 19:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Moved from Valerian (comics)
I've moved amd renamed this entry to Valerian: Spatio-Temporal Agent since this is the strap-line used for the series at the top of every Valérian album. This should also help with disambiguation. Joe King 15:32, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Merged from Valerian and Laureline
Some content was merged from Valerian and Laureline. Nabla 22:19, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
Good article
Isn't this article about right for a Good Article review? It looks quite finished to me (as far as articles are ever finished of course). Fram 15:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. About right. Maybe a ComProj notice and a final wave of polish lookover before "filing for judgement"..? MURGH 15:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)