| Revision as of 16:24, 12 May 2023 editMINQI (talk | contribs)236 edits user:Longway22 is known as a recidivist to WP:GAME and loves defaming other editors in zhwiki, also famous as the one who is too poor at modern Chinese to communicate, even editors from Hongkong and Taiwan cannot tolerate him. And he loves to combine material from multiple sources or different parts of one source to against Misplaced Pages:Verifiability and Misplaced Pages:No original research. He never realizes or admits his probems, always blamming others..Tags: Undo Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:44, 14 May 2023 edit undoJack4576 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,259 edits Undid revision 1154455634 by MINQI (talk)Tag: UndoNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Short description|Effort by a nation to preserve the government's authority or authenticity}} | {{Short description|Effort by a nation to preserve the government's authority or authenticity}} | ||
| '''Transnational authoritarianism''' represents any effort to prevent acts of political dissent against an ] state by targeting one or more existing or potential members of its ] or ] communities.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Tsourapas |first=Gerasimos |date=2019 |title=A Tightening Grip Abroad: Authoritarian Regimes Target Their Emigrant and Diaspora Communities |url=https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/authoritarian-regimes-target-their-emigrant-and-diaspora-communities |url-status=live |archive-url= |archive-date= |access-date= |website=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Baser |first1=Bahar |last2=Ozturk |first2=Ahmet Erdi |date=2020-07-02 |title=Positive and Negative Diaspora Governance in Context: From Public Diplomacy to Transnational Authoritarianism |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2020.1770449 |journal=] |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=319–334 |doi=10.1080/19436149.2020.1770449 |issn=1943-6149 |s2cid=219747605}}</ref> ] details the extensive use of transnational repression by a rising number of countries across the world.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Out of Sight, Not Out of Reach |url=https://freedomhouse.org/report/transnational-repression |access-date=2021-02-24 |website=] |language=en}}</ref> | '''Transnational authoritarianism''' represents any effort to prevent acts of political dissent against an ] state by targeting one or more existing or potential members of its ] or ] communities.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Tsourapas |first=Gerasimos |date=2019 |title=A Tightening Grip Abroad: Authoritarian Regimes Target Their Emigrant and Diaspora Communities |url=https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/authoritarian-regimes-target-their-emigrant-and-diaspora-communities |url-status=live |archive-url= |archive-date= |access-date= |website=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Baser |first1=Bahar |last2=Ozturk |first2=Ahmet Erdi |date=2020-07-02 |title=Positive and Negative Diaspora Governance in Context: From Public Diplomacy to Transnational Authoritarianism |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2020.1770449 |journal=] |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=319–334 |doi=10.1080/19436149.2020.1770449 |issn=1943-6149 |s2cid=219747605}}</ref> ] details the extensive use of a number of actors; principally countries governed by authoritarian states are known to engage in transnational repression of dissident and diaspora communities abroad including but not limited to: ], ], ], ] and ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Defending Democracy in Exile |url=https://freedomhouse.org/report/transnational-repression |access-date=2022-08-19 |website=] |language=en}}</ref> A range of states engage in these actions, from ] to ] of ] and ] citizens abroad. ] details the extensive use of transnational authoritarianism by a rising number of countries across the world.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Out of Sight, Not Out of Reach |url=https://freedomhouse.org/report/transnational-repression |access-date=2021-02-24 |website=] |language=en}}</ref> | ||
| Political scientists have identified that autocracies face specific challenges and opportunities in the international sphere that affect authoritarian practices. Specifically, the rise of transnationalism and practices that transcend national borders has led autocracies to develop strategies aiming to manage their citizens' migration.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Brand |first=Laurie A. |title=Citizens Abroad: Emigration and the State in the Middle East and North Africa |date=2006-02-27 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-521-85805-2 |edition=1 |doi=10.1017/cbo9780511491498 |oclc=967481251}}</ref> According to ] Gerasimos Tsourapas, global autocracies engage in complex strategies of transnational ], ], and co-optation as well as ] with ].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Tsourapas|first=Gerasimos|title=Global Autocracies: Strategies of Transnational Repression, Legitimation, and Co-Optation in World Politics|journal=International Studies Review|year=2021 |volume=23 |issue=3 |pages=616–644 |language=en|doi=10.1093/isr/viaa061|doi-access=free}}</ref> ] Dana M. Moss has argued for a typology of transnational |
Political scientists have identified that autocracies face specific challenges and opportunities in the international sphere that affect authoritarian practices. Specifically, the rise of transnationalism and practices that transcend national borders has led autocracies to develop strategies aiming to manage their citizens' migration.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Brand |first=Laurie A. |title=Citizens Abroad: Emigration and the State in the Middle East and North Africa |date=2006-02-27 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-521-85805-2 |edition=1 |doi=10.1017/cbo9780511491498 |oclc=967481251}}</ref> According to ] Gerasimos Tsourapas, global autocracies engage in complex strategies of transnational ], ], and co-optation as well as ] with ].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Tsourapas|first=Gerasimos|title=Global Autocracies: Strategies of Transnational Repression, Legitimation, and Co-Optation in World Politics|journal=International Studies Review|year=2021 |volume=23 |issue=3 |pages=616–644 |language=en|doi=10.1093/isr/viaa061|doi-access=free}}</ref> ] Dana M. Moss has argued for a typology of transnational authoritarianism,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Moss |first=Dana M. |date=2016-09-19 |title=Transnational Repression, Diaspora Mobilization, and the Case of The Arab Spring |journal=] |volume=63 |issue=4 |pages=480–498 |doi=10.1093/socpro/spw019 |issn=0037-7791 |doi-access=free}}</ref> as described below: | ||
| == Typology of transnational |
== Typology of transnational authoritarianism == | ||
| {| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| |Lethal retribution | |Lethal retribution | ||
Revision as of 09:44, 14 May 2023
Effort by a nation to preserve the government's authority or authenticityTransnational authoritarianism represents any effort to prevent acts of political dissent against an authoritarian state by targeting one or more existing or potential members of its emigrant or diaspora communities. Freedom House details the extensive use of a number of actors; principally countries governed by authoritarian states are known to engage in transnational repression of dissident and diaspora communities abroad including but not limited to: China, Saudi Arabia, Rwanda, Turkey and Iran. A range of states engage in these actions, from Russian assassinations to forced disappearances of Chinese and Hong Kong citizens abroad. Freedom House details the extensive use of transnational authoritarianism by a rising number of countries across the world.
Political scientists have identified that autocracies face specific challenges and opportunities in the international sphere that affect authoritarian practices. Specifically, the rise of transnationalism and practices that transcend national borders has led autocracies to develop strategies aiming to manage their citizens' migration. According to political scientist Gerasimos Tsourapas, global autocracies engage in complex strategies of transnational repression, legitimation, and co-optation as well as cooperation with non-state actors. Sociologist Dana M. Moss has argued for a typology of transnational authoritarianism, as described below:
Typology of transnational authoritarianism
| Lethal retribution | The actual or attempted assassinations of dissidents abroad by regime agents or proxies. |
| Threats | Verbal or written warnings directed to members of the diaspora, including the summoning of individuals by regime officials to their embassies for this purpose. |
| Surveillance | The gathering and sending of information about co-nationals to the state security apparatus by informant networks composed of regime agents, loyalists, and coerced individuals. |
| Exile | The direct and indirect banishment of dissidents from the home country, including when the threat of physical confinement and harm prevents activists from returning. |
| Withdrawing scholarships | The rescinding of students’ state benefits for refusing to participate in regime-mandated actions or organizations abroad. |
| Proxy punishment | The harassment, physical confinement, and/or bodily harm of relatives in the home-country as a means of information-gathering and retribution against dissidents abroad. |
See also
- Interpol § Abusive requests for Interpol arrests
- Chinese police overseas service stations
- Conspiracy against rights
References
- Tsourapas, Gerasimos (2019). "A Tightening Grip Abroad: Authoritarian Regimes Target Their Emigrant and Diaspora Communities". Migration Policy Institute.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - Baser, Bahar; Ozturk, Ahmet Erdi (2020-07-02). "Positive and Negative Diaspora Governance in Context: From Public Diplomacy to Transnational Authoritarianism". Middle East Critique. 29 (3): 319–334. doi:10.1080/19436149.2020.1770449. ISSN 1943-6149. S2CID 219747605.
- "Defending Democracy in Exile". Freedom House. Retrieved 2022-08-19.
- "Out of Sight, Not Out of Reach". Freedom House. Retrieved 2021-02-24.
- Brand, Laurie A. (2006-02-27). Citizens Abroad: Emigration and the State in the Middle East and North Africa (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491498. ISBN 978-0-521-85805-2. OCLC 967481251.
- Tsourapas, Gerasimos (2021). "Global Autocracies: Strategies of Transnational Repression, Legitimation, and Co-Optation in World Politics". International Studies Review. 23 (3): 616–644. doi:10.1093/isr/viaa061.
- Moss, Dana M. (2016-09-19). "Transnational Repression, Diaspora Mobilization, and the Case of The Arab Spring". Social Problems. 63 (4): 480–498. doi:10.1093/socpro/spw019. ISSN 0037-7791.