Revision as of 20:19, 13 May 2023 view sourceSPECIFICO (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users35,511 edits →Trump edit-warring← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:21, 13 May 2023 view source SPECIFICO (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users35,511 edits →Contentious topics information American Politics: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
Line 270: | Line 270: | ||
:::Please refrain from telling me what I do and do not know. I never claimed that I knew what was right or wrong. I also never edit warred. I'll tell you one thing for sure: edit warring is more than one reversion, and I have only done '''one'''. Note: {{tq| An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page '''repeatedly''' override each other's contributions}}{{pb}}If you '''repeatedly''' accuse me of misconduct like this without evidence, then that would likely constitute ]. Please refrain from doing so. — ] <sup>(]</sup> <sup>])</sup> 20:13, 13 May 2023 (UTC) | :::Please refrain from telling me what I do and do not know. I never claimed that I knew what was right or wrong. I also never edit warred. I'll tell you one thing for sure: edit warring is more than one reversion, and I have only done '''one'''. Note: {{tq| An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page '''repeatedly''' override each other's contributions}}{{pb}}If you '''repeatedly''' accuse me of misconduct like this without evidence, then that would likely constitute ]. Please refrain from doing so. — ] <sup>(]</sup> <sup>])</sup> 20:13, 13 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::You are misusing the ] terminology. I have specified exactly what behavior of yours is at issue.]] 20:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC) | ::::You are misusing the ] terminology. I have specified exactly what behavior of yours is at issue.]] 20:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Contentious topics information American Politics == | |||
] You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see ]. <!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert --> | |||
]] 20:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:21, 13 May 2023
If you're here to place a CT notice for any topic related to science, medicine, or anything that might remotely be considered a conspiracy theory, don't bother. I'm already aware. You may point to this notice if it ever comes up.Skip to table of contents |
Shibbolethink is taking a long wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages when he isn't in the hospital 70 hours a week. |
This is Shibbolethink's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. last edited (diff) on 13 May 2023 at 20:21 by SPECIFICO (talk • contribs • logs) |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Centralized discussion For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.
WPMED Hot Articles:
152 edits | List of common misconceptions |
138 edits | Comstock Act of 1873 |
126 edits | Nicol Spence Galbraith |
107 edits | 2024 Tamil Nadu alcohol poisoning |
99 edits | James Alison Glover |
45 edits | Source control (respiratory disease) |
39 edits | Jenner Medal of the Royal Society of Medicine |
33 edits | List of pharmaceutical companies |
32 edits | Simone Badal-McCreath |
32 edits | Influenza A virus |
These are the articles that have been edited the most within the last seven days. Last updated 26 June 2024 by HotArticlesBot.
COVID-19 pandemic
Shibbolethink I know you've contributed to the COVID-19 pandemic article (and talk) and therefore I'm wondering if it comes to an end (U.S. already) via the WHO if you would review it once I've nominated , thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I would love to (and am honored by the request). I think whenever WHO rescinds the declaration is a good time to do so, as it should enter a steadier state with fewer big upsets. One hopes, anyway! — Shibbolethink 21:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- thank you (I don't think WHO will take long)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- that was fast should you agree w/ the prior posting and today's event let me know (I'll nominate in about 1 week),thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, works for me! I think Bon courage is in some sense correct that the "pandemic goes on" but I think this is enough of a milestone that the article has achieved some stability. Any new resurgences will be a footnote in this article in all likelihood, compared to the massive stable information already here. So yes, I would agree with the nomination and I'm happy to review it. — Shibbolethink 15:41, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- thank you, will take a look at a couple of things on the article, it will be GA nom in a week, Ozzie--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- done (a little sooner), Shibbolethink I have added/adjusted some things however should you find that anything (including text, ref, image) needs to be changed, added or deleted. I will act on it immediately, I thank you for your effort--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Starting the review today! Wanted to give it a few days in case there were any chaotic edits to the article after the announcement. But looks quite stable to me. — Shibbolethink 16:37, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:33, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2023
- News and notes: Staff departures at Wikimedia Foundation, Jimbo hands in the bits, and graphs' zeppelin burns
- In the media: Contested truth claims in Misplaced Pages
- Obituary: Remembering David "DGG" Goodman
- Arbitration report: Holocaust in Poland, Jimbo in the hot seat, and a desysopping
- Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
- News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
- Featured content: In which we described the featured articles in rhyme again
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages, part two
- Humour: The law of hats
- Traffic report: Long live machine, the future supreme
Infobox Policy Ideas at Village Pump
Some editors are kicking around some ideas for drafting a policy proposal on infoboxes for biographies. If you have any feedback I'd love to hear it. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 13:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Endemic COVID-19 on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
Trump
Hello! I just wanted to give you a heads up that I reverted you on Donald Trump. I agree with your addition! But an editor on that talk page has said (without much explanation) that it would be a BLP issue if the article mentions the jury finding as to the rape claim. Conversely, other editors have said it's a BLP issue if the jury findings are reported without the rape claim. The issue is currently being discussed on the talk page.--Jerome Frank Disciple 21:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yes I saw that after I made the edit. I think such disagreements usually peter off over time, it's extremely obvious we should report what most reliable sources say, and most sources report all those findings. — Shibbolethink 21:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- If you want to chime in on the talk page, I'd personally appreciate it! But I also understand if you want to avoid that mess.--Jerome Frank Disciple 21:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Responded. I probably won't go fifty rounds on this one, but glad to have provided my 2 cents. That talk page is usually a cess pool. — Shibbolethink 21:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- If you want to chime in on the talk page, I'd personally appreciate it! But I also understand if you want to avoid that mess.--Jerome Frank Disciple 21:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Trump edit-warring
Very disappointing to see a somewhat experienced editor such as yourself edit-warring multiple bits of content at Donald Trump. Especially with @Space4Time3Continuum2x: locked out by 3RR. My edit summary for the age thing said "trivial" in addition to unsourced. Adding sources does not cure "trivial" and your reinsertion ignored both that edit summary and talk page comment. Please self-revert, as you should also have done with the molestation content. SPECIFICO talk 19:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- I disagree that it is trivial, and it is also following BRD to rv your removal of it, especially since I did not add the content in the first place. Will happily respond at the talk page. — Shibbolethink 19:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's clear you disagree. That does not justify an edit war. You do not appear to know what WP:BRD says. It is not 24-BRD we're talking about. And you should also carefully read WP:EW -- thinking you're right and others are wrong does not justify edit-warring. SPECIFICO talk 20:12, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please refrain from telling me what I do and do not know. I never claimed that I knew what was right or wrong. I also never edit warred. I'll tell you one thing for sure: edit warring is more than one reversion, and I have only done one. Note:
An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions
If you repeatedly accuse me of misconduct like this without evidence, then that would likely constitute WP:ASPERSIONS. Please refrain from doing so. — Shibbolethink 20:13, 13 May 2023 (UTC)- You are misusing the WP:ASPERSIONS terminology. I have specified exactly what behavior of yours is at issue. SPECIFICO talk 20:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please refrain from telling me what I do and do not know. I never claimed that I knew what was right or wrong. I also never edit warred. I'll tell you one thing for sure: edit warring is more than one reversion, and I have only done one. Note:
- It's clear you disagree. That does not justify an edit war. You do not appear to know what WP:BRD says. It is not 24-BRD we're talking about. And you should also carefully read WP:EW -- thinking you're right and others are wrong does not justify edit-warring. SPECIFICO talk 20:12, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Contentious topics information American Politics
You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Misplaced Pages:Contentious topics. SPECIFICO talk 20:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)