Revision as of 01:49, 30 June 2023 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,939 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Harej/Archive/2023) (botTag: Manual revert← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:51, 20 July 2023 edit undoPhotographyEdits (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers11,258 edits Getty Research Institute listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper)Tag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|archive = User talk:Harej/Archive/%(year)d | |archive = User talk:Harej/Archive/%(year)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 14:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:51, 20 July 2023
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
For InternetArchiveBot matters specifically, please see meta:InternetArchiveBot/Problem for common issues or meta:User talk:InternetArchiveBot to leave a message.
Good article reassessment for Getty Research Institute
Getty Research Institute has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. PhotographyEdits (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)