| Revision as of 02:07, 23 July 2023 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,377,766 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish/Archive 21. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:36, 25 July 2023 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,377,766 editsm Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish/Archive 21. (BOT)Next edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| |archiveheader = {{Aan}} | |archiveheader = {{Aan}} | ||
| }}<!-- 11:43 October 1, 2021 (UTC), ScottishFinnishRadish added ] --> | }}<!-- 11:43 October 1, 2021 (UTC), ScottishFinnishRadish added ] --> | ||
| == ] == | |||
| {{User|Zb04091990}} has repeatedly removed a reference to a doping ban. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Khrystyna_Antoniichuk&diff=prev&oldid=1164049718 | |||
| I've reverted 3 times and didn't want to fall foul of 3rr restrictions. | |||
| I placed warnings on their talk page about unexplained removal of content. I wasn't sure what action to take? | |||
| The link they keep removing is a press release from the International Tennis Federation giving details of the ban. | |||
| Advice if you have any? | |||
| Thanks, ] (]) 18:45, 7 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Knitsey}}, this looks to have died down? If it starts up again, let me know. Sorry for the delay. ] (]) 11:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment == | |||
| ]Your feedback is requested  at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) | Is this wrong? Contact ]. | Sent at 06:30, 9 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Question concerning the GizzyCatBella/Jacurek requested topic ban == | == Question concerning the GizzyCatBella/Jacurek requested topic ban == | ||
Revision as of 11:36, 25 July 2023
 | This user is bunny in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Question concerning the GizzyCatBella/Jacurek requested topic ban
I have recently been finding the Eastern European topic ban you imposed very inconvenient, not because I want to write about Eastern European matters, but because I want to be able to write about French matters. Could you tell me if you would consider the edit (which updates a completely outdated entry about a French media outlet) boundary-testing? I ask because after I saw "Czech" on the screen, I realized that somebody could try to use it against me. I have undone the part of my edit which could be used against me due to the topic ban the sockpuppet requested. Similarly, in recent days, I've done some work on the riots in France, and at one point I opened a discussion at RS/N and typed the word "Ukraine" (concerning militantwire.com) because that is the subject their EiC has most-often been cited on. I quickly corrected it, because my intention is not to test boundaries, but to make positive contributions concerning the reliability of sources writing about the French riots. Then when someone asked me for further information, I had to pirouette in order to answer their question... Do you think it was necessary for me to self-revert either of these two contributions? Frankly this second-class citizenship is frustrating, as it requires me to be constantly self-censoring for no good reason and because it, parenthetically, allows folks to threaten me for good-faith edits. Has your thinking evolved concerning the topic ban that only three people thought was a good idea, one of whom is now indefinitely banned? Given the subsequent history, insofar as this was not a community-based decision, I imagine you are free to lift it yourself at any time and it would be to your credit were you to do so. -- SashiRolls 00:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Self-reverting those parts of the edit was a good idea, as they are violations of broadly construed topic bans. If you'd like to seek a removal of your editing restrictions I suggest you appeal at WP:AN. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Clive Myrie
Hi, could you look at the recent IP edit to Clive Myrie needs hiding please. Moons of Io (talk) 11:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hunter Biden on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hunter Biden on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
148.252.132.205
I've noticed that you've blocked other ranges doing the same type of edits to pages like Swashbuckle (TV series) and Mutya Buena. It's definitely an IP sock, but I don't know the master - maybe you do? LilianaUwU 23:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- No idea, but children's show articles are a swamp. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:16, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Your block of Marecal989$
You might want to revoke access to their Talk page. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- All set. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Thank you
You got there just as I reported them. Cheers, Knitsey (talk) 21:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- No problem, glad to help. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:08, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- They're back. Hairbrush1232 (talk · contribs) Knitsey (talk) 22:18, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Anna Freud
Hi ScottishFinnishRadish, if you have time would you mind looking at the recent edit history of the Anna Freud article with regard to disruptive editing? There is an editor making controversial additions (eg. that Anna was homophobic, anorexic, an occultist, not a psychologist) who refuses to accept any version of the page other than their own, despite the additions being disputed by two editors. The editor has been advised about consensus, BRD etc but doesn't seem to care. Harold the Sheep (talk) 07:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- What a very partial and biased way to present this ! --T0t0 Cugn0 (talk) 09:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Vinoy Resort & Golf Club, Autograph Collection on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Family of Joe Biden on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Promotional username person
Hi, sorry I didn't notice this before you blocked them (the account I reported at UAA, EasyWithAI), but it seems that they made an account after the filter warned them the first time?
<This account>, created 6 minutes after the filter was set off, made the exact same edit that the account I reported tried to: <diff>.
Figured I should let you know anyways, since the block was for spam, not just username representing website. – 2804:F14:80CB:CF01:78BA:3B7C:458:60B9 (talk) 23:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- I left them a coi welcome. Looks like the edit was made before I blocked, so I'm going to assume good faith and assume that they read the username rules. If the spam keeps up after some warnings then it'll be time to block. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:35, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
User talk:Skankhunt42424242
Would you mind revoking TPA? They are continuing their homophobic rantings and it's quite upsetting. Thanks, Schminnte (talk • contribs) 00:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Already done. Thanks for reporting. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:55, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- It's the least I could do. Thanks for that. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 00:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Can't say they're wrong, a whole bunch of us ARE gay... LilianaUwU 01:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- touche :) Schminnte (talk • contribs) 01:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Homosexuals?! On my Misplaced Pages?!? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Can't say they're wrong, a whole bunch of us ARE gay... LilianaUwU 01:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- It's the least I could do. Thanks for that. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 00:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
User:Poor mans hairbrush
Hi
You may have already done this by the time you receive this message but that user you just blocked needs TPA removing as they are spamming their own talk page.
Thanks TLJ7863 (talk) 19:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Got this notice right before I blocked, but while I was checking the box in twinkle. Thanks for keeping an eye out and letting me know. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)