| Revision as of 20:41, 31 May 2023 editTheonewithreason (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,072 edits →May 2023← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:46, 31 May 2023 edit undoTheonewithreason (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,072 edits →May 2023Tag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| :I have read up on the WP:RS and have made sure my sources are open access, reputable and easy to read, as per advice by another user here. ] (]) 20:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC) | :I have read up on the WP:RS and have made sure my sources are open access, reputable and easy to read, as per advice by another user here. ] (]) 20:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
| ::DAI was not removed by me, it was moved to another section, also I left the construction of the sentence as you formulated, on the other hand you were cherry picking Budak, reforming sentences based on your opinion which is ] I would suggest that you do not remove reliable sources, do not make sentence constructions based on your own political opinions, and try to make NPOV based on multiple sources.] ] (]) 20:40, 31 May 2023 (UTC) | ::DAI was not removed by me, it was moved to another section, also I left the construction of the sentence as you formulated, on the other hand you were cherry picking Budak, reforming sentences based on your opinion which is ] I would suggest that you do not remove reliable sources, do not make sentence constructions based on your own political opinions, and try to make NPOV based on multiple sources.] ] (]) 20:40, 31 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
Revision as of 20:46, 31 May 2023
May 2023
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced or remove sourced content, as you did at Montenegrins, and several other pages, you may be blocked from editing. Also using multiple ip is considered sock puppetry Theonewithreason Theonewithreason (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- As i am new to this, can you please elaborate on what constitutes a valid source in this case. The book by prof. Budak and the historical De Administrando Imperio have both been removed by you. Budak refers to direct byzantine historical sources and DAI is a historical document.
- I have read up on the WP:RS and have made sure my sources are open access, reputable and easy to read, as per advice by another user here. Erasmus2001 (talk) 20:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- DAI was not removed by me, it was moved to another section, also I left the construction of the sentence as you formulated, on the other hand you were cherry picking Budak, reforming sentences based on your opinion which is WP:OR I would suggest that you do not remove reliable sources, do not make sentence constructions based on your own political opinions, and try to make NPOV based on multiple sources.Theonewithreason Theonewithreason (talk) 20:40, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
WP:ARBMAC
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.