Revision as of 22:43, 25 June 2023 editFowler&fowler (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers63,079 editsm Undid revision 1161927309 by Fowler&fowler (talk)Tag: Undo← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:10, 25 June 2023 edit undoJohnbod (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Rollbackers280,696 edits →Expired RFC: noNext edit → | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
I am asking both Johnbod and Sturmgewehr88 if they consider the survey in this RFC to have constituted the consensus for a change. Pinging admins {{re|Abecedare|Doug Weller|El_C}} who are likely to know the rules much better than I, in addition. ]] 21:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC) | I am asking both Johnbod and Sturmgewehr88 if they consider the survey in this RFC to have constituted the consensus for a change. Pinging admins {{re|Abecedare|Doug Weller|El_C}} who are likely to know the rules much better than I, in addition. ]] 21:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
:Not really - at best a weak consunsus. ] (]) 23:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:10, 25 June 2023
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:Vital article
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives | |||||||
|
|||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Archive of past discussions on page naming
Several discussions have previously taken place regarding the name of this page. Please review the archive for finding out why the current name is being used. RedWolf (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no consensus to move. --RegentsPark (talk) 11:36, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Himalayas → Himalaya — The term Himalaya is used throughout the article: "The Himalaya Range", "Lesser Himalaya", and "Greater Himalaya"; as well as on other pages Geology of the Himalaya.IceBlade710 (talk) 07:55, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose The plural "Himalayas" is far more common in English. Just like the Alps, the Pyrenees, the Andes and the Rocky Mountains. I would suggest that articles such as Geology of the Himalaya are moved in line with this article, rather than the other way round. 84.92.117.93 (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose This has already been discussed twice. See past discussion. RedWolf (talk) 01:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Note Sierra Nevada (U.S.) is given in the singular, even though many call it the "Sierra Nevadas", which is actually incorrect Spanish, but that's another story. There's some inconsistency here. But "Himalayas" is likely the common name in English, even though it's not technically correct. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 02:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. As 84.92.117.93 notes, Plurals like the Alps, the Pyrenees, and the Andes are usually used for ranges. — AjaxSmack 03:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose it is commonly used with the "s". 70.29.208.247 (talk) 11:33, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:37, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Expired RFC
user:Fayninja has made some changes to the lead of Himalayas. In edit A and edit B made to the page, they have claimed in the edit summaries that the consensus for a change was achieved in an RfC which was posted on this page on 5 August 2022, and archived by a bot after its template expired on 3 September 2022. In the survey that followed the RfC statement two editors @Johnbod and Sturmgewehr88: supported the proposed change, in addition to the nominator @UnpetitproleX:, and two Fowler&fowler and @לילך5: opposed the change. Although admin @RegentsPark: (who might be away on vacation right now) did not take part in the RFC, in the days leading up to it, they had posted this clear opposition to a change. @Fayninja: had not taken part in the discussion.
I am asking both Johnbod and Sturmgewehr88 if they consider the survey in this RFC to have constituted the consensus for a change. Pinging admins @Abecedare, Doug Weller, and El C: who are likely to know the rules much better than I, in addition. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Not really - at best a weak consunsus. Johnbod (talk) 23:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class geography articles
- Top-importance geography articles
- WikiProject Geography articles
- B-Class Mountain articles
- Top-importance Mountain articles
- All WikiProject Mountains pages
- B-Class China-related articles
- Mid-importance China-related articles
- B-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- B-Class Nepal articles
- High-importance Nepal articles
- WikiProject Nepal articles
- B-Class India articles
- Top-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Top-importance
- B-Class Indian geography articles
- High-importance Indian geography articles
- B-Class Indian geography articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Indian geography articles
- WikiProject India articles
- B-Class Pakistan articles
- High-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles
- B-Class South Asia articles
- High-importance South Asia articles
- South Asia articles
- B-Class Bhutan articles
- Top-importance Bhutan articles
- WikiProject Bhutan articles