Revision as of 22:58, 21 February 2007 editZumlaben99 (talk | contribs)277 edits →Qmwnebrvtcyxuz← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:16, 18 March 2007 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,547 edits WP:AN discussion about your son...Next edit → | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:Thanks, Ryan, for the update. ] 22:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | :Thanks, Ryan, for the update. ] 22:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
== WP:AN discussion about your son... == | |||
...]. Thought you'd like to know. ] 18:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:16, 18 March 2007
Hello Randy. Yes, editing under parental supervision would be fine, I think. Please can you post to the administrator's noticeboard regarding this, as I think this may raise more general policy issues. I hope that everything is fine with you and your family. -- The Anome 00:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks very much, I'll do that. I've never posted to my User Talk page before so I hope this is the correct protocol for answering. (Or perhaps I should post to yours?) Regardless, either tonight or tomorrow, I will follow your guidance and post to the Administrator's Noticeboard which you mentioned. Thank you again for working with me to ensure that my young son can both participate while also safeguarding his welfare as well as Misplaced Pages's. Also, thanks for the kind word -- I think we're rapidly calming down here. :) padawer 00:54, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Protecting children's privacy
Hi. You contributed to the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Protecting children's privacy. If you have the time and interest, I'm asking contributors to past a brief summary of their position on the proposal here, thanks. Herostratus 20:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- Done. Thank you. padawer 20:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Qmwnebrvtcyxuz
You may be interested to know that there is a discussion concerning Qmwnebrvtcyxuz's username ongoing at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User names. Some editors are apparently concerned that at first blush it appears to be a random collection of letters which is not a recommended form of username according to the username policy. If the discussion hasn't closed before you see this, your input would be helpful. Regards, Newyorkbrad 15:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I would just like to point out that this is not an issue with any behavior of Qmwnebrvtcyxuz, but simply a debate regarding the name and the username policy. InBC 23:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to let me know about this discussion. padawer 22:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Qmwnebrvtcyxuz's username allowed
Just as a followup, it has been dedided at WP:RFCN that Qmwnebrvtcyxuz's username is allowed. The major concern with it was that it may appear to be just random letters to many users, but due to the letters creating a clever pattern on the qwert keyboard, it has been decided to allow. Once again, can I please reiterate that Qmwnebrvtcyxuz's conduct was not at any time questioned, this was soley for his username. Thanks and if you have any further questions, feel free to leave a note on my talk page, regards RyanPostlethwaite 18:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, Ryan, for the update. padawer 22:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
WP:AN discussion about your son...
...here. Thought you'd like to know. Sandstein 18:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)