| Revision as of 12:46, 18 March 2023 editSuperRegex (talk | contribs)111 edits Added infoTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:10, 12 June 2023 edit undoArado Ar 196 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,053 edits →top: fixed infoboxNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| |engine = First stage liquid,<br>Second stage solid | |engine = First stage liquid,<br>Second stage solid | ||
| |guidance =], ] | |guidance =], ] | ||
| | |
|accuracy = 110 m ] | ||
| |speed = Mach 9{{citation needed|date=October 2021}} | |speed = Mach 9{{citation needed|date=October 2021}} | ||
| |length = | |length = | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| The Ghadr-110 has a higher maneuverability and a shorter set-up time than the ]; its set-up time is 30 minutes while the older Shahab-3 has a set-up time of several hours. The missile has been manufactured entirely in Iran at the top-secret ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile/emad/|title=Emad, Ghadr (Shahab-3 Variants)|website=Missile Threat}}</ref> | The Ghadr-110 has a higher maneuverability and a shorter set-up time than the ]; its set-up time is 30 minutes while the older Shahab-3 has a set-up time of several hours. The missile has been manufactured entirely in Iran at the top-secret ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile/emad/|title=Emad, Ghadr (Shahab-3 Variants)|website=Missile Threat}}</ref> | ||
| On November 21, 2015 and January 29, 2017, Iran reportedly carried out launches of the Ghadr 110. The United States viewed this as a violation of ] which "calls upon" Iran to not work on any ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, including launching them.<ref>{{cite news|title=Iran sends defiant signal to the West with missile test|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/12042112/Iran-sends-defiant-signal-to-the-West-with-missile-test.html|work=]|date=Dec 9, 2015}}</ref> Russia's ambassador to the UN disputed this, saying "a call is different from a ban, so legally you cannot violate a call, you can comply with a call or you can ignore the call, but you cannot violate a call".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-missiles-un-idUSKCN0WG1NG|title = U.S. Vows to push for U.N. Action on Iran despite Russian opposition|newspaper = Reuters|date = 14 March 2016}}</ref> Iran's foreign minister, Javad Zarif, responded by saying that since Iran does not possess nuclear weapons nor does it ever intend to have them, it does not design its missiles to be capable of carrying nuclear warheads,<ref>Archived at {{cbignore}} and the {{cbignore}}: {{cite web| url = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8y9-VjXnBE| title = Resolving crisis in the Middle East: an Iranian perspective | website=]}}{{cbignore}}</ref> a statement which was questioned in light of the apparent Iranian nuclear archive discovery.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/30/world/middleeast/israel-iran-nuclear-netanyahu.html|title=Israel Says Secret Files Detail Iran's Nuclear Subterfuge|date=2018-04-30|work=The New York Times|access-date=2018-05-03|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> However, Senior Fellow for Missile Defence at the ] Michael Elleman noted that bomb design presented by ] would fit in Iran's pre-2004 Nodong/Shahab-3 nosecone, but not any of the post-2004 missiles, including Ghadr-110 missile.<ref>{{cite tweet|number=991034592974065664|user=EllemanIISS|title=So the 2003 bomb design presented by Bibi fits in Iran's pre-2004 Nodong/Shahab-3 nosecone, but not any of the post…<!-- full text of tweet that Twitter returned to the bot (excluding links) added by TweetCiteBot. This may be better truncated or may need expanding (TW limits responses to 140 characters) or case changes. --> |date=30 April 2018}}</ref> |
On November 21, 2015 and January 29, 2017, Iran reportedly carried out launches of the Ghadr 110. The United States viewed this as a violation of ] which "calls upon" Iran to not work on any ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, including launching them.<ref>{{cite news|title=Iran sends defiant signal to the West with missile test|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/12042112/Iran-sends-defiant-signal-to-the-West-with-missile-test.html|work=]|date=Dec 9, 2015}}</ref> Russia's ambassador to the UN disputed this, saying "a call is different from a ban, so legally you cannot violate a call, you can comply with a call or you can ignore the call, but you cannot violate a call".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-missiles-un-idUSKCN0WG1NG|title = U.S. Vows to push for U.N. Action on Iran despite Russian opposition|newspaper = Reuters|date = 14 March 2016}}</ref> Iran's foreign minister, Javad Zarif, responded by saying that since Iran does not possess nuclear weapons nor does it ever intend to have them, it does not design its missiles to be capable of carrying nuclear warheads,<ref>Archived at {{cbignore}} and the {{cbignore}}: {{cite web| url = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8y9-VjXnBE| title = Resolving crisis in the Middle East: an Iranian perspective | website=]}}{{cbignore}}</ref> a statement which was questioned in light of the apparent Iranian nuclear archive discovery.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/30/world/middleeast/israel-iran-nuclear-netanyahu.html|title=Israel Says Secret Files Detail Iran's Nuclear Subterfuge|date=2018-04-30|work=The New York Times|access-date=2018-05-03|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> However, Senior Fellow for Missile Defence at the ] Michael Elleman noted that bomb design presented by ] would fit in Iran's pre-2004 Nodong/Shahab-3 nosecone, but not any of the post-2004 missiles, including Ghadr-110 missile.<ref>{{cite tweet|number=991034592974065664|user=EllemanIISS|title=So the 2003 bomb design presented by Bibi fits in Iran's pre-2004 Nodong/Shahab-3 nosecone, but not any of the post…<!-- full text of tweet that Twitter returned to the bot (excluding links) added by TweetCiteBot. This may be better truncated or may need expanding (TW limits responses to 140 characters) or case changes. --> |date=30 April 2018}}</ref> | ||
| == See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 13:10, 12 June 2023
Hypersonic Strategic MRBM| Ghadr-110 | |
|---|---|
_02.jpg) Ghadr ballistic missile (8 March 2016) | |
| Type | Hypersonic Strategic MRBM |
| Service history | |
| Used by | Iran |
| Production history | |
| Manufacturer | Iran |
| Specifications | |
| Warhead | One |
| Engine | First stage liquid, Second stage solid |
| Operational range | 1,800–2,000 km |
| Maximum speed | Mach 9 |
| Guidance system | Inertial guidance, Global Positioning System |
| Accuracy | 110 m CEP |
The Ghadr-110 or Qadr-110, (Persian: قدر-110, meaning "intensity") is a medium-range ballistic missile designed and developed by Iran. The missile has a range of 1,800 km to 2,000 km. The Iranian Armed Forces first displayed the missile to the public at an annual military parade to mark the Iran–Iraq War.
The Ghadr-110 is an improved version of the Shahab-3A, also known as the Ghadr-101. It is believed to have a liquid-fuel first stage and a solid-fuel second stage, which allows it to have a range of 1,500 km (930 mi). It is suggested that the Ghadr-101 and Ghadr-110 will provide Iran ASAT and IRBM capability.
The Qadr missile was unveiled for the first time in an annual parade on the occasion of the anniversary of the start of the Iran-Iraq war. This missile is produced in three types: "Qadr S" with a range of 1,350 km, "Qadr H" with a range of 1,650 km and "Qadr F" with a range of 1,950 km. The Qadr-110 series of missiles carry a warhead weighing from 650kg to 1000 kg which the Qadr F carries. It also has a length of 15.5 to 16.58 meters with an overall weight of 15 to 17.48 tons, where the base model is two tons heavier compared to the Shahab-3.
The Ghadr-110 has a higher maneuverability and a shorter set-up time than the Shahab-3; its set-up time is 30 minutes while the older Shahab-3 has a set-up time of several hours. The missile has been manufactured entirely in Iran at the top-secret Hemmat Missile Industries Complex.
On November 21, 2015 and January 29, 2017, Iran reportedly carried out launches of the Ghadr 110. The United States viewed this as a violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 which "calls upon" Iran to not work on any ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, including launching them. Russia's ambassador to the UN disputed this, saying "a call is different from a ban, so legally you cannot violate a call, you can comply with a call or you can ignore the call, but you cannot violate a call". Iran's foreign minister, Javad Zarif, responded by saying that since Iran does not possess nuclear weapons nor does it ever intend to have them, it does not design its missiles to be capable of carrying nuclear warheads, a statement which was questioned in light of the apparent Iranian nuclear archive discovery. However, Senior Fellow for Missile Defence at the IISS Michael Elleman noted that bomb design presented by Benjamin Netanyahu would fit in Iran's pre-2004 Nodong/Shahab-3 nosecone, but not any of the post-2004 missiles, including Ghadr-110 missile.
See also
- Military of Iran
- Aerospace Force of the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution – controls Iran's missile forces
- Iranian military industry
- List of military equipment manufactured in Iran
- Iran's missile forces
- Shahab-3
- Emad (missile)
- Equipment of the Iranian Army
- Science and technology in Iran
References
- ^ Fars News Agency Archived February 6, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
- "Iranian President Defies West At Military Parade". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty.
- Vick, Charles P. "Samen". GlobalSecurity. Archived from the original on 2017-07-22. Retrieved 2009-05-26.
- ایکس, آسمان (2021-05-02). "موشک قدر F موشکی دقیق و نقطه زن". آسمان ایکس (in Persian). Retrieved 2023-03-18.
- "Emad, Ghadr (Shahab-3 Variants)". Missile Threat.
- "Iran sends defiant signal to the West with missile test". The Daily Telegraph. Dec 9, 2015.
- "U.S. Vows to push for U.N. Action on Iran despite Russian opposition". Reuters. 14 March 2016.
- Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine: "Resolving crisis in the Middle East: an Iranian perspective". YouTube.
- "Israel Says Secret Files Detail Iran's Nuclear Subterfuge". The New York Times. 2018-04-30. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2018-05-03.
- @EllemanIISS (30 April 2018). "So the 2003 bomb design presented by Bibi fits in Iran's pre-2004 Nodong/Shahab-3 nosecone, but not any of the post…" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
 Military of Iran | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armed Forces |
|  | ||||||||||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||||||
